Pro-democracy protesters have all but vanished from the streets of Hong Kong over the past month as residents avoid the COVID-19, but the outbreak has broadened discontent with the territory’s leadership and China’s influence on it.
Some business leaders and pro-Beijing politicians have joined pro-democracy and union figures in attacking Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam’s (林鄭月娥) administration for what they see as an uncoordinated response to the virus and its refusal to seal the border with mainland China, which might have prevented infections.
“Regardless of political opinions, people in Hong Kong have already lost confidence in the government of Carrie Lam,” said Mike Lam (林景楠), chief executive of the AbouThai department store chain.
Illustration: Yusha
Lam’s stores have experienced some of the chaos caused by the virus, recently receiving almost 100,000 applications for only 3,400 boxes of surgical masks in stock, he said.
Hong Kong’s 7.5 million residents have largely ignored the government’s attempts to calm the situation, panic-buying food staples and toilet paper in supermarkets, and forming long lines for masks and hand sanitizer in the rare places they can be found.
That has led to widespread anger and would fuel renewed protests this summer, advocates have said.
“Now, it is not really about politics, it’s about your genuine life,” said Clement Chung, chairman of the Hong Kong Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Industries Employees General Union, which has recruited 320 members since it formed on Dec. 31 last year.
“It connects all the people in Hong Kong in terms of anti-government sentiment. The disappointment and the anger, they want something to change,” he said.
Carrie Lam’s refusal to completely shut the border with mainland China — largely seen as a move to appease Beijing — has inflamed many in Hong Kong.
Four current and former leaders of the territory’s Liberal Party, which is generally in favor of business, the government and China, criticized Carrie Lam on the issue.
“As the new coronavirus wreaks havoc on the mainland, the only right decision you should make is to immediately close the border,” they wrote to her this month, calling her response hesitant and ineffective.
Three-quarters of the territory’s residents agree, according to a survey by the Hong Kong Public Opinion Research Institute released earlier this month.
The same proportion of 156 US business leaders polled by the American Chamber of Commerce in Hong Kong also said they want the border closed.
In the first week of this month, 8,000 doctors, nurses and medical workers in the newly formed Hospital Authority Employees Alliance (HAEA) took part in a five-day strike, chanting: “Close the border, save Hong Kong.”
Hours after the strike began, Carrie Lam announced the closure of four more border crossings to mainland China, but stopped short of a total shutdown. Now 10 of 13 checkpoints are closed.
That might not be enough to stop frustration spilling over this summer.
“The anger that is building up will fuel future protests against the government and for democracy,” said Lee Cheuk-yan (李卓人), a labor advocate and former pro-democracy politician.
Lee said the next marches would likely start around July 1, the 23rd anniversary of the UK handing back control of Hong Kong to China, or earlier if the virus subsides.
Hong Kong was roiled by often violent protests throughout the second half of last year, following an attempt by the government to introduce a bill that would have allowed criminal suspects to be extradited to mainland China for trial in Chinese Communist Party-controlled courts.
The bill was withdrawn, but the protests escalated into a broader call for greater democratic rights in the territory and an inquiry into alleged police brutality in dealing with the protests.
Carrie Lam rejected a complete shutdown of the border as discriminatory and impractical.
Her administration said its decisions were based on WHO guidelines and not politically motivated.
“The only consideration of the government in dealing with the infection is public health, and the government’s actions are underpinned by very strong scientific and expert advice,” Carrie Lam’s office said in a statement.
She has also pledged HK$30 billion (US$3.85 billion) to measures to counter the spread of the virus and ease the financial impact on businesses.
Not all in Hong Kong are critical. Hong Kong Shippers’ Council executive director Sunny Ho (何立基) said he was happy with Carrie Lam’s measures and that critics had “grossly underestimated the difficulties that the administration has to consider.”
That understanding is not visible at street level, where many remember the SARS outbreak of 2003 that also started in China and killed nearly 300 people in Hong Kong.
Some reactions have crossed into hostility toward residents and visitors from the mainland.
A list circulating on social media shows 34 restaurants that refuse to serve customers from areas they deem to be high risk for coronavirus. Posters outside some restaurants entrances ban mainlanders, citing health concerns.
Edgy Salon said on Facebook it would only cut “Hong Kongers’ hair,” while Kwong Wing Catering posted: “You won’t seal the border, so I’m sealing my shop.”
One popular post on a pro-democracy Facebook page bragged of misleading Chinese tourists into buying sexual lubricant instead of scarce hand sanitizer.
Hundreds last weekend rallied in at least three Hong Kong neighborhoods to protest against plans to turn some government-owned public housing into quarantine centers, angry about lack of consultation with citizens.
Last month, a group of protesters set alight the lobby of one of the buildings.
Some of the 40 or so pro-democracy unions formed since late last year have led a more organized approach to the outbreak and plan to use that momentum to put more pressure on the city’s government.
HAEA chairwoman Winnie Yu (余慧明), who organized the medical workers’ strike, called labor unions “a new battlefront for our protest.”
Chung said he hopes others unions will “take the relay baton to continue the strike,” although most of the new unions need more members to force change.
“They broke the stereotype that Hong Kong people cannot strike,” said Alex Tsui, chairman of the new, 450-strong Hong Kong Hotel Employees Union, referring to the HAEA walkout.
Additional reporting by Jessie Pang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing