Millions of pieces of junk mail fill mailboxes nationwide every year, and most of it is never even read. Election season exacerbates the problem, as campaigns are not demographically focused, and materials are sent out indiscriminately. Add this to the leaflets handed out at rallies and other public locations, and the waste is enough to fill a landfill.
Junk mail has always been a nuisance, but at least advertisements for supermarket deals and restaurants have some widespread appeal; a recipient is almost guaranteed to throw out political advertising when it is not from the party they support. These mailers also have little point, as they usually provide little or no information about a candidate’s platform. Often they contain no more than a photograph, name, constituency and a slogan.
If these candidates hope to get their name and face out there, they could put up more banners instead. Those remain in place until elections are over, and residents cannot avoid passing them every day. It would also do less harm to the environment.
While exact figures for Taiwan are difficult to come by, US statistics show that the average person receives 18.6kg of junk mail per year, which on a national scale is the equivalent of 100 million trees. The mail — including its production, delivery and disposal — creates 51.5 million tonnes of greenhouse gases per year, statistics from ForestEthics.org show. Some estimates show that producing this mail generates about 106 billion liters of wastewater per year.
A report published on July 14 last year by the Sierra Club cites a WWF report showing that more that 40 percent of industrial wood goes into the production of paper. Paper production — especially for junk mail — is particularly harmful to the environment because it is such a short-lived product, unlike furniture or hardwood flooring, the report says.
The situation might be somewhat better in Taiwan, where government estimates place recycling of municipal solid waste at more than 50 percent, compared with 35 percent in the US, but even recycled paper must be processed in factories that consume resources and produce a significant carbon footprint.
Suanne Cheng (鄭舒云), chief executive officer of Taiwan’s three major paper companies — Cheng Loong, Yuen Foong Yu and Longchen Paper and Packaging — has placed great emphasis on using recycled paper for the companies’ products since she took over the conglomerate in 2010, CommonWealth Magazine reported on Sept. 23 last year.
Taiwan has made great strides since its garbage crisis in the mid-1990s, and policies such as the plastic straw ban which took effect last year show that the government is committed to the environment. Increased use of recycled paper is also a positive change, but if trees are cut down elsewhere to make this paper, the impact on the planet remains.
There are also environmental consequences in printing and distributing junk mail. The government should consider a ban on unsolicited advertisements sent through the mail or handed out in public. Companies and political candidates who want to advertise should instead explore digital distribution methods, such as opt-in e-mail and text-message campaigns, and purchased advertising space on social media, as well as public billboards and other physical spaces.
Unsolicited advertising is not only an unwanted nuisance, it is also environmentally harmful and should be banned.
Congressman Mike Gallagher (R-WI) and Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi (D-IL) led a bipartisan delegation to Taiwan in late February. During their various meetings with Taiwan’s leaders, this delegation never missed an opportunity to emphasize the strength of their cross-party consensus on issues relating to Taiwan and China. Gallagher and Krishnamoorthi are leaders of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party. Their instruction upon taking the reins of the committee was to preserve China issues as a last bastion of bipartisanship in an otherwise deeply divided Washington. They have largely upheld their pledge. But in doing so, they have performed the
It is well known that Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) ambition is to rejuvenate the Chinese nation by unification of Taiwan, either peacefully or by force. The peaceful option has virtually gone out of the window with the last presidential elections in Taiwan. Taiwanese, especially the youth, are resolved not to be part of China. With time, this resolve has grown politically stronger. It leaves China with reunification by force as the default option. Everyone tells me how and when mighty China would invade and overpower tiny Taiwan. However, I have rarely been told that Taiwan could be defended to
It should have been Maestro’s night. It is hard to envision a film more Oscar-friendly than Bradley Cooper’s exploration of the life and loves of famed conductor and composer Leonard Bernstein. It was a prestige biopic, a longtime route to acting trophies and more (see Darkest Hour, Lincoln, and Milk). The film was a music biopic, a subgenre with an even richer history of award-winning films such as Ray, Walk the Line and Bohemian Rhapsody. What is more, it was the passion project of cowriter, producer, director and actor Bradley Cooper. That is the kind of multitasking -for-his-art overachievement that Oscar
Chinese villages are being built in the disputed zone between Bhutan and China. Last month, Chinese settlers, holding photographs of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), moved into their new homes on land that was not Xi’s to give. These residents are part of the Chinese government’s resettlement program, relocating Tibetan families into the territory China claims. China shares land borders with 15 countries and sea borders with eight, and is involved in many disputes. Land disputes include the ones with Bhutan (Doklam plateau), India (Arunachal Pradesh, Aksai Chin) and Nepal (near Dolakha and Solukhumbu districts). Maritime disputes in the South China