The July 21 anti-extradition bill demonstration in Hong Kong showed another kind of “two systems.”
Traditionally, demonstrations start at Victoria Park at 3pm. In the past, protesters would reach Admiralty or Central districts before dispersing by subway, but the July 21 march was ordered by police to end at Luard Road i n Wan Chai.
There is no subway station there, so the crowd had to move forward. Indignant protesters continued all the way to Western district and the Liaison Office of the Central People’s Government, targeting the bill’s sponsor, the territory’s arbitrary ruler Chief Executive Carrie Lam (林鄭月娥) and defacing China’s national emblem hanging on the office building.
A large number of police officers fired tear gas, rubber bullets and bean-bag rounds at the protesters, who had learned their lesson from the police violence on June 12 and fought as they moved on before dispersing at about 11:30pm.
On the other side of Hong Kong, in the New Territories’ Yuen Long District, police handed over authority to local crime organizations. At about 9pm, 200 to 300 white-clad men belonging to what they called the “white power,” carrying metal rods and wooden sticks, gathered at Yuen Long MTR Station. They looked for and attacked black-shirted people returning from the demonstration on Hong Kong Island.
Junius Ho (何君堯), a legislator for the New Territories West Constituency and nicknamed “the liaison office’s god-son,” came to the scene and praised the white-clad gang, calling them heroes, while police division commander Li Hon Man (李漢民) thanked them, saying their actions were “much appreciated,” as he left without taking any action to curb the violence.
Prior to the incident, an officer from the Liaison Office also came to a Yuen Long rural committee to stir up the villagers.
This is a classic example of police teaming up with gangs. This time, it led to a two-hour law enforcement vacuum. As the gangsters took “disciplinary action” for what they regarded as “family business,” they lost control and injured dozens of people, some of whom are now in critical condition. A triad leader was so immersed in assaulting people that he had a heart attack, which brought him to the ground and sent him to hospital. No one knows if he will live.
Police cooperating with the triads and behaving as if common people should be killed without mercy echoed Ho’s terrorist-like remark two years ago when he called for independence advocates to be “killed mercilessly.” It is the authorities’ complete failure to probe Ho’s threat that led to the incidents on July 21.
The joining of forces also explains why Lam has opposed a much-demanded independent inquiry into police’s abuse of power — there are so many shady things going on behind the scenes that Hong Kongers worry that whether judges will participate in investigations.
In 2014, Kevin Lau (劉進圖) then-editor-in-chief of the Ming Pao, was assaulted on the street and severely injured. Shortly after the attack, Chinese police in Guangdong Province turned in two suspects without asking them who gave the order. The case was muddled and they were given light sentences. Surely this was planned by the police and organized crime.
It is precisely this kind of cooperation, imitating China’s “criminal socialism,” that has aroused the sense of crisis among Hong Kongers. The Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce, one of the territory’s most patriotic business organizations, issued a statement calling for a formal withdrawal of the extradition bill. The support from the pro-China group indicates why the anti-extradition movement has lasted so long.
In past rallies, organizations would raise less than HK$500,000 (US$63,828). The funds raised this time amount to millions of Hong Kong dollars, showing support garnered from large businesses.
Members of the Law Society of Hong Kong, where Ho served as president, also abandoned its pro-China stance and criticized the bill.
The public’s views were on full display as Yuen Long residents brought clothes to black-clad protesters so they could change and avoid being beaten during the incident.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) always goes against public opinion, but it does so out of fear.
If the non-cooperation movement in Hong Kong continues to develop, it would severely damage Hong Kong’s status as a global financial center and cause the CCP to lose its cash cow, which would intensify the power struggle within the party.
Insistence on treating the public as the enemy would eventually cause Lam and top police officials to be abandoned by friends and allies and cast away when they no longer are of any use.
History is replete with examples of such people.
The Taiwanese version of the “one country, two systems” formula also consists of organized crime and police. There are many precedents in Taiwan, and their planning and organization started during former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) terms in office.
Paul Lin is a political commentator.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing