Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) in 2015 scrapped the annual Double Ninth Festival cash gift for all senior citizens, but his opponents keep trying to bring the outdated practice back. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Taipei City councilors two weeks ago proposed reinstating the holiday gift, but yesterday the city council elected against doing so.
The policy, which is still in place in all other localities in Taiwan, entails giving NT$1,500 to NT$10,000 (US$47.65 and US$318), depending on age, in cash to all people older than 65 and Aborigines older than 55. This cost the Taipei City Government about NT$800 million per year. Under Ko’s revised policy, only older residents from low to lower-middle-income households receive NT$1,500 and those older than 99 receive NT$10,000.
Ko’s policy makes sense on a practical level, as free money should only be given to the needy, not indiscriminately by age. There are other ways for the nation to respect or give back to elders through various discounts, subsidies, programs and services. There is always room for improvement, but reinstating the gifts for all should not be the solution.
It seems like this topic is conveniently brought up in the run-up to elections. Ting Shou-chung (丁守中), Ko’s KMT opponent in the Taipei mayoral election in November last year, strongly emphasized that he would reinstate the cash gift to “turn Taipei into a model city of respect toward the elderly and filial piety.”
Such a “model city” should spend its time and money improving general welfare and services for its older residents; a yearly cash gift is merely a symbolic gesture that would do little to improve their conditions — especially when many people receiving the cash presumably do not need the money. The funds saved should go to improving the lives of Taipei’s senior citizens. The last thing society needs is more symbolic policies.
The majority of Ko’s constituents agree with his stance, as the results of a survey released by the Taipei Research, Development and Evaluation Commission last month showed that 57 percent of Taipei residents support the city’s current policy.
The Taipei Times criticized Ting’s campaign promise as “nothing but an attempt to bribe voters” in an editorial on Nov. 24, 2017, and with the nation looking toward next year’s elections, it is not surprising that KMT city councilors are bringing up this issue once again.
They do not seem to have any convincing arguments. For example, KMT Taipei City Councilor Wang Hsin-yi (王欣儀) said that not giving the money would make Taipei’s older residents feel like “second-class citizens,” as it is the only city in Taiwan not doing so. So the message is that just because everyone else is doing it, it is acceptable to do the wrong thing?
As Ko said, calling for the reinstatement of the cash gifts “is very effective in soliciting votes.” Allowing such issues to become part of the battleground for elections could set a dangerous precedent in which candidates resort to proposing other forms of gifts or cash to reward people for voting for them. It is lazy and shortsighted, and only serves to benefit politicians in the long run.
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
In a Taipei Times editorial published almost three years ago (“Macron goes off-piste,” April 13, 2023, page 8), French President Emmanuel Macron was criticized for comments he made immediately after meeting Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing. Macron had spoken of the need for his country to find a path on Chinese foreign policy no longer aligned with that of the US, saying that continuing to follow the US agenda would sacrifice the EU’s strategic autonomy. At the time, Macron was criticized for gifting Xi a PR coup, and the editorial said that he had been “persuaded to run
The wrap-up press event on Feb. 1 for the new local period suspense film Murder of the Century (世紀血案), adapted from the true story of the Lin family murders (林家血案) in 1980, has sparked waves of condemnation in the past week, as well as a boycott. The film is based on the shocking, unsolved murders that occurred at then-imprisoned provincial councilor and democracy advocate Lin I-hsiung’s (林義雄) residence on Feb. 28, 1980, while Lin was detained for his participation in the Formosa Incident, in which police and protesters clashed during a pro-democracy rally in Kaohsiung organized by Formosa Magazine on Dec.
RSS