Taipei’s outspoken surgeon-turned-mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), who last month launched the Taiwan People’s Party, constantly has his foot in his mouth. Last week, he described Presidential Office Secretary-General Chen Chu (陳菊) as “a fatter version of [Kaohsiung Mayor] Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜).”
Unfortunately, Ko’s fat shaming of Chen is just the latest in a long line of chauvinistic invective directed at female politicians by their male counterparts.
Last year, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) was reported to have called Chen a “fat sow,” while former Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) chairman Shih Ming-te (施明德) in 2011 notoriously demanded that then-presidential primary candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) reveal her sexual orientation, because she was single.
However, from another perspective, Ko’s uncouth remark is yet another example that he will do and say almost anything in an increasingly desperate attempt to hijack the media narrative in his (as yet unofficial) bid for the presidency.
Ko’s remark was a response to a clear piece of trolling by DPP Legislator Tuan Yi-kang (段宜康), who posted on Facebook: “Ko Wen-je is a Han Kuo-yu who did better in exams.” This was a red rag to a bull. Ko jumped in feet first with an extravagant slur of his own, directed at Tuan’s fellow party member, Chen. Ko’s response to the ensuing media fracas is worth exploring, as it reveals his wider political strategy.
Ko has so far categorically refused to apologize for his remark, offering up a variety of excuses for his ad hominem attack. Speaking to reporters, Ko initially said his comment was due to a “rush of blood to the head,” then tried to draw a line under the controversy by saying: “I’ve said what I’ve said and that’s it.”
When this did not work, Taipei’s mayor attempted to obfuscate by drawing a bizarre comparison with his former profession, saying that words such as “fat, thin, short or tall” are mere adjectives describing a “condition.”
Stop the presses: There has been an awful mix-up. Ko was not mocking Chen. No, he was conducting a dispassionate assessment of her medical “condition.”
Ko then tried to play the victim card, lamenting that Taiwanese society often fixates on a single word that someone says and then labels it a “speech crime.” Ko said: “I hate it,” adding that if the word “fat” is forbidden, then it should be expunged from the dictionary.
The catalog of excuses demonstrates that Ko is yet again treating the public with contempt and insulting voters’ intelligence. Ko is of course a past master at deploying sophistry and adopting contradictory positions designed to love bomb both sides of Taiwan’s political divide.
A classic example occurred last month when, despite having previously given off strong pro-China signals, including stating on Aug. 24 that “both sides of the Taiwan Strait are one family,” Ko abruptly swapped his China hat for his Taiwan hat. Asked by reporters about the pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong, Ko warned of the “psychopath next door,” in a thinly veiled reference to Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Asked if he was referring to Xi, Ko laughed and said: “Do not get me in trouble.”
Ko’s apparent lack of clear principles, and his body shaming of Chen and refusal to apologize, will likely be a major turn-off for voters. Taipei’s mayor is rapidly burning through political capital.
Taiwan-India relations appear to have been put on the back burner this year, including on Taiwan’s side. Geopolitical pressures have compelled both countries to recalibrate their priorities, even as their core security challenges remain unchanged. However, what is striking is the visible decline in the attention India once received from Taiwan. The absence of the annual Diwali celebrations for the Indian community and the lack of a commemoration marking the 30-year anniversary of the representative offices, the India Taipei Association and the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center, speak volumes and raise serious questions about whether Taiwan still has a coherent India
Recent media reports have again warned that traditional Chinese medicine pharmacies are disappearing and might vanish altogether within the next 15 years. Yet viewed through the broader lens of social and economic change, the rise and fall — or transformation — of industries is rarely the result of a single factor, nor is it inherently negative. Taiwan itself offers a clear parallel. Once renowned globally for manufacturing, it is now best known for its high-tech industries. Along the way, some businesses successfully transformed, while others disappeared. These shifts, painful as they might be for those directly affected, have not necessarily harmed society
Legislators of the opposition parties, consisting of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), on Friday moved to initiate impeachment proceedings against President William Lai (賴清德). They accused Lai of undermining the nation’s constitutional order and democracy. For anyone who has been paying attention to the actions of the KMT and the TPP in the legislature since they gained a combined majority in February last year, pushing through constitutionally dubious legislation, defunding the Control Yuan and ensuring that the Constitutional Court is unable to operate properly, such an accusation borders the absurd. That they are basing this
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) spokesman Justin Wu (吳崢) on Monday rebuked seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers for stalling a special defense budget and visiting China. The legislators — including Weng Hsiao-ling (翁曉玲), Yeh Yuan-chih (葉元之) and Lin Szu-ming (林思銘) — attended an event in Xiamen, China, over the weekend hosted by the Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association, where they met officials from Beijing’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO). “Weng’s decision to stall the special defense budget defies majority public opinion,” Wu said, accusing KMT legislators of acting as proxies for Beijing. KMT Legislator Wu Tsung-hsien (吳宗憲), acting head of the party’s Culture and Communications
RSS