Local media reports have said that some universities and teachers are experiencing difficulties. A number of private universities have closed over the past few years, and more private university teachers are facing drastic pay cuts.
Some teachers have seen their salaries cut by as much as 40 percent, falling even lower than the pay of elementary and high-school teachers, while 35 percent of private universities could not afford to distribute year-end bonuses.
Faced with the closures of private universities and pay cuts among schools ranked at the bottom of the nation’s more than 150 universities, education authorities have blamed it on a declining birthrate.
However, it seems to have overlooked the fact that other than a falling birthrate, it can also be attributed to a government policy to greatly increase the number of universities.
The birthrate started to decline quickly in 2000 and fell to the lowest in the world in 2010. This was a much faster decline than in Japan or South Korea, where the birthrates are also dropping.
The decline began to speed up in the four years following the implementation of a policy to establish more universities in 1996.
That everyone in Taiwan can go to college is a situation rarely seen in other countries, and it is one of the causes — or at least a catalyst — of the birthrate decline.
I once conducted a cause-effect analysis on the number of universities and a declining birthrate at the university where I teach.
The results showed that university students tend to attach greater importance to the quality of their leisure time.
I published the results of my study in December 2013, concluding that it would be difficult to reverse the birthrate decline if the policy to greatly increase the number of universities is not reversed.
Some other academics later proposed a marriage ladder theory, which states that women tend to marry men with higher education.
Since everyone can attend college, women’s chances of finding eligible men have decreased. This can be proven by the Ministry of the Interior’s marriage rate data, which have been on a decline year-on-year.
Instead of blaming the low birthrate for the pay cuts, financial difficulties and closure of lower-ranked private universities, the policy to greatly increase the number of universities should be held responsible.
Unfortunately, the Ministry of Education has failed to seek a solution, and offers little assistance to help uncompetitive private and public universities close down safely. Instead it has pushed the problem aside using “warnings” and “punishment.”
When the government implemented the policy to boost the number of universities, the aim was to provide the public with more educational opportunities and improve their knowledge.
It also attempted to reform the Joint College Entrance Examination, which decided the fate of students by a single exam, and wanted to avoid a job-education mismatch.
However, according to the education ministry’s data, the percentage of students who suspended studies, dropped out or transferred to other departments due to incompatibility with their interests is close to what it was before the education reform — and is on the rise.
Thus, the policy to greatly increase the number of universities could not escape the “decision trap,” as that solution only caused more problems.
Such decisions require great caution.
Eric Wang is an adjunct professor at National Chung Cheng University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing