The Consumers’ Foundation on Monday urged the government to explore alternatives to thermal paper for receipts, which are produced using chemicals that are harmful to the body and make the receipts non-recyclable.
After the government began limiting the use of the compound bisphenol A (BPA), many companies that produce receipt paper substituted it with a structurally similar compound, bisphenol S (BPS).
The issue must not go unheeded by the government, as BPS is known to affect the female reproductive system by disrupting endocrine function and reducing estrogen levels.
In tests conducted by US-based non-profit organization the Environmental Working Group, it was found that cashiers have 30 percent more BPS in their bodies than the average person, making them a particularly high-risk group for reproductive issues.
Tests by the Consumers’ Foundation found that receipts in Taiwan often contain more than 3,000ppm of BPS, well in excess of the 10ppm that is considered acceptable.
The issue is of particular concern in Taiwan because, unlike the US, England and other countries where card payments are common and where people often say “no” to receipts, Taiwan is still a predominantly cash-driven society.
Also, more people in Taiwan take their receipts than consumers elsewhere do, due to the government’s Uniform Invoice Lottery, which incentivizes the behavior to prevent businesses dodging taxes. That means the average Taiwanese not only handles receipts more in the course of an average day, but will handle them again when the government announces the winning numbers. To exacerbate the matter, thermal paper is used to facilitate lining up at post offices, government offices and clinics, and it is used to print admission tickets at some public gyms.
Aside from their effects on health, receipts also have an environmental impact. A report from the Web site Metro published in April on the oil and water needed to produce thermal paper receipts in the UK said that “around 2.5kg [carbon dioxide-equivalent per kilograms] of receipts is generated in carbon emissions — the equivalent of around 21km driven in a car.”
Part of the problem is that thermal paper receipts cannot be recycled, as attempting to do so would release BPA and BPS into the air. They also cannot be composted, as that would contaminate groundwater.
Consumers need receipts, so many countries have been exploring options to replace thermal paper with other options. The most obvious answer would be digital receipts, but the challenge to implementation is a card-payment penetration that remains relatively low — about 30 percent of transactions in Taiwan. Cashiers could also offer to e-mail or text receipts, but the barrier would be reluctance on the part of consumers to hand over personal data.
The Ministry of Economic Affairs could encourage higher adoption of payment cards by subsidizing point-of-sale equipment and transaction costs for retailers, as well as providing free cards to consumers, who currently pay a non-refundable NT$100 deposit for such cards. Another option might be to offer “receipt cards” on which consumers could store receipts digitally, even if they pay with cash. Reusable plastic cards could be provided by the ministry free of charge, with the option of using a smartphone app instead.
The attention that has been focused on disposable plastic straws is good, but thermal paper is just as ubiquitous and must be given more attention because of the harm it can do. In Taiwan, where the effects of a declining birthrate are already being felt, the government must ensure that everyday items like receipts will not be a further hindrance.
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
RSS