Last month, an influx of slender women to midtown Manhattan signaled the onset of fashion week, the two-yearly round of catwalk shows. After passing on to London, Milan and Paris, the prevailing sensibility coheres into an agreed style.
Only this season, the final one of the decade, that sensibility might be about to evaporate. A summer of fire in the high Arctic and the Amazon was capped by something to celebrate: the arrival in New York Harbor of 16-year-old Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg after she crossed the Atlantic on an emissions-free yacht.
Her first duty, she said, was to join a climate protest ahead of the UN climate action summit this month.
Illustration: Lance Liu
“We need to stand together and take action because otherwise it might be too late,” Thunberg said.
“It is insane that a 16-year-old would have to cross the Atlantic to take a stand,” she said. “The climate and ecological crisis is a global crisis and the biggest humanity has ever faced.”
If anyone is in the mood to buy personal luxury goods, it would be surprising. Fashion, which has avoided environmental scrutiny, is faced with increasing consumer and regulatory pressure to improve its profile in a globalized market that is now said to generate US$1.5 trillion annually.
Selling the dream of fashion and luxury while reassuring customers that it can be done without further damaging the planet is a tightrope walk.
Over the past month, that tension between consumption and the climate crisis has reached the international stage.
Under the guidance of French President Emmanuel Macron at the G7 summit in Biarritz, France, 32 fashion companies signed a “fashion pact” to emphasize sustainability in the industry. They included some of the largest luxury brands in the market — Chanel, Ralph Lauren and Prada — as well as “fast fashion” producers, including H&M Group and Zara. Fast fashion retailers have come under fire from environmental campaigners for encouraging a market that sees about 300,000 tonnes of clothes dumped in UK landfills each year.
“We are taking our responsibility through collective action and common objectives,” said Francois-Henri Pinault, chairman and chief executive officer of Kering, the French luxury-goods conglomerate that owns Balenciaga, Gucci, Alexander McQueen and Saint Laurent among others.
However, the so-called pact is notably short of firm goals to reduce planet-heating emissions.
According to a UN study, the fashion industry is responsible for about 10 percent of all greenhouse gas emissions, 20 percent of all wastewater and consumes more energy than the airline and shipping industries combined.
The figures are disputed, but the message is clear: Fashion is a major polluter and in an industry that depends on human desire for the new, questions hang over it like a dead weight.
Few believe that the French fashion houses would act if it were not for growing consumer pressure. Kering has been publishing an “environmental profit and loss” statement for its products since 2015; rival LVMH, the owner of Louis Vuitton, Christian Dior, as well as a stake in Stella McCartney — the label famous for banishing fur and leather — has yet to follow suit.
However, others have joined the rush to publish updated public sustainability reports.
“The fashion industry was behind the curve on this and it’s playing catch-up to the way people feel,” said Tim Blanks, a leading analyst at Business of Fashion. “Fashion brands are being held to account and developing an awareness and sense of consequence that it has been truly oblivious to.”
Supermodel Amber Valletta says that as much as she appreciated being told she looked good in this or that outfit, she often felt a disconnect between her job and the business.
About 15 years ago, she told the Observer, she “started to connect the dots with the environment and cheap labor.”
Fashion, she claims, is an insular world with maybe 1,000 people at the top of the industry.
“Fashion is an insular world. There aren’t that many people who hold the power. We live in a fashion bubble, but it trickles down in ways we’re not really conscious of, to fast fashion and cheap labor. The reality is were affecting a lot of people and the planet,” Valletta said.
Valletta recently shelved a fashion line on the basis that it would just be adding to the amount of stuff available without coming up with an environmentally innovative way of doing it.
“Something went wrong. We lost meaning in what we were doing and people lost meaning between what they need and what they buy,” she said. “The question is: How are we going to do things the right way? It’s like we have to change the way we make things, sell things and wear things. Everything really.”
She is planning a documentary looking at the underlying issues.
“It’s important that people at the top of the industry become the leaders of the change. In the past we fought for all sorts of causes. Now we have to fight for sustainability. Now we have to fight for the planet,” she said.
To be truly sustainable, brands might have to consider producing less at a time when consumers want more.
According to a report by the Global Fashion Agenda, any progress toward sustainability is actually decreasing by as much as a third.
Brands, it warned, have yet to solve the trade-off between growth and managing their environmental footprint.
With clothing production expected to hit 102 million tonnes a year by 2030, sustainability efforts need to accelerate to avoid even more strain being placed on the world’s resources.
Blanks, who helped chair this year’s fashion sustainability summit in Copenhagen, said that the issues are inclusivity and accountability: “If you are accountable, then you have a sense of cause and effect and it permeates everything you do. If you are inclusive, then you have to have respect for the environment.”
“You shouldn’t underestimate the work that’s being done at different companies,” says Pinault, who is trying to get companies to sign up to eliminating single-use plastics and accelerate the industry’s transition to renewable energy.
“The problem is that we’re all working in our little corners, so despite our efforts, everything we do is completely offset by the growth,” he added.
Kering itself, which has gone further than many to manage this equation, has seen its environmental scorecard — measured by air emissions, water pollution and land use — getting worse.
The emerging argument, it seems, is to buy less, but buy better on the principle that consumers will treasure and reuse those clothes and get off the seasonal treadmill.
Couture is more sustainable in the sense that you’re paying a lot of money for something that’s produced to an incredibly high standard and there’s no disposability written into it,” Blanks said.
The recent Valentino haute couture show, he added, was so spectacular that it received a 10-minute standing ovation from an audience where some were moved to tears of joy.
“It’s the ethos of the heirloom — the highest end of the market is where you see this ethos realized in a very real way,” he said.
The Valentino show that was part of Paris Fashion Week in July.
Of course, haute couture is beyond the budget of most consumers, but the underlying principle — replace seasonal binge-shopping with clothes that express thoughtfulness and care — is the same.
“It’s much more fun because its about creativity and self-expression, and that’s more challenging and rewarding,” Blanks said.
This is not new to environmentally conscious millennials — many have adopted Earth-saving circular economy resellers like DePop, Farfetch’s Second Life and the RealReal en masse. In a season when the New York fashion emporium Barneys went bankrupt, the RealReal is valued at US$2.39 billion.
“Our focus on extending the life cycle of luxury and keeping pieces in circulation through resale offers a more sustainable way to shop luxury,” RealReal’s Michael Groffenberger said.
The company acts as a go-between for secondhand haute couture between buyers and sellers — so-called “authenticated luxury consignment.”
Groffenberger notes that 64 percent of its millennial sellers, or consignors, say that environmental impact is the key reason for using the service.
There are signs too, that the design community is beginning to wake up. Italy’s Prada has said it wants to source all of its emblematic Nylon accessories from recycled materials, including ocean waste, by the end of 2021. Giorgio Armani and Versace have both stopped the use of certain materials.
“We have years of talk, but now change is at the forefront,” said Orsola de Castro of Fashion Revolution, a group campaigning for greater industry transparency.
De Castro credits the growing awareness to several events, including the Rana Plaza disaster in Bangladesh in 2013, growing awareness of the environmental damage from microfibres and the impact of British fashion house Burberry destroying ￡30 million (US$36.9 million) of stock to guard against conterfeits. (The French government floated a plan earlier this year to outlaw the widespread practice of destroying unsold clothes and luxury goods.)
“The negative impact of the fashion industry has reached its nadir and now consumers are beginning to ask the right questions,” De Castro said.
A reaction against the excessive consumerism of fashion is taking shape: Recently, UK-based protest group Extinction Rebellion announced plans to shut down London fashion week, which is to start on Friday next week.
“In recognition of the existential threat that faces us, we ask the British Fashion Council to be the leaders the world needs now and to cancel London fashion week,” the group wrote in a letter to the British Fashion Council.
There is little hope of that happening, but in New York, nine labels have so far refused to stage fashion shows at Hudson Yards, a vast development on the city’s westside, in protest against real-estate developer Stephen Ross, who recently held a re-election fundraiser at his Hamptons home for climate-change denier US President Donald Trump.
Fashion is worth ￡32 billion to the UK economy and Britons buy more garments than any other country in Europe. They also, it would seem, throw a lot away.
In protest at the 11 million items of clothing that end up in UK landfills each week, model Stella Tennant and charity Oxfam recently launched their campaign against more than 50 million single-use items of clothing purchased by Britons this summer.
For their Second Hand September campaign, the pair are asking consumers to abstain from buying new clothes for 30 days and shop, ideally, at Oxfam to raise money for its programs.
As the Financial Times pointed out, the campaign comes “slap at the beginning of the show season.”
Tennant points out that she has never been a seasonal shopper: “The things I loved 20 years ago I still love. The enemy is our insatiable desire for the new. We’re human, and of course we love new things, and it’s so exciting to see what these brilliant, creative designers have come up with.”
“In terms of sustainability, we’ve become very indulgent in how much stuff we buy and then how much stuff we discard,” she said.
However, that, she points out, is not a Valentino couture dress: “The skill and craftsmanship involved, and so many people making something so extraordinary — it’s difficult to get the balance right, and I’m not suggesting that should stop, but we need to be more thoughtful as consumers.”
That sentiment is echoed by designers. New York-based designer Maria Cornejo, who has won several awards for sustainability, is currently involved in a collaboration with automaker Hyundai to “upcycle” excess leather from car seats in her designs.
“Nobody is going to stop consuming, but it makes economic and environmental sense to reimagine materials that have had a prior life,” she said.
Unless you are buying a second-hand car, people only buy things because they desire them, not because it is politically correct, Cornejo reasons.
If some companies are jumping on the bandwagon and “greenwashing” their products, that is better than taking no action at all, Cornejo said.
“It’s what has to happen because at least they’re going in the right direction. It’s the future. Everybody has to take some responsibility for what’s going on,” she said.
That message even seems to be filtering through to the red carpet of showbusiness, where the habit of only wearing clothes once for photographs first started before it filtered down to Instagram, fast-fashion and the mass-market.
Fashion glossy US Vogue published a story titled “Earth to A-Listers,” calling on movie stars to bring the sustainability issue to the red carpet during award season following the UN’s “terrifying” climate report.
“Wouldn’t it be powerful to see these same celebrities rewearing gowns they’ve worn in the past — advocating against the throwaway culture that sees consumers toss away garments after a single use, like they do iced-coffee cups?” writer Nicole Phelps asked.
Model Michelle Hicks had her own take on red-carpet tyranny: “It became a rat race to wear the newest, coolest thing. You get photographed in it once and that’s it. And that’s bad.”
This week Hicks is going to fashion editor and stylist Carine Roitfeld’s Harper’s Bazaar party in her own 20-year-old Galliano dress.
“It’s stunning, so why not wear it again? Why not recycle?” she said.
Taiwan’s status in the world community is experiencing something really different; it’s being treated like a normal country. And not just a “normal” country, more like a valuable, constructive, democratic and generous country. This is not simply an artifact of Taiwan’s successes in combatting the novel coronavirus. It is a new attitude, weighing Taiwan’s democracy against China’s lack of it. Before I continue, I should apologize to the readers of the Taipei Times. I have not visited Taipei since the opening of the American Institute in Taiwan’s new chancery building in Neihu last year, so I was unprepared for the photograph
On Sept. 27, 2002, the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste (East Timor) joined the UN to become its 191st member. Since then, two other nations have joined, Montenegro on June 28, 2006, and South Sudan on July 14, 2011. The combined total of the populations of these three nations is just more than half that of Taiwan’s 23.7 million people. East Timor has 1.3 million, Montenegro has slightly more than half a million and South Sudan has 10.9 million. They all are members of the UN, yet much more populous Taiwan is denied membership. Of the three, East Timor, as a Southeast Asian
At a June 12 news conference held by the Talent Circulation Alliance to announce the release of its white paper for this year, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) emphasized that, in this era of globalization, Taiwan should focus on improving foreign language and digital abilities when cultivating talent, so that it stands out from global competitors. I suggest the government should consider building a professional translation industry. If the public believes that there is a relationship between learning English and national competitiveness, then the nation must consider the social cost of language education. This should be assessed to maximise educational effectiveness: Is
There have been media reports that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) plans to hold military exercises in August to simulate seizing the Pratas Islands (Dongsha Islands, 東沙群島) in the South China Sea. In the past, only Coast Guard Administration (CGA) personnel have been stationed there, but the Ministry of National Defense has dispatched the Republic of China Marine Corps to the islands, nominally for “ex-situ training,” to prevent a Chinese attack under the guise of military drills. The move is only a temporary measure and not sufficiently proactive. Instead, the government should officially declare sovereignty over the islands and station troops