President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has secured a second term. Now, Taiwanese must wait to see whether she can deliver some of the much anticipated reforms she promised for her first term, but was ultimately unable to achieve. The whole nation is watching.
Over the past three-and-a-half years, her performance on judicial reform has been wanting. Obvious items of interest would to fix the law to allow non-prosecution of minor offenses and the decriminalization of defamation, as shown by a couple of actual examples.
Many years ago, a person complained to the Nantun District (南屯) police precinct in Taichung that a neighbor had poured themselves a glass of water — worth perhaps NT$1 — from a faucet in the corridor outside their apartment. The person who contacted the police considered this theft and insisted on taking the neighbor to court.
The precinct’s chief, a young officer, tried to convince the person not to press charges, even offering to pay NT$100 in compensation from their own pocket, but to no avail.
As theft is an indictable offense, the police had no choice but to bring in the suspect and hand the case over to prosecutors.
After all this trouble, the case was, of course, dismissed, but not before the defendant and the police had been put through a huge amount of inconvenience.
Another example involves police officers from the Fengyuan precinct in the then-Taichung County.
Officers patrolling the area came across a woman, trowel in hand, digging up a garden cosmos flower worth perhaps NT$2 from the side of the road. They took her to the police station and processed her, and — because a trowel could be considered a lethal weapon — referred the case to prosecutors.
When media reported the incident, there was a public outcry. The head of the precinct received a major demerit and was demoted to a non-ranking position.
Still, the prosecutors took the case to court and charged the woman with aggravated larceny, as the spade was a “lethal weapon.” The defendant was found not guilty.
Another case involved an elderly scrap collector who picked up a cardboard box from the side of the road that she believed had been discarded. Someone claiming to own the box reported her.
Again, the police were obliged to detain her and refer the case to prosecutors, and again the case failed to reach a guilty verdict.
These are obvious cases of minor offenses that should not have been criminal matters, but the Criminal Code does not grant police the authority to deal with such incidents themselves.
As it stands, the law requires that such cases be referred to prosecutors, and prosecutors will sometimes just go through the motions and pursue them as aggravated larceny, putting the defendants through hell.
Furthermore, many criminal cases that are prosecuted today are over defamation, and there have long been calls for this offense to be decriminalized.
Is it really so difficult for this to happen? There is no reason that defamation cannot be dealt with through compensation in a civil case.
Wang Po-jen is a media commentator.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath