The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus’ anti-infiltration bill on Friday last week advanced to a second reading and discussion in additional cross-caucus negotiations, but the caucus is faced with a dilemma: It had filed a proposal to allow the Legislative Yuan to recess from Dec. 18 so that lawmakers can focus on campaigning.
The Act Governing the Legislative Yuan’s Power (立法院職權行使法) states that a proposal on which there is no consensus should be saved for a plenary session and reviewed, which would delay a vote on the anti-infiltration bill until just before the Jan. 11 presidential and legislative elections.
The caucus is considering calling an extraordinary plenary session on Dec. 30 to review the bill, or calling an extraordinary session after the elections to deal with it then.
From the start of campaigning, several high-profile incidents have set the elections up as a choice between values.
First, there were calls by Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) heavyweights, such as KMT Chairman Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) and former New Taipei City mayor Eric Chu (朱立倫), to sign a peace agreement with China, which sparked concern that Taiwan would become the target of Chinese military invasion — the fate that Tibet suffered in 1950 after signing a peace agreement with China.
Then, the Financial Times reported that China’s Taiwan Affairs Office gave orders on a daily basis to the Chinese-language China Times and CtiTV on how to prepare their news on cross-strait affairs and Taiwan’s local elections last year in an effort to help Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) — now the KMT’s presidential candidate — get elected.
The DPP should reassert its values to Taiwanese by taking action on the bill before the elections. This would allow it to make a strong political statement that would consolidate its base.
Lawmakers’ vote on the bill would serve as an important reference for constituents when they vote in the legislative election. Reviewing the bill ahead of the polls would contrast pan-green and pan-blue lawmakers on national security, allowing the undecided to make a better-informed decision.
KMT lawmakers on Friday said the bill is politically motivated and timed to give the DPP an advantage ahead of the elections, but such criticism deliberately ignores the truth.
The bill would crack down on political donations from external hostile forces and their attempts to influence elections or fund referendum drives.
The bill would also punish people instructed by external hostile forces, or funded by them, to disrupt social order or peaceful public assemblies.
Last year, al-Jazeera reported that the Concentric Patriotism Association was being funded by Beijing intermediaries, yet when association executive director Zhang Xiuye (張秀葉) attacked Falun Gong members in 2014, she was only sentenced to 60 days detention.
If the bill is passed, any Chinese-funded operation aimed at disrupting public safety would be punishable by a prison term of up to seven years or a fine of NT$5 million (US$163,886), which would be an improvement over current penalties.
Infiltration from outside the nation is not adequately covered by current laws, thus there is presently a legal and national security loophole. As Chinese tactics evolve, so should the laws that safeguard the nation from them.
The DPP should stand its ground and pass the bill sooner rather than later, which would be in the interest of the party and the nation.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath