High-ranking Polish politicians used a side door to get to the VIP section of Sowa & Przyjaciele, a posh Warsaw restaurant.
Sealed off from other patrons, government ministers and lawmakers felt free to speak their minds while enjoying continental cuisine and wine at taxpayers’ expense.
However, privacy was an illusion, the special dining room a trap.
Illustration: Mountain People
For about a year, waiters secretly recorded public officials at Sowa & Przyjaciele and another restaurant, Amber Room.
When a news magazine published transcripts from some of the recordings, it spawned a scandal dubbed “Waitergate” that helped topple a pro-EU government.
Suspicions that Russia and the nationalist political party that won Poland’s 2015 election were behind the illegal eavesdropping persisted, even after a Polish multimillionaire was convicted as the mastermind.
With the country’s next election coming up this fall, a Polish journalist and the jailed tycoon have provided fresh fuel for claims that Waitergate was a prelude to Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election.
Grzegorz Rzeczkowski, a respected investigative reporter for the Polityka news magazine, argues in a new book that Russian intelligence services carried out the restaurant buggings on behalf of the Kremlin.
He also presents evidence to allege that Polish intelligence figures conspired to use the recordings to bring the right-wing Law and Justice party (PIS) to power.
In his book, In a Foreign Alphabet: How People of the Kremlin and PIS Played with the Eavesdropping, Rzeczkowski maintains that, just as with the US election meddling that former US special counsel Robert Mueller called “sweeping and systematic,” Russia’s goal with Waitergate was to weaken the West.
“It was to open the road to power for the anti-Western, anti-liberal, anti-democratic opposition of the time. Russia had a full, spectacular success,” Rzeczkowski told a Polish parliamentary panel last month.
The panel stemmed from an opposition lawmaker’s push to pressure the government to shed light on the alleged Russian connection.
A newspaper subsequently reported that Poland’s counterintelligence service is investigating whether a foreign spy agency played a role.
The Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs has dismissed claims of Kremlin involvement.
“Poland’s political establishment and media community have been working for years to put out a multitude of hoaxes about ‘Russian machinations.’ We see no need to comment on such absurd allegations,” the ministry said.
REHEARSAL
A wariness that Russia is trying to destabilize democracy in central Europe has permeated politics in Poland and neighboring nations since they ended communism after decades under Moscow’s control.
Many have since joined NATO and the EU while more have applied.
When the eavesdropping scandal broke five years ago, then-Polish prime minister Donald Tusk immediately pointed to Russia.
His remark would give Rzeczkowski his book title.
“I do not know in which alphabet this scenario was written, but I know exactly who could be the beneficiary,” Tusk said.
Tusk became president of the European Council several months after the scandal unfolded, a job that involves overseeing the common agenda of the EU’s national leaders.
He recently said he was more convinced now of “the Russian track in this whole affair.”
The coal tycoon’s arrest in Spain and recent extradition to Poland has added to the intrigue.
Polish prosecutors accused Marek Falenta, 43, of recording the politicians to punish the government for trying to block imports of Russian coal.
He fled before starting a two-and-a half year prison sentence.
After his capture, Falenta threatened to expose Law and Justice members for allegedly recruiting him in the recording plot if he did not receive a presidential pardon, according to letters leaked to Polish newspapers.
He told the president, prime minister and the powerful ruling party leader he expected better treatment in return for helping them. Government officials have called the letters an act of desperation from an untrustworthy source.
They refused to respond to requests by The Associated Press for comment on the allegations of Russian responsibility for Waitergate.
Dozens of politicians had hundreds of hours of conversations illegally recorded at the two restaurants between June 2013 and June 2014.
Poland’s government, led at the time by Tusk’s centrist Civic Platform party, had declared a fight against Russian coal imports and was a strong advocate for the Western course that activists were agitating for in Ukraine.
The leaked recordings proved deeply embarrassing for Tusk’s government and strained ties with Washington.
They included the then-minister of foreign affairs complaining that Poland’s alliance with the US “wasn’t worth anything” and put Poland, metaphorically speaking, in the position of performing oral sex.
The minister, Radek Sikorski, resigned along with three others four months before the 2015 election.
2016 PERFORMANCE
Sikorski on Sunday said that, back in 2014, there were no US troops yet in Poland as there are now and said, “I doubted the efficacy of the alliance.”
However, he said the transcript was manipulated by the magazine Wprost to suggest he called the alliance “bullshit” when he only used that word to describe limited US participation in a single NATO exercise.
Now a European Parliament member, Sikorski criticized US officials for not taking Waitergate as a warning.
“We were a laboratory for what happened in the United States, and the US was too arrogant to take heed,” said Sikorski, who says Russian hacking group Fancy Bear sent him one of the e-mails that would compromise former US secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton’s presidential campaign in 2016. “We saw it coming. It was successfully tested in Poland.”
Under the conservative Law and Justice government that came to power in 2015, Russian coal imports have doubled.
Signs of democratic backsliding, such as government encroaching on the independence of Poland’s judicial system, have caused tensions with the EU. Warsaw has almost ceased to be an advocate for Ukraine.
Central to Rzeczkowski’s theory is the former manager of Sowa & Przyjaciele, who waited on officials in the VIP room.
Referred to only as Lukasz N because of Poland’s privacy law, he previously managed another Warsaw restaurant, Lemongrass, across the street from the US embassy.
Lemongrass was established by the director of the Polish branch of Russian energy giant Lukoil with money from Russian organized crime, Rzeczkowski said.
He said counterintelligence sources told him the restaurant was a front to spy on Americans and when the cover story was blown, two Russians bought the place.
Two other businessmen with Kremlin connections opened Sowa & Przyjaciele in 2012 in cooperation with star chef Robert Sowa, the journalist said. The manager, Lukasz N, sent Polish politicians text messages inviting them to sample Sowa’s modern European dishes.
Rzeczkowski said other alleged links between Sowa & Przyjaciele and Russians in organized crime suggest that Falenta, the convicted Polish tycoon, did not organize Waitergate, but had a supporting role.
Polish media reported last year that Falenta had a multi-million dollar debt to a Russian coal company, KTK.
A leading Polish police investigator on the recordings case got a top security job at KTK after a police investigation early on in the probe found no evidence of Russian involvement.
Tomasz Piatek, another journalist who investigates links between Polish political figures and Russia, said Rzeczkowski’s evidence is overwhelming, but he thinks fear and denial keep the truth about Waitergate from getting the attention it deserves.
“It’s a reason for pride for Poles to say we freed ourselves from Russian domination. To admit that Russians are still here and that we are still controlled by them is hard,” Piatek said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing