New Party presidential candidate Yang Shih-kuang (楊世光) made a series of male chauvinist and misogynist statements at a recent news conference.
“I am pro-unification, I am a man. Anyone who is pro-independence is a woman,” “I really want to know if my adversary is a man or a woman” and “[President] Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has no right to talk about the next generation, because she has no children,” were just some of his comments.
Yang thinks that women are incapable of taking on major responsibilities, that being a woman is humiliating and that a woman who has not had a child is incomplete.
Although this series of statements set off a wave of indignation and condemnation, it is very unsettling that despite the fact that same-sex marriage has been legalized and although a woman has been the nation’s president for more than three years, reactionary male chauvinism continues to exist in Taiwan.
Tsai’s achievements are clear for all to see and she would do well in any evaluation of her performance.
Still, she is neither perfect nor a saint, nor has her policy implementation been flawless, but this is something that requires reasonable criticism of her performance, not of her sex.
However, there is a group of people today who think that she is not suitable to serve a second term simply because of her sex, and that is simply absurd.
Ever since antiquity, the contributions of women to state and society have never been inferior to the contributions of men.
Historically, women have led people, they have taken part in academic development and they have reformed societies and cultures. Housewives in traditional families have also made great sacrifices, for family, children, the environment and animal protection.
The power of women must ever be underestimated.
Former US secretary of state Hillary Rodham Clinton said in her concession speech after losing the 2016 presidential election against Donald Trump that she believed that “the future is female,” a phrase that originated as one of the slogans of the lesbian feminist movement in the 1970s.
Hopefully we will continue to see women shine in all sectors of society in the future, but that requires a free and safe national and social environment.
This is the reason all women compatriots working hard to safeguard the sovereignty of Taiwan must speak up and say that: “We are pro-independence, we are women!”
Wu Xin-en is a transfeminist.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath