As the race to implement 5G cellular network technology heats up, there has been considerable anxiety about Taiwan’s standing in the pack. As many of its global peers have already held spectrum auctions, the National Communications Commission (NCC) pushed forward the date for its own to Dec. 10 and is amending regulations to ensure flexibility to develop 5G systems and applications.
Excitement is swirling around the potential uses of 5G technology, from autonomous vehicle networks to virtual reality streaming, but the development of such applications is still a way off, while uses that no one has yet considered will likely emerge. At this stage, attention must be focused on building an ecosystem that ensures telecoms play fairly and application developers are given space to explore.
To this end, the Ministry of Economic Affairs has proposed setting aside the 3.7 gigahertz (GHz) to 3.8GHz frequency band for the exclusive use of developers, instead of selling it to a telecom. While this is a good idea in theory, lawmakers on the Legislative Yuan’s Transportation Committee on Monday last week were right to question the idea.
Testing on the spectrum that an application is to be deployed on is only one element to successful implementation — cost-effective frequency availability and equipment needs must also be considered.
For applications that need a large network, it is far more cost effective to use a telecom’s existing equipment, while the vast majority of other applications would still be best implemented using cables or Wi-Fi.
Considering the insufficient six or 12-month time limit that the plan proposes for private developers, the ministry’s idea seems to mainly focus on providing more space for public use application development, which is an important facet to prioritize.
When determining how to structure the 5G regulatory environment, decisionmakers must keep in mind the question: Are people getting the right benefits out of the limited frequency spectrum?
A better way to approach this question than setting aside a testing ground might be to require telecoms to ensure sufficient bandwidth and latency guarantees for approved public-use applications, in addition to the NT$26.6 million (US$856,904) that the NCC has already allocated to facilitate partnerships between telecoms and developers.
Telecoms left to their own devices cannot be relied on to put their weight behind new and untested applications, although they remain the best option for building infrastructure.
The major telecoms have admitted that they are hesitant to move forward with 5G development. Each telecom spent NT$60 billion to implement 4G and they are expecting 5G to be two to three times more expensive. Also, considering the 4G WiMAX fiasco, in which service providers invested heavily early on to become industry leaders only to be pushed out by the Long-Term Evolution standard, they are right to be wary.
In this race, the countries with the strongest foundations will create the best services. As the government is looking to push ahead with 5G deployment, it must not let its impatience to be on the cutting edge harm the chance to build seamless smart cities and applications that will set Taiwan apart from its peers.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath