The government’s efforts to contain COVID-19 have seen schools opening late amid public warnings against visiting crowded places, and some people have called for major events to be postponed or canceled to prevent infection.
The annual Dajia Matsu Pilgrimage (大甲媽祖遶境) has become a topic of debate, as the nine-day procession attracts more than 1 million people.
People who participate in the pilgrimage usually travel together in close proximity and interact with businesses and other establishments along the way.
It often attracts older people, who are more susceptible to the virus.
Scheduled to begin on March 19, it is the largest religious event in Taiwan and the cost of postponing it would be drastic on many fronts.
Unlike pushing back a trade show, religious events lose much of their significance if they are held on an arbitrary date.
However, nothing can be worse than causing a new wave of infection, which has been reasonably contained in Taiwan.
Event organizers and the government can make all the restrictions and take all the precautions they want, but it would be almost impossible to have such a large number of people follow the rules, especially in the moment of religious fervor as they scramble to get under the palanquin.
Officials are even struggling to get people who are under self-quarantine to follow the rules. Unfortunately, that is just human nature. It is much safer not to take the risk at all.
The controversy over the pilgrimage erupted after Yen Ching-piao (顏清標), chairman of Jenn Lann Temple (鎮瀾宮), which organizes the pilgrimage, vowed not to cancel the procession and said: “Matsu will protect us.”
However, while the spotlight has been on the pilgrimage, it is only one of numerous Matsu processions in the nation. Many temples have canceled or downsized their processions, but others said they would press on.
For example, the Taoyuan Longde Temple launched an eight-day procession on Saturday and Taoyuan Mayor Cheng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) was criticized for attending the packed opening ceremony — without a mask — and promoting the event on social media.
Cheng yesterday said that he would not attend a ceremony to be held by the procession today and called for Taoyuan’s major temples to postpone processions, and for any large events to follow the Centers for Disease Control’s advisory measures.
This should have been done last week and the pilgrimage probably should have been postponed.
Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) yesterday said that “Matsu would prioritize the health of our people,” adding that he had told Minister of the Interior Hsu Kuo-yung (徐國勇) to ask the organizers to postpone the event.
Hsu called for large-scale events to draw up plans for deferrals, while Yen and his associates visited other participating temples to discuss whether to continue with the procession.
Hopefully they will make the right call.
However, the spotlight should not be only on Dajia. Other events, while much smaller in scale, can be just as dangerous, and attendees and organizers should exercise common sense.
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining