Many will be surprised to discover that the electoral voting numbers in recent elections do not entirely line up with what the actual voting results show.
Swing voters decide elections, but in recent elections, the results offer a different and surprisingly consistent message.
And there is one overarching theme: a very democratic preference for balance.
Photo: TT file photo
SOME CAVEATS
Putting a number on the number of swing voters is surprisingly slippery. Because swing voters favor different parties depending on the type of election, it is hard to separate die-hard voters leaning towards one party or the other.
Complicating matters is that some voters are not voting for a party, but because they hate another party. An interesting series of polls in 2022 conducted by Chinese-language RW News showed that in many regions, more Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) voters picked them because they hated the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) more so than because they actually liked the KMT, and vice versa.
LESS SURPRISING, WOMEN RISING
There is one pattern that is not surprising: a steady rise in preference for women candidates at all levels of government.
In the 2022 local elections, the KMT heavily promoted that they were running female candidates for 10 of the 22 city and county leaders, while the DPP only ran five. The KMT’s strategy was solid, and most of their candidates won, and in total 10 of the 22 elected were women, or 45 percent.
In local elections for city and county councilors in 2022, the percentage of women rose to 38 percent, though excluding Kinmen and Matsu, it is around 40 percent. Analysis in The Reporter demonstrated that two-thirds of the female candidates who ran won, versus only half for the men.
The legislature is over 40 percent women, but the numbers are harder to analyze because out of the 113 legislators, the 34 party list lawmakers have a 50-50 gender quota.
This trend is likely to continue as entrenched, older male incumbents elected in a different era retire.
If it does continue, in the next two or three election cycles, the genders will be roughly in balance.
LOCAL ELECTION RESULTS NOT WHAT YOU THINK
In electoral party politics, the desire for balance expresses itself in curious ways. Prior to 2014, the KMT dominated, but the pendulum swung hard in the other direction in 2014 and 2016, delivering landslide victories to the DPP. For the first time, the DPP not only controlled both the executive and legislative branches, but also a majority of the cities and counties.
The 2018 local elections were dominated by discussion of the “Han wave” sparked by the charismatic Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜). Behind the scenes, former legislative speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) orchestrated a unified front by the KMT’s local factions and steered Han’s campaign.
It was a brilliant landslide victory for the KMT, largely thanks to Wang, who had sidelined the feckless KMT chairman Wu Den-yih (吳敦義).
Now dominating government at the local level, the KMT provided something of a counterweight to the DPP. At the time, it appeared to be a one-off, but the 2022 local elections suggest two possible patterns that had little to do with Wang’s brilliance.
In 2022, the DPP’s electoral strategy was one disastrous misstep after another, while the KMT outclassed them across the board.
However, the electorate appears to have been giving the same messages as in 2018, including giving the DPP a warning by delivering another KMT landslide victory, following two landslide victories on the national level for the DPP.
Particularly striking is the voting numbers barely budged. Despite lacking a “wave” or charismatic frontrunner, in 2022 the KMT won by a slightly higher 50.1 percent of the total popular vote compared to 48.8 percent in 2018. The DPP’s vote was also similar, at 39.7 percent in 2018 and 41.6 in 2022.
While on the national level, public opinion is closer to the DPP on sovereignty, handling the challenges posed by Beijing and foreign policy, none of these advantages are relevant in local government, where voters clearly prefer the KMT. Some parts of the country — notably Taichung and Changhua counties — local DPP leaders suffer from what is called the “one-term curse.”
NUMBERS AT ODDS WITH THE NARRATIVE
The DPP does have advantages on the national level, though the picture is more nuanced and than many assume.
They have won the presidency three times in a row. In a previous column, we examined the numbers in detail, showing that President William Lai (賴清德) would likely have won in a two-way race against the KMT, but it would have been a close race.
Despite very different outcomes, what is striking about the 2020 and last year’s legislative election results is that they were identical in total voter numbers. The DPP’s loss of 10 seats and the KMT’s gain of 14 had more to do with electoral math than voter support.
Across the nation, in constituency voting, the DPP won 45.11 percent of the total vote in 2020 and 45.09 last year, dropping only .02 percent. The KMT won 40.71 percent in 2020, and even dropped to 39.96 last year — but they got the votes where they needed to win more seats.
The DPP actually increased their vote in the party list proportional representation legislative vote last year at 36.16 percent, up from 33.98 in 2020. The KMT got 33.36 in 2020 and 34.58 percent last year, but in spite of the KMT getting less votes each time, the differences between the parties were small enough that they tied in the party list legislators assigned to the parties both times.
In both elections, third parties won eight party list seats. The New Power Party (NPP) won three seats, and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) five in 2020, with the TPP winning all eight last year.
In aggregate, the voters delivered almost exactly the same messages in 2018, 2020, 2022 and last year. The numbers are essentially identical.
Swing voters preferred the KMT to run their local government, gave the DPP the presidency and their local lawmaker, and split the difference between the two parties on the party list, while giving third parties the balance of power.
That the DPP lost so many legislative seats last year is likely down to KMT Chairman Eric Chu’s (朱立倫) skills in getting out the vote where it was needed most in key constituencies, despite winning a slightly lower percentage of the vote overall. DPP Chairman William Lai failed to get the votes where they counted, in spite of winning overall.
During the recent recall campaigns, first the KMT was utterly crushed in their attempts to unseat DPP lawmakers, then once the DPP got directly involved in backing the campaigns to unseat KMT lawmakers, they were similarly devastated.
The lesson for both the DPP and KMT is that what swing voters give with one hand, they take with the other. Neither party is fully trusted, and swing voters want each party to provide a check on the other.
Donovan’s Deep Dives is a regular column by Courtney Donovan Smith (石東文) who writes in-depth analysis on everything about Taiwan’s political scene and geopolitics. Donovan is also the central Taiwan correspondent at ICRT FM100 Radio News, co-publisher of Compass Magazine, co-founder Taiwan Report (report.tw) and former chair of the Taichung American Chamber of Commerce. Follow him on X: @donovan_smith.
Taiwan’s overtaking of South Korea in GDP per capita is not a temporary anomaly, but the result of deeper structural problems in the South Korean economy says Chang Young-chul, the former CEO of Korea Asset Management Corp. Chang says that while it reflects Taiwan’s own gains, it also highlights weakening growth momentum in South Korea. As design and foundry capabilities become more important in the AI era, Seoul risks losing competitiveness if it relies too heavily on memory chips. IMF forecasts showing Taiwan widening its lead over South Korea have fueled debate in Seoul over memory chip dependence, industrial policy and
And so, in the wake of US President Donald Trump’s trip to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), all the experts on the Strait of Hormuz suddenly became experts on US-China-Taiwan relations. The Internet has certainly expanded human knowledge. Lots of these sudden experts made noise this week about Trump’s words after the meeting with PRC dictator Xi Jin-ping (習近平). Trump is going to sell out Taiwan! Longtime Taiwan commentator J. Michael Cole summed the situation up neatly in the Guardian: “We need to keep in mind that he has a tendency to say many things — sometimes contradicting himself within
It took 12 years and months of standing in the same mountain location for director Liang Chieh-te (梁皆得) to capture a few seconds of footage: Taiwan’s largest resident raptor locking talons with its mate and spinning through the air in a courtship ritual. With only about 1,000 left in the wild and very short flight windows, the mountain hawk-eagle remains among Taiwan’s most elusive birds. The species generally produces only one offspring per year. Using forest cameras, the film crew and research teams document the arduous process the monogamous pairs go through for the chick to hatch and grow up, weathering
There is considerable frustration and confusion among many, both in Taiwan and abroad — including in Washington — as to why the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) seems so dead set on using their legislative leverage to slash defense spending and disrupt the ability of the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration to function. Are they pawns of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)? Are they traitors? In reality, there are multiple reasons. In the first column in this series on this subject, “Donovan’s Deep Dives: How and why the TPP and KMT help Beijing” (Sat May 16, page 12), we examined three
RSS