The case of Chan Tong-kai (陳同佳), the Hong Konger suspected of murdering his pregnant girlfriend, Poon Hiu-wing (潘曉穎), in Taiwan in February last year, was the touch paper that ignited the pro-democracy protests engulfing the territory. With Chan’s surprise early release from prison in Hong Kong on Wednesday, the case threatens to set off a new inferno.
Chan returned to Hong Kong before Taiwanese authorities identified him as a suspect. Prosecutors issued an arrest warrant, but Hong Kong ignored multiple extradition requests.
The territory’s prosecutors later said they were unable to file murder charges due to a lack of evidence, but in April, Chan was convicted of money laundering and handed a 29-month custodial sentence by a Hong Kong court after he used his deceased girlfriend’s bank card to make withdrawals.
While Chan served his sentence, the Hong Kong government used the case to justify new extradition laws in the territory, which would have allowed Chan to be sent to Taiwan and tried for murder. However, the bill would also have allowed any resident of the territory to be extradited to mainland China. Hong Kongers quickly saw through the ruse.
With Chan’s release, after agreeing to a plea bargain, President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration appears to fear that the Hong Kong government might have set a trap.
The cause for suspicion stems from three points: First, having previously fled Taiwan, why has Chan now volunteered to fly here and turn himself in? Was this a condition of the plea bargain?
Second, the Hong Kong government, having previously ignored Taiwan’s extradition requests, said Chan would be allowed to leave Hong Kong.
Third, Hong Kong officials said Chan would fly to Taiwan as a regular passenger without a police escort.
The Mainland Affairs Council called the decision “bizarre,” and said that given Chan is a murder suspect, he would pose a threat to the safety of other passengers.
Although no formal extradition agreement exists between Taiwan and Hong Kong, protocols do exist that would allow for the handing over of criminal suspects, such as airport transfers.
Further fueling suspicions, on the same day Chan was released, Hong Kong Chief Executive Carrie Lam’s (林鄭月娥) administration formally withdrew the contentious extradition bill. Was the timing of these two events purely coincidental?
National Security Bureau Director-General Chiu Kuo-cheng (邱國正) questioned the timing, saying: “All this is quite dubious, prompting the government to take into account political considerations.”
Taipei might be concerned that if Taiwan allows Chan to fly to Taiwan, circumventing normal extradition protocols, this would disrespect Taiwan’s sovereignty. Even worse, it could set a dangerous precedent, opening the door for the Hong Kong government to bundle its residents onto a train or plane to mainland China without due process.
Given Tsai’s boost in the polls over her stance on the Hong Kong democracy movement, Taipei would want to avoid anything that could inadvertently set a harmful precedent or tarnish her government’s Hong Kong-friendly image.
So far the government has prudently refused Chan entry. Until Lam’s government agrees to extradite Chan in a normal fashion, it should continue to do so.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath