Nearly half the world’s people are living in countries where their freedom of speech and right to privacy are being eroded, researchers have found.
“Strongman” regimes seeking to squash voices of dissent and solidify political power are increasingly monitoring citizens through technology, cracking down on protests and jailing journalists, according to a ranking of 198 countries on issues including mass surveillance and data privacy.
The report, launched on Thursday by global risk analysis company Verisk Maplecroft, found that about 3.38 billion people, or about 46 percent of the global population, live in countries deemed to be at “extreme risk” in relation to right to privacy and freedom of expression.
Out of 198 countries, 58 were categorized as “extreme risk” when it came to citizens’ right to privacy, a jump of 9 percent from 2017 levels.
The same number of countries were ranked as “extreme risk” in the report’s freedom of opinion and expression index.
The rise from 52 in 2017 to 58 this year represents an increase of 11 percent.
However, just 28 countries were identified as “extreme risk” on the democratic governance index, which identifies and measures authoritarian regimes.
The figures represent a “worrying” trend in the global erosion of rights and freedoms that goes “beyond the most hardcore autocratic states,” the report said. “This tells us that more countries are now prioritizing control of the public narrative and the quashing of public dissent above the rights of citizens.”
The report highlights Cambodia , where national elections last year prompted Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen, who has been in power for 34 years, to crack down on “fake news” by fining offenders and jailing them for two years.
Hun Sen has also strangled dissenting speech online by extending cybersurveillance, and ordered all Internet traffic to be transmitted through a state-owned data management center.
The report gave China the lowest aggregate score for freedom of expression and right to privacy.
Home to one-fifth of the world’s Internet users, the nation already faces the most severe Internet restrictions.
However, the study warns of the affect the 2020 rollout of the controversial social credit system — a mass surveillance program that gives citizens a social credit score based on their social, political and economic behavior — could have within and beyond the country’s borders.
In Turkey, more journalists were jailed last year than in any other country, the Committee to Protect Journalists has said.
The Turkish government last week destroyed more than 300,000 books linked to a failed military coup in 2016; last year, a report from the PEN International found that 200 media outlets and publishing organizations had been shut down, 80 writers subjected to investigations and prosecutions, and more than 5,800 academics dismissed from 118 public universities.
Cambodia, Djibouti, Kenya, Somalia, Tanzania and Zambia have all dropped into the “extreme risk” in terms of right to privacy.
Countries that were classified as at “extreme risk’ on freedom of expression included Kyrgyzstan, Morocco, Mozambique, Papua New Guinea, Qatar, Uganda and Venezuela.
Sofia Nazalya, Verisk Maplecroft’s human rights analyst, said that US President Donald Trump’s increasingly authoritarian stance on media freedoms risked encouraging similar behaviors in other countries where freedom of expression and right to privacy are already the subject of concern.
“What’s happening with Trump and his anti-media stance is contradictory to how we think a leader of a democratic nation should act and it does set a dangerous precedent for other countries to be more open in criticizing the press,” Nazalya said.
The report also underscored human rights abuses in China’s Xinjiang region, where an estimated 1 million ethnic Uighurs have been held in detention centers.
The report warns multinational companies of tainted apparel supply chains.
China is the world’s largest producer of cotton, with three-quarters produced in Xinjiang, and the industry has been linked to forced labor .
Yet companies seeking to clean up their supply chains could find the process extremely difficult, Nazalya said.
“Conducting standard due diligence may prove problematic for the region, as the Chinese government will likely make any manufacturing that occurs in the region untraceable to other supply chains,” she said. “This situation is fairly unique. It will pose a real challenge for companies as it constitutes a major reputational issue for those that are caught up.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing