Southeast Asian governments are banding together to take on global tech giants on issues including “fake news” and taxation, marking a new stage in the region’s approach to the Internet’s explosive growth.
The stakes are high for the governments, which are counting on the digital economy to drive growth and innovation amid domestic political tensions, and the companies, which view Southeast Asia’s social-media-loving population of 641 million as a key growth market.
The new initiatives, which have not previously been reported, include an effort by Indonesia to join forces with Thailand, Vietnam and the Philippines in demanding action from Google, Facebook and other companies on content regulation and tax policy.
“Together, we are 80 percent of the region,” said Indonesian Minister of Communications and Information Technology Rudiantara, who uses only one name.
Indonesia is already preparing legislation requiring tech companies with online services to pay value-added tax on local sales, even when they are booked offshore.
Meanwhile, Thailand’s telecom regulator, in a meeting with regional counterparts late last month, proposed that all 10 members of ASEAN require Internet and streaming video firms to set up domestic “verification centers” to combat false news.
Thailand also urged discussion of how to demand “economic contributions” from the Internet firms, whether through taxes or fees, according to a copy of a speech seen by reporters.
The council of ASEAN telecoms regulators has accepted Thailand’s proposal for the centers, and a separate document with guidelines for economic contribution is expected to be formally adopted at the ASEAN summit in November, a source in the Thai regulatory agency with knowledge of the talks said.
“ASEAN as a group gives us enough leverage, and our combined user base on services like Facebook is big enough to lend us negotiating power,” the source said.
The initiatives reflect widespread concern that Internet services, to which most people in the region have gained access only in the past few years, are fanning ethnic and religious animosities, while avoiding paying their fair share.
Activist groups are nervous about the potential for institutionalized censorship. According to Freedom House’s Freedom on the Net survey last year, all Southeast Asian countries rank as either not free or partly free.
Governments in the region could use the label “fake news” to target dissidents, said Emilie Pradichit, director of the Thailand-based Manushya Foundation, which advocates for online rights.
She called on companies to resist such attempts.
“We believe the governments should themselves not use untrue information to achieve goals that are to their advantage, and private sector organizations, such as Facebook, should take the lead in protecting netizens’ online freedom,” Pradichit said.
The Asia Internet Coalition (AIC), which counts Internet giants Facebook, Google, Amazon, Twitter and messaging app Line among its members, said ASEAN risks hurting the digital economy unless the new policies are “right.”
“The potential of the region’s digital economy ... will likely be blunted by overregulation or indiscriminate taxes and fees,” AIC director Jeff Paine said, urging governments to focus on “industry partnerships and collaborations.”
It is not yet clear what level of support the new proposals enjoy and how they might be implemented in coming months. Indonesia’s plan follows its successful effort to get Alphabet’s Google to pay taxes on Indonesia-related advertising revenue booked at its Asia headquarters in Singapore.
“Other countries asked me how we were able to achieve that, so I offered to them that they piggyback off Indonesia to deal with the platforms,” Rudiantara said.
He said that he also persuaded social media giants Telegram and Tik-Tok to establish content monitoring teams in Indonesia.
Rudiantara is now planning a “three letter system” in which if a platform fails to respond to three government requests to engage on an issue, he can ban them.
The proposal to neighboring countries includes a shared channel to communicate with the companies.
The Thai regulator wants to require Internet companies to set up and fund “verification centers” in each Southeast Asian country.
Singapore has already passed a complex “fake news” law requiring Internet companies to label or remove content deemed untrue.
The Thai proposal aims to ensure that companies take quick action on fake news and fake accounts. Facebook, Twitter and Google’s YouTube all have elaborate policies on what is allowed on their platforms and generally ban fake accounts, deceptive practices and hate speech.
However, content that is simply false is usually allowed.
“They said they already have a fast process to tackle issues, but we insisted it’s still too slow,” Thai National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission Secretary-General Takorn Tantasith said.
Officials in Cambodia, Indonesia, and the Philippines said that they support the verification center plan, saying fake news is a core national concern.
Philippine Undersecretary of Information and Communications Technology for Operations Eliseo Rio said that the country’s authorities are also working on a “one-stop” content reviewing mechanism, where if one country decides something is disinformation, the company would have to remove it altogether and not just block it locally.
“The individual governments can conclude these are fake,” he added.
Rights watchdogs have warned that media freedom is declining in the Philippines, with several officials accused of propagating disinformation campaigns against opponents.
However, sources familiar with the regulators’ proceedings said that support for the verification centers is not unanimous across Asia. Three executives at targeted companies said they do not believe the idea will work, in part because it includes a wide range of global companies.
Facebook, Line, Amazon, Netflix and Walt Disney were among those that attended a meeting last month with regulators to discuss the proposal.
Google and Netflix declined to comment, while Amazon, Facebook, Line and Walt Disney did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Singapore and Indonesia already plan to impose goods and services taxes on foreign companies offering digital services, and talks are ongoing among Southeast Asian regulators for a region-wide effort.
That topic was also discussed in the industry meeting.
“Missing income is also a problem, and we asked for their cooperation on this too,” Takorn said.
Additional reporting by Prak Chan Thul, Neil Jerome Morales and Liz Lee
An outrageous dismissal of the exemplary Taiwanese fight against COVID-19 has been perpetrated by the EU. There is no excuse. I presume that everyone who reads the Taipei Times knows that the EU has excluded Taiwan from its so-called “safe list,” which permits citizens unhindered travel to and from the countries of the EU. As the EU does not feel that it needs to explain the character of this exclusive list, perhaps we should examine it ourselves in some detail. There are 14 nations on the list that have been chosen as safe countries of origin and safe countries of destination for
Filmmakers in Taiwan used to struggle when it came to telling a story that could resonate internationally. Things started to change when the 2017 drama series The Teenage Psychic (通靈少女), a collaboration between HBO Asia and Taiwanese Public Television Service (PTS), became a huge hit not just locally, but also internationally. The coming-of-age story was adapted from the 2013 PTS-produced short film The Busy Young Psychic (神算). Entirely filmed in Taiwan, the Mandarin-language series even made it on HBO’s streaming platforms in the US. It is proof that a well-told Taiwanese story can absolutely win the hearts and minds of hard-to-please
Drugged with sedatives, handcuffed and wearing a bright orange prison tunic, British fraud investigator and former journalist Peter Humphrey was escorted by warders into an interrogation room filled with reporters, locked inside a steel cage and fastened to a metal “tiger chair.” Humphrey recalls: “I was completely surrounded by officers, dazed, manacled and with cameras pointing at me through the bars. I was fighting for my life like a caged animal. It was horrifying.” Footage from the interrogation was later artfully edited to give the appearance of a confession and broadcast on Chinese state media. While this might sound like an
The US House of Representatives on July 1 passed by unanimous consent a bipartisan bill that would penalize Chinese officials who implement Beijing’s new national security legislation in Hong Kong, as well as banks that do business with them. The following day, the US Senate unanimously passed the bill, which was later sent to the White House, where it awaits US President Donald Trump’s signature. The bill does not spell out what the sanctions would look like and Trump has yet to sign it into law, but Reuters on Thursday last week reported that five major Chinese state lenders are considering