Southeast Asian governments are banding together to take on global tech giants on issues including “fake news” and taxation, marking a new stage in the region’s approach to the Internet’s explosive growth.
The stakes are high for the governments, which are counting on the digital economy to drive growth and innovation amid domestic political tensions, and the companies, which view Southeast Asia’s social-media-loving population of 641 million as a key growth market.
The new initiatives, which have not previously been reported, include an effort by Indonesia to join forces with Thailand, Vietnam and the Philippines in demanding action from Google, Facebook and other companies on content regulation and tax policy.
“Together, we are 80 percent of the region,” said Indonesian Minister of Communications and Information Technology Rudiantara, who uses only one name.
Indonesia is already preparing legislation requiring tech companies with online services to pay value-added tax on local sales, even when they are booked offshore.
Meanwhile, Thailand’s telecom regulator, in a meeting with regional counterparts late last month, proposed that all 10 members of ASEAN require Internet and streaming video firms to set up domestic “verification centers” to combat false news.
Thailand also urged discussion of how to demand “economic contributions” from the Internet firms, whether through taxes or fees, according to a copy of a speech seen by reporters.
The council of ASEAN telecoms regulators has accepted Thailand’s proposal for the centers, and a separate document with guidelines for economic contribution is expected to be formally adopted at the ASEAN summit in November, a source in the Thai regulatory agency with knowledge of the talks said.
“ASEAN as a group gives us enough leverage, and our combined user base on services like Facebook is big enough to lend us negotiating power,” the source said.
The initiatives reflect widespread concern that Internet services, to which most people in the region have gained access only in the past few years, are fanning ethnic and religious animosities, while avoiding paying their fair share.
Activist groups are nervous about the potential for institutionalized censorship. According to Freedom House’s Freedom on the Net survey last year, all Southeast Asian countries rank as either not free or partly free.
Governments in the region could use the label “fake news” to target dissidents, said Emilie Pradichit, director of the Thailand-based Manushya Foundation, which advocates for online rights.
She called on companies to resist such attempts.
“We believe the governments should themselves not use untrue information to achieve goals that are to their advantage, and private sector organizations, such as Facebook, should take the lead in protecting netizens’ online freedom,” Pradichit said.
The Asia Internet Coalition (AIC), which counts Internet giants Facebook, Google, Amazon, Twitter and messaging app Line among its members, said ASEAN risks hurting the digital economy unless the new policies are “right.”
“The potential of the region’s digital economy ... will likely be blunted by overregulation or indiscriminate taxes and fees,” AIC director Jeff Paine said, urging governments to focus on “industry partnerships and collaborations.”
It is not yet clear what level of support the new proposals enjoy and how they might be implemented in coming months. Indonesia’s plan follows its successful effort to get Alphabet’s Google to pay taxes on Indonesia-related advertising revenue booked at its Asia headquarters in Singapore.
“Other countries asked me how we were able to achieve that, so I offered to them that they piggyback off Indonesia to deal with the platforms,” Rudiantara said.
He said that he also persuaded social media giants Telegram and Tik-Tok to establish content monitoring teams in Indonesia.
Rudiantara is now planning a “three letter system” in which if a platform fails to respond to three government requests to engage on an issue, he can ban them.
The proposal to neighboring countries includes a shared channel to communicate with the companies.
The Thai regulator wants to require Internet companies to set up and fund “verification centers” in each Southeast Asian country.
Singapore has already passed a complex “fake news” law requiring Internet companies to label or remove content deemed untrue.
The Thai proposal aims to ensure that companies take quick action on fake news and fake accounts. Facebook, Twitter and Google’s YouTube all have elaborate policies on what is allowed on their platforms and generally ban fake accounts, deceptive practices and hate speech.
However, content that is simply false is usually allowed.
“They said they already have a fast process to tackle issues, but we insisted it’s still too slow,” Thai National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission Secretary-General Takorn Tantasith said.
Officials in Cambodia, Indonesia, and the Philippines said that they support the verification center plan, saying fake news is a core national concern.
Philippine Undersecretary of Information and Communications Technology for Operations Eliseo Rio said that the country’s authorities are also working on a “one-stop” content reviewing mechanism, where if one country decides something is disinformation, the company would have to remove it altogether and not just block it locally.
“The individual governments can conclude these are fake,” he added.
Rights watchdogs have warned that media freedom is declining in the Philippines, with several officials accused of propagating disinformation campaigns against opponents.
However, sources familiar with the regulators’ proceedings said that support for the verification centers is not unanimous across Asia. Three executives at targeted companies said they do not believe the idea will work, in part because it includes a wide range of global companies.
Facebook, Line, Amazon, Netflix and Walt Disney were among those that attended a meeting last month with regulators to discuss the proposal.
Google and Netflix declined to comment, while Amazon, Facebook, Line and Walt Disney did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Singapore and Indonesia already plan to impose goods and services taxes on foreign companies offering digital services, and talks are ongoing among Southeast Asian regulators for a region-wide effort.
That topic was also discussed in the industry meeting.
“Missing income is also a problem, and we asked for their cooperation on this too,” Takorn said.
Additional reporting by Prak Chan Thul, Neil Jerome Morales and Liz Lee
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath