Italy on Friday last week banned all flights from Taiwan, Hong Kong, Macau and China, stranding 768 Taiwanese passengers in Italy. Soon after this, completely out of the blue, Vietnam announced a ban on all incoming flights from those same places.
However, following talks between the governments of Taiwan and Vietnam, Hanoi lifted the ban on Taiwan three hours after it was announced, but not before an EVA Airways flight had been forced to turn back in midair, while China Airlines passengers headed to Vietnam had to disembark after boarding their flight and a StarLux Airlines flight preparing for takeoff was told to taxi back to the apron.
China is the source of the 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak, and Hong Kong and Macau are its special administrative regions. The coronavirus has spread beyond China and people are fearful. It was appropriate for the beleaguered Italy and Vietnam to ban incoming flights from Hong Kong, Macau and other parts of China.
Taiwan has also been busy defending itself from the outbreak, but now has been lumped together with China in Italy and Vietnam’s flight bans.
Above and beyond the protestations of innocence, the feelings of helplessness, the frustration and even the anger, Taiwanese should perhaps take a moment to reflect on what led to this. Such reflection might show a way to prevent such a thing from happening again.
Did this happen because Taiwan has been hard hit by the epidemic? Not really.
As of Monday, Japan had reported 20 confirmed cases, Thailand 19, Singapore 18, South Korea 15 and Australia 12, all of which were higher than the 10 cases reported in Taiwan. Why, then, were bans not equally applied to Japan, Thailand, Singapore, South Korea and Australia?
Taking a step back and looking at this objectively, Taiwan can be blamed at least in part for how others perceive it.
Italy and Vietnam should not be blamed for associating Taiwan with China. With the topic of the outbreak on everyone’s lips, people around the world — especially in the US and Europe — only see and hear names such as the Republic of China, the Republic of China (Taiwan) and China Airlines.
Can they really be faulted for confusing the distinctions between the Republic of China, the Republic of China (Taiwan) and the People’s Republic of China? Is it so far-fetched for someone to assume that China Airlines might be a Chinese airline? Is it not entirely forgivable if people confuse China Airlines with the Chinese airline Air China?
If the nation refuses to use a more distinctive name such as Taiwan or to call its national carrier Taiwan Airlines — names not automatically affiliated with China the country — but continues to use the Republic of China in referring to itself and emblazon “China Airlines” on its airplanes, then who is to blame but Taiwanese when people in other countries get confused? What right do Taiwanese have to direct their anger elsewhere?
Chang Kuo-tsai is a retired associate professor at National Hsinchu University of Education.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Chinese state-owned companies COSCO Shipping Corporation and China Merchants have a 30 percent stake in Kaohsiung Port’s Kao Ming Container Terminal (Terminal No. 6) and COSCO leases Berths 65 and 66. It is extremely dangerous to allow Chinese companies or state-owned companies to operate critical infrastructure. Deterrence theorists are familiar with the concepts of deterrence “by punishment” and “by denial.” Deterrence by punishment threatens an aggressor with prohibitive costs (like retaliation or sanctions) that outweigh the benefits of their action, while deterrence by denial aims to make an attack so difficult that it becomes pointless. Elbridge Colby, currently serving as the Under
The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday last week said it ordered Internet service providers to block access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書, also known as RedNote in English) for a year, citing security risks and more than 1,700 alleged fraud cases on the platform since last year. The order took effect immediately, abruptly affecting more than 3 million users in Taiwan, and sparked discussions among politicians, online influencers and the public. The platform is often described as China’s version of Instagram or Pinterest, combining visual social media with e-commerce, and its users are predominantly young urban women,
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi lit a fuse the moment she declared that trouble for Taiwan means trouble for Japan. Beijing roared, Tokyo braced and like a plot twist nobody expected that early in the story, US President Donald Trump suddenly picked up the phone to talk to her. For a man who normally prefers to keep Asia guessing, the move itself was striking. What followed was even more intriguing. No one outside the room knows the exact phrasing, the tone or the diplomatic eyebrow raises exchanged, but the broad takeaway circulating among people familiar with the call was this: Trump did
RSS