China has lots of weapons to deploy to bring Hong Kong’s protesters under control before it needs to send in the troops.
From barring dissident flight attendants to encouraging “patriotic” citizens to confront protesters on the streets, China has unloaded a wide range of firepower against the territory’s fractious opposition in the past few weeks. That is to say nothing of the considerable sway Beijing holds over local politics, with its own loyalist bloc in the elected legislature and veto power over all top appointments.
Here is a look at some of the tools in China’s arsenal:
POLITICAL INFLUENCE
While Chinese officials continue to reaffirm their commitment to Hong Kong’s “high degree of autonomy,” they have begun to pull the levers of power more directly since some radical protesters attacked the central government’s local headquarters and other symbols of Beijing’s authority.
The Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office — China’s top agency overseeing the territory — has held an unprecedented three briefings on the protests and summoned local representatives to a closed-door meeting in Shenzhen, China, where attendees say officials batted away appeals for compromise.
The moves demonstrate the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) ability to reach deep into the territory’s politics without resorting to military force, even if they reinforce arguments that local control is being eroded.
China has also lodged formal diplomatic complaints with countries that have supported the protests, accusing the US and the UK of meddling.
On Tuesday, it was revealed that a UK consular worker from Hong Kong had been detained while returning from a trip to the mainland earlier this month.
DEPENDENT BUSINESSES
China has repeatedly shown its willingness to use its leverage as the world’s largest trading nation to express political displeasure, as South Korea, Canada, Norway and others can attest.
Hong Kong, which conducts more than 40 percent of its trade via the mainland, is particularly vulnerable.
Last week, Rupert Hogg (何杲) resigned as Cathay Pacific Airways’ chief executive officer after China’s regulators banned all crew who participated in “illegal demonstrations” from mainland flights.
Meanwhile, local tycoons including Hong Kong’s richest man, Li Ka-shing (李嘉誠), came off the sidelines to publish statements and purchase advertisements urging an end to violent protests.
At the same time, queries on Chinese e-commerce portals, such as Alibaba Group Holding’s Taobao, returned unsuccessful results for people seeking to ship umbrellas, masks and helmets to Hong Kong, where they have become common tools of protesters.
PROPAGANDA MACHINE
Even if Beijing has no intention of deploying troops, it can unleash a vast state-run media apparatus to raise fears that it might.
Chinese media have circulated photographs and reports of Chinese troops and paramilitary riot-control forces training in scenarios resembling Hong Kong’s protests.
The government claims that the protests are the product of foreign “black hands” such as the US and the UK are widely circulated, helping lay the ground for any more direct intervention.
Moreover, the uglier parts of the protests, such as petrol bombs thrown at police stations or the defacement of national emblems, are amplified for most of the mainland’s 1.4 billion citizens. Reports have frequently compared the protests to “terrorists” and “rioters” — a label used to justify the Tiananmen Square Massacre in 1989.
Beijing’s nationwide censorship system known as the Great Firewall helps ensure that developments that might generate sympathy for the movement, including outbreaks of beatings by triad-linked mobs, go largely unmentioned.
’UNITED FRONT’
Long before regaining control over Hong Kong in 1997, the CCP built a deep support network that it can call for support in times of trouble, including business groups, labor unions, neighborhood associations and several pro-establishment political parties.
This “United Front” plays a key role in organizing counterprotests to support the police and the government, events that receive favorable play in the territory’s numerous Beijing-aligned commercial media outlets.
The growing global reach of such groups — ostensibly aimed at overseas Chinese — has drawn accusations of political meddling in places such as Canada and Australia, where they have turned out to oppose causes disputed by Beijing.
The groups have helped China counter rallies organized around the globe to support Hong Kong’s protests, seen by clashes in Sydney and Melbourne on Friday last week. Canadian police on Sunday last week escorted worshipers out of a Vancouver church, after Beijing supporters surrounded a prayer meeting for Hong Kong.
TRIAD SUPPORT
While the Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office has urged an end to all violence in the protests, the agency has also urged Hong Kong residents to “stand firm and guard our beautiful homeland,” and warned demonstrators that “those who play with fire will perish by it.”
Such comments have fueled concern that Beijing is at least tolerant of other, more aggressive moves against protesters.
In the past few weeks, groups of stick-wielding men, often dressed in matching white shirts, have turned out on the streets to assault protesters. People have shot fireworks at rallies from passing cars.
On Tuesday, a man was arrested while attempting to enter the mainland in connection with a knife attack on three people near a protest message wall.
Protesters and opposition lawmakers have blamed the attacks on notorious Chinese organized crime gangs known as triads, and police said that several people with links to the groups were among those arrested after one particular shocking attack last month.
They have accused the police of colluding with the gangs, something the Hong Kong government has denied.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath