“Truthiness,” a concept coined by US comedian Stephen Colbert, involves saying things that you want to believe are true even if there is no factual evidence to support your assertions. Without doubt, truthiness has had a great run this year — from US President Donald Trump’s Washington, to the Brexit campaign in the UK, to events in Asia.
This disturbing trend was partly reflected in Time magazine’s choice of candidates for its Person of the Year.
The shortlist of five included Trump, who, although he did not win the prize of seeing his picture on Time’s cover, exemplifies the political triumph of today’s ubiquitous mendacity.
Illustration: Yusha
In the opposite corner were two other candidates: the whistle-blower who exposed Trump’s attempt to extort Ukraine’s president for political gain, and US House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who presided over the chamber’s vote to impeach the president.
The two remaining contenders also represented old-fashioned honesty and political courage.
The winner was Greta Thunberg, the 16-year-old Swedish climate change campaigner. Some patronize her, while others reject her arguments, but she represents the concerns of those who will inherit the future.
Moreover, what Thunberg says bears the imprimatur of most of the world’s climate scientists. She wants world leaders to act to save the planet before it is too late.
On a recent visit to Australia — first to Melbourne, and then to Sydney — I was surprised at the disconnect between the government’s position on climate change and the bushfires that are devastating New South Wales.
Almost 30 years ago, as British secretary of state for the environment, I chaired the London conference that toughened up the Montreal Protocol to prevent further ozone depletion. The Australian government was one of that initiative’s major supporters, which was hardly surprising given that the hole in the ozone layer above Australia was expanding at the time.
With forest fires now ringing Sydney, it is surprising that the government still seems so complacent about climate change. Some of its members actually sound as though they think global warming is all a hoax.
Rounding out Time’s shortlist were Hong Kong’s pro-democracy campaigners, who were saluted for protests that have been ongoing for more than six months. Quite apart from the demonstrators’ bravery and the principles they represent — most of the time peacefully — there are three reasons to see their actions as blows for the truth.
First, the demonstrators are correct to argue that the Chinese communist regime has reneged on the promises made to Hong Kong when China regained sovereignty over the territory in 1997.
Hong Kong’s citizens were assured that they would have a high degree of local autonomy and would continue living in a free society under the rule of law, but the territory’s government has proved to be a subservient mouthpiece of the regime in Beijing.
In practice, that means it does nothing to address the demonstrators’ legitimate grievances about the way they are governed and the lack of progress, despite many promises, with regard to democratic accountability in the past 20 years.
Second, in addition to other complaints, the demonstrators have been incensed by the growing incidence of police brutality during the protests. There also have been clear breaches of humanitarian law in the treatment of health workers who were prevented from assisting injured demonstrators.
The Hong Kong government says that it already has an adequate system for handling complaints against the police.
However, that claim has been exposed as nonsense by the resignation of a panel of outside experts who were brought in to assess whether existing institutions dealing with police conduct were fit for purpose.
Clearly, the panel’s members did not think that they could carry out their properly assigned task.
Third, Hong Kong’s citizens stood behind the demonstrators despite the violent behavior of an extreme fringe as the protests continued.
Although this minority perhaps was provoked by the government’s failure to engage with them or with the majority of entirely peaceful campaigners, their violence was and is unacceptable.
Some — including China’s communist regime and its supporters in Hong Kong — believed that the violence would undermine public support for the demonstrators’ demands.
Far from it. Hong Kong’s district council elections in November resulted in a sweeping victory for pro-democracy candidates, proving emphatically that there is no silent majority that supports the territory’s government.
On the contrary, the majority of not-so-silent citizens are in favor of democracy and the rule of law.
Thus, Hong Kong’s demonstrators are on the side of truth: Their territory really does want to defend cherished values and hold its government and police to account.
However, as we move into the new year I feel very strongly that the demonstrators would be wise to try to end the violence and rely on the visible strength of their support to make their case.
I still believe that, over time, the pressure of strong sentiment in Hong Kong and around the world is more likely to shift the totalitarian regime in Beijing than fighting the police and causing property damage are.
Truthiness cast a dark shadow over public life this year, and probably will continue to do so next year, but fortunately for those who care about democracy and the planet, the actual truth remains a powerful force.
Chris Patten, the last British governor of Hong Kong and a former EU commissioner for external relations, is chancellor of the University of Oxford.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Chinese state-owned companies COSCO Shipping Corporation and China Merchants have a 30 percent stake in Kaohsiung Port’s Kao Ming Container Terminal (Terminal No. 6) and COSCO leases Berths 65 and 66. It is extremely dangerous to allow Chinese companies or state-owned companies to operate critical infrastructure. Deterrence theorists are familiar with the concepts of deterrence “by punishment” and “by denial.” Deterrence by punishment threatens an aggressor with prohibitive costs (like retaliation or sanctions) that outweigh the benefits of their action, while deterrence by denial aims to make an attack so difficult that it becomes pointless. Elbridge Colby, currently serving as the Under
The Ministry of the Interior on Thursday last week said it ordered Internet service providers to block access to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu (小紅書, also known as RedNote in English) for a year, citing security risks and more than 1,700 alleged fraud cases on the platform since last year. The order took effect immediately, abruptly affecting more than 3 million users in Taiwan, and sparked discussions among politicians, online influencers and the public. The platform is often described as China’s version of Instagram or Pinterest, combining visual social media with e-commerce, and its users are predominantly young urban women,
Most Hong Kongers ignored the elections for its Legislative Council (LegCo) in 2021 and did so once again on Sunday. Unlike in 2021, moderate democrats who pledged their allegiance to Beijing were absent from the ballots this year. The electoral system overhaul is apparent revenge by Beijing for the democracy movement. On Sunday, the Hong Kong “patriots-only” election of the LegCo had a record-low turnout in the five geographical constituencies, with only 1.3 million people casting their ballots on the only seats that most Hong Kongers are eligible to vote for. Blank and invalid votes were up 50 percent from the previous
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi lit a fuse the moment she declared that trouble for Taiwan means trouble for Japan. Beijing roared, Tokyo braced and like a plot twist nobody expected that early in the story, US President Donald Trump suddenly picked up the phone to talk to her. For a man who normally prefers to keep Asia guessing, the move itself was striking. What followed was even more intriguing. No one outside the room knows the exact phrasing, the tone or the diplomatic eyebrow raises exchanged, but the broad takeaway circulating among people familiar with the call was this: Trump did
RSS