Following the novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China, Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) immediately announced a month-long export ban on N95 respirators and other masks to prevent local supplies from running low.
Judged by the idea that a nation should protect itself before thinking about saving others, the export ban is rational. However, certain Taiwanese entertainers and politicians have blasted the government, saying that the ban is “inhumane” and “lacking in magnanimity.”
Some even went so far as to attack Su, calling him “a dog of a bureaucrat,” and asked Beijing to “return the favor.”
These remarks were widely reposted on Chinese microblogging site Sina Weibo, accompanied by negative comments, such as “how much help has China provided Taiwan, and this is what Taiwanese do in return,” “Taiwanese are the dregs of the Chinese people” and “we won’t feel sorry when we take over the island and wipe out the people without mercy.”
It was not the first time that Chinese or pro-China Taiwanese had directed unfounded criticism at governments outside China.
For example, when the anti-extradition movement started in Hong Kong, Chinese online commenters blamed “US scheming,” “Taiwanese support” and “the idiocy of Hong Kongers” rather than China’s Hong Kong Liaison Office or the Hong Kong government for pushing through legislation opposed by the public.
When their own government fails to handle things properly, Chinese Internet users are unwilling to talk about the cause of the incident and its background from a neutral perspective. Instead, they blame others or set up targets to attack.
For some people, this perspective comes from pure stupidity, the blocked flow of information, or fear of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
However, considering Beijing’s control of public opinion, at least part of this criticism should be viewed as an attack by China’s cyberarmy against Taiwan to divert the domestic public’s attention. By fueling public anger against external forces, the CCP can escape scrutiny.
Renowned US political economist Peter Navarro, now director of the White House National Trade Council and US President Donald Trump’s trade adviser, refers to China’s approach as a “wag the dog” strategy.
Navarro has frequently said that faced with rapidly escalating internal pressure, Taiwan is the ideal target for such a strategy.
During the coronavirus epidemic, the Chinese cyberarmy employed this strategy to divert public attention from the Chinese government — which blocked the information that led to the epidemic outbreak — to Taiwan’s mask export ban. China’s leadership has diverted the public anger caused by its intentional cover-up and its passive attitude at the epidemic’s onset.
The truth is that the coronavirus did not originate in Taiwan, Taiwan did not conceal information regarding the epidemic and its government did not lock down Chinese cities or falsify statistics.
Despite the innocence of Taiwan’s government and public, the epidemic has become so severe that Taiwan must regulate access to masks.
The government must stay alert around the clock and be cautious of Beijing’s “wag the dog” strategy, which might trigger unintended consequences.
Taiwanese entertainers and politicians must not become willing pawns in China’s strategy just to make a “tiny profit” or out of excessive kindheartedness.
The Chinese government should devote its limited time and energy to fighting the epidemic, reflecting on its mistakes and taking concrete action. This would be more valuable than spreading hatred and hurting cross-strait relations.
Chiu Chen-ya is a board director of a US-based non-governmental organization.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Chinese state-owned companies COSCO Shipping Corporation and China Merchants have a 30 percent stake in Kaohsiung Port’s Kao Ming Container Terminal (Terminal No. 6) and COSCO leases Berths 65 and 66. It is extremely dangerous to allow Chinese companies or state-owned companies to operate critical infrastructure. Deterrence theorists are familiar with the concepts of deterrence “by punishment” and “by denial.” Deterrence by punishment threatens an aggressor with prohibitive costs (like retaliation or sanctions) that outweigh the benefits of their action, while deterrence by denial aims to make an attack so difficult that it becomes pointless. Elbridge Colby, currently serving as the Under
The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday last week said it ordered Internet service providers to block access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書, also known as RedNote in English) for a year, citing security risks and more than 1,700 alleged fraud cases on the platform since last year. The order took effect immediately, abruptly affecting more than 3 million users in Taiwan, and sparked discussions among politicians, online influencers and the public. The platform is often described as China’s version of Instagram or Pinterest, combining visual social media with e-commerce, and its users are predominantly young urban women,
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi lit a fuse the moment she declared that trouble for Taiwan means trouble for Japan. Beijing roared, Tokyo braced and like a plot twist nobody expected that early in the story, US President Donald Trump suddenly picked up the phone to talk to her. For a man who normally prefers to keep Asia guessing, the move itself was striking. What followed was even more intriguing. No one outside the room knows the exact phrasing, the tone or the diplomatic eyebrow raises exchanged, but the broad takeaway circulating among people familiar with the call was this: Trump did
RSS