In his 2016 book The Perfect Dictatorship: China in the 21st Century, Norwegian political scientist Stein Ringen described contemporary China as a “controlocracy,” saying that its system of government has been transformed into a new regime radically harder and more ideological than what came before.
China’s “controlocracy” now bears primary responsibility for the COVID-19 epidemic that is sweeping across that nation and the world.
Over the past eight years, the central leadership of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has taken steps to bolster Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) personal authority, as well as expanding the party’s own powers, at the expense of ministries and local and provincial governments. The central authorities have also waged a sustained crackdown on dissent, which has been felt across all domains of Chinese social and political life.
Under the controlocracy, Web sites have been shut down; lawyers, activists and writers have been arrested; and a general chill has descended upon online expression and media reporting.
Equally important, the system Xi has installed since 2012 is also driving the direction of new technologies in China. Cloud computing, big data and artificial intelligence (AI) are all being deployed to strengthen the central government’s control over society.
The first COVID-19 case appeared in Wuhan, the capital of Hubei Province, on Dec. 1 last year, and as early as the middle of the month, the Chinese authorities had evidence that the virus could be transmitted between humans. Nonetheless, the government did not officially acknowledge the epidemic on national television until Jan. 20.
During those seven weeks, Wuhan police punished eight health workers for attempting to sound the alarm on social media. They were accused of “spreading rumors” and disrupting “social order.”
Meanwhile, the Hubei Provincial Government continued to conceal the real number of COVID-19 cases until after local officials had met with the central government in the middle of last month. In the event, overbearing censorship and bureaucratic obfuscation had squandered any opportunity to get the virus under control before it had spread across Wuhan, a city of 14 million people.
By Jan. 23, when the government finally announced a quarantine on Wuhan residents, about 5 million people had already left the city, triggering the epidemic that is now spreading across China and the rest of the world.
When the true scale of the epidemic became clear, Chinese public opinion reflected a predictable mix of anger, anxiety and despair. People took to the Internet to vent their rage and frustration, but it did not take long for the state to crack down, severely limiting the ability of journalists and concerned citizens to share information about the crisis.
On Monday last week, after Xi had chaired the Standing Committee’s second meeting on the epidemic, the CCP’s propaganda apparatus was ordered to “guide public opinion and strengthen information control.” In practice, this means that cutting-edge AI and big-data technologies are being used to monitor the entirety of Chinese public opinion online.
The controlocracy is now running at full throttle, with facial, image and voice-recognition algorithms being used to anticipate and suppress any potential criticism of the government, and to squelch all “unofficial” information about the epidemic.
On Friday last week, Li Wenliang (李文亮), one of the physician whistle-blowers who tried to sound the alarm about the outbreak, died of the coronavirus, which unleashed a firestorm on social media. The Chinese public is already commemorating him as a hero and victim who tried to tell the truth. Millions have taken to social media to express their grief, and to demand an apology from the Chinese government and freedom of expression.
For the first time since coming to power, Xi’s high-tech censorship machine is meeting intense resistance from millions of Chinese Internet users. The controlocracy is being put to the test. Most likely, though, the outbreak itself will be used to justify even more surveillance and control of the population.
Xi is an unabashed dictator, but his dictatorship is far from “perfect.” His obsessive need to control information has deprived Chinese citizens of their right to know what is happening in their communities, and potentially within their own bodies.
As of yesterday, the outbreak had killed 1,383 people and infected another 64,449 in more than 25 countries. For all its advanced digital technologies and extraordinary economic and military power, China is being governed as if it were a premodern autocracy. Chinese deserve better. Unfortunately, they and the rest of the world will continue to pay a high price for Xi’s high-tech despotism.
Xiao Qiang, founder and editor-in-chief of China Digital Times, is a research scientist at the University of California, Berkeley’s School of Information.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The “quiet revolution” of Taiwan’s democratization took shape during the 12 years that followed Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) simultaneously becoming chairman of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and president of the Republic of China (ROC). Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) then took the presidential helm in 2000, bringing an end to one-party rule in the ROC, and was re-elected in 2004. He was followed by the KMT’s Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), who served two four-year terms; the DPP’s Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), who also served two terms; and the DPP’s William Lai (賴清德), currently in his first term. Having
Chinese hackers are ramping up attacks after integrating DeepSeek and other open-source artificial intelligence (AI) models into their operations, demonstrating attackers’ ability to leverage basic AI tools to hit targets abroad. State-affiliated cyberwarfare groups more than doubled the amount of attacks they carried out since they began delegating mundane tasks to AI and using it to develop advanced malicious software, according to TeamT5, a Taiwanese research firm. Researchers said it was not always possible to identify the AI model they used, but in general DeepSeek’s offerings are popular among hackers in China because of its high performance and ability to be
In the rush to summer vacation, some readers might have missed the launch of the renamed Diet members group supporting Taiwan. Indeed, the decision by Japan’s largest pro-Taiwan parliamentary organization to rename itself received only modest media attention. Yet historians might eventually view it as one of the most revealing symbolic acts in the evolution of post-World War II Taiwan-Japan relations. For the longest time, the group, founded in 1973, was called the Nikka Giin Kondankai (Japan-ROC Diet Members’ Consultative Council). However, after more than five decades, the organization on June 11 adopted a new name — the Japan-Taiwan Diet Members’
A disturbing incident in Taichung this month has raised difficult questions about safety, inclusion and responsibility in schools. A junior high-school teacher was seriously injured after a student reportedly broke a broom and attacked her with the handle. The severity of her injuries generated concern among teachers and the wider public. However, incidents such as this require careful interpretation. They should not be used to suggest that students with disabilities, autism or other forms of neurodivergence are inherently dangerous. They are not. Nor should a single act of violence become an argument for retreating from inclusive education. The more important question is
RSS