Thu, May 30, 2019 - Page 9 News List

New Arab spring stalls as Trump looks away

The US once led Western states’ support of democracy around the world, but under Donald Trump that feels like a long time ago

By Simon Tisdall  /  The Observer

Illustration: Mountain People

There was a time, not so very long ago, when the US was held up as a model for other nations to emulate. That time has passed.

This month has witnessed more gratuitous international hooliganism by US President Donald Trump’s administration. Its latest depredations include extra-territorial bullying of trade and business rivals, violent threats against Iran, an absurdly biased “peace plan” for Palestine, resumed arms sales to fuel the Saudis’ war in Yemen and an assault on global press freedom.

Anger and dismay over Trump’s wildly swinging wrecking ball obscure they ways in which the US could be using its unmatched power to benefit others — but refuses to do so. Its policy is defined by its absences.

Syrian civilians are once again dying in a horrific war Trump has done nothing to halt. Alarm bells are ringing over the climate crisis and mass extinction, yet Trump’s people prefer to focus on economic opportunities afforded by a melting Arctic ice cap.

The US once stood in the vanguard of Western states promoting democratic governance and respect for universal human and civil rights. Its record was imperfect, but at least it tried — most of the time.

Under Trump, authoritarian regimes from Russia and Egypt to Brazil, the Philippines, North Korea and Myanmar are not only tolerated, they are positively encouraged. Progressive forces that counted on Washington’s support, and the example of the US, can no longer do so.

Nowhere is this more evident than in Sudan right now, where the people’s revolt that began in December last year against then-president Omar al-Bashir’s military-backed regime is at risk of failing.

Despite its size and strategic importance, Sudan receives scant attention in the West. Yet, when consideration is given to its passionate quest for democracy, its internal struggles with Islamic militants and the possibility it could explode into civil war, such as in Syria, Libya and Yemen, that neglect looks short-sighted.

The US record in Sudan is mixed. Then-US president Bill Clinton bombed Khartoum in 1998 over alleged connections with al-Qaeda. Washington helped broker the 2005 comprehensive peace agreement that foreshadowed South Sudan’s independence. Until recently, it maintained sanctions on the regime.

Now, with al-Bashir under arrest and the military off balance, a rare chance has arisen to help move Sudan firmly into the democratic camp.

Yet what is the US doing? If anything, it is pushing the other way.

Foreign diplomats and analysts describe US policy as confused or non-existent. Relations between the Sudanese Professionals Association (SPA), the opposition’s organizing force, and the US embassy in Khartoum are said to be strained.

One opposition official told Foreign Policy magazine that talking to the US was “a waste of time.”

A meeting in Washington earlier this month of Western nations, the UN and the African Union failed to agree on a joint course of action.

Rather than seize the moment, the US — and by default, Britain, the former colonial power — has passed the initiative to Trump’s hard-faced buddies in Saudi Arabia, Egypt and the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

These nations backed al-Bashir and are now backing — and financing — attempts to revive the pre-coup “status quo” under new leadership.

Sudan’s protesters were clear from the start that the regime, and not just its senior figures, must change. It is this crucial battle they are in danger of losing.

Comments will be moderated. Keep comments relevant to the article. Remarks containing abusive and obscene language, personal attacks of any kind or promotion will be removed and the user banned. Final decision will be at the discretion of the Taipei Times.

TOP top