President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) on Wednesday faced off in a televised debate among presidential candidates.
Han talked of his intention, if elected, to reincarnate the Special Investigation Division (SID), which was mandated to investigate major economic crimes, corruption and negligence by high-level officials. It was established during the DPP administration of then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and abolished by Tsai’s administration.
The reason for its dissolution, reiterated in response to Han’s proposal, was suggestions of wrongdoing by the SID linked to then-prosecutor-general Huang Shih-ming (黃世銘) during then-president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) second term. The KMT at the time said that the abolition was politically motivated, linking it to Chen’s prosecution for corruption and abuse of power in 2008 immediately after Ma took office.
Han made the SID proposal to gain political ground, exploiting accusations of corruption by the DPP and the Tsai administration.
A string of recent scandals has provided plenty of ammunition, including alleged money laundering by DPP Legislator Chen Ming-wen (陳明文) and his son Chen Cheng-ting (陳政廷), an investigation into cigarette smuggling involving National Security Bureau personnel on a presidential charter flight following a state visit; and suggestions that the DPP was behind campaign interference by employing the services of Yang Hui-ju (楊蕙如), who was indicted by the Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office this month for allegedly paying people to manipulate public opinion online.
Tsai really did not need another controversy over election interference and inappropriate use of power by a public official.
Enter Deputy Minister of Justice Tsai Pi-chung (蔡碧仲).
On Tuesday, Tsai Pi-chung posted a photograph of himself, when he was acting commissioner of Hualien County last year, with Hualien County DPP Legislator Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) on Facebook, praising Hsiao’s qualities and calling on people to vote for her.
The KMT had a field day.
The next day, Minister of Justice Tsai Ching-hsiang (蔡清祥) hauled him into his office and asked him to remove the Facebook post. By then the damage had been done. The KMT was accusing Tsai Pi-chung of using his official position to endorse the candidate of a political party, jeopardizing public trust in the neutrality of the judiciary.
The deputy minister defended the post, saying that the photograph represented him in his capacity as county commissioner and that according to the Civil Service Administrative Neutrality Act (公務人員行政中立法), he was technically exempt — even as deputy justice minister — from prohibitions on campaigning for candidates.
Regardless, there is an unwritten understanding in Taiwan that representatives of the judiciary keep their distance from elections. This dates back to late 2003, when then-minister of justice Chen Ding-nan (陳定南) announced his intention to join Chen Shui-bian on the campaign trail, causing an uproar. Aware of the damage his presence might cause to the party and to the democratic system, he withdrew.
Tsai Pi-chung might well be justified in his defense, but by refusing to accept the criticism or acknowledge the damage he is doing, he is putting himself above the party, party above the integrity of the democratic system, and technicalities above public trust in the judiciary.
Offering his resignation would be a dignified, responsible move after this clumsy misstep.
Weeks into the craze, nobody quite knows what to make of the OpenClaw mania sweeping China, marked by viral photos of retirees lining up for installation events and users gathering in red claw hats. The queues and cosplay inspired by the “raising a lobster” trend make for irresistible China clickbait. However, the West is fixating on the least important part of the story. As a consumer craze, OpenClaw — the AI agent designed to do tasks on a user’s behalf — would likely burn out. Without some developer background, it is too glitchy and technically awkward for true mainstream adoption,
On Monday, a group of bipartisan US senators arrived in Taiwan to support the nation’s special defense bill to counter Chinese threats. At the same time, Beijing announced that Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) had invited Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) to visit China, a move to make the KMT a pawn in its proxy warfare against Taiwan and the US. Since her inauguration as KMT chair last year, Cheng, widely seen as a pro-China figure, has made no secret of her desire to interact with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and meet with Xi, naming it a
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) took the stage at a protest rally on Sunday in front of the Presidential Office Building in Taipei in support of former TPP chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who has been sentenced to 17 years in jail for corruption and embezzlement. Huang told the crowd that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) had sent a message of support the previous day, saying she would be traveling from the south to Taipei: If the protest continued into the evening, she had said, she would show up. The rally was due to end
A delegation of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) officials led by Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) is to travel to China tomorrow for a six-day visit to Jiangsu, Shanghai and Beijing, which might end with a meeting between Cheng and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). The trip was announced by Xinhua news agency on Monday last week, which cited China’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) Director Song Tao (宋濤) as saying that Cheng has repeatedly expressed willingness to visit China, and that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Central Committee and Xi have extended an invitation. Although some people have been speculating about a potential Xi-Cheng
RSS