Kaohsiung City Council question-and-answer sessions with the mayor and city government department heads serve a legitimate purpose, but recently they have descended into political theater.
Kaohsiung Mayor Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) has failed to learn the valuable lesson placed before him and has allowed the spectacle to snowball. Some city councilors, smelling blood, have exacerbated the situation. The media have been eager to capitalize on it.
The residents of Kaohsiung deserve better.
Yesterday morning, New Power Party Kaohsiung City Councilor Huang Jie (黃捷) directed her questions at the department heads, instead of first asking the mayor, as is the common practice. Huang later said that it was better to simply “dial the extension number than go through the operator,” and that it was a waste of time asking Han.
On May 3, Huang rolled her eyes when it became apparent that Han was unable to provide answers about his idea for free economic pilot zones.
On Thursday last week, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Kaohsiung City Councilor Kang Yu-cheng (康裕成) ended a testy exchange with the mayor by saying: “I do not know how I can continue, as Mayor Han seems clueless about all of my questions.”
On Monday, DPP Kaohsiung City Councilor Lin Chih-hung (林智鴻) sought to push the point further home with a barrage of 20 questions, testing Han over details such as what is Kaohsiung’s northernmost administrative district, which district has the lowest population and which deity is worshiped at Wujia Longcheng Temple.
No doubt Lin’s idea was to highlight gaps in Han’s knowledge of the city’s geography and policies, but critics could legitimately accuse him of putting on a show. He knew Han would not be able to answer, but Han is not a Kaohsiung native and has only been in the job for four months.
Han had no intention of answering and merely delegated to the relevant department head. Before he sat down after each response, he made sure to punctuate his answer with his now-familiar riposte: “Enrich Kaohsiung.” At one point he punched the air with both hands, like a boxer having executed the perfect knockout. The media lapped it up: It makes for excellent political theater and is great click bait.
Huang was right to have questioned Han on the pilot zones proposals. Having shown his ignorance, the mayor had the opportunity to reflect on this and prepare prior to the next session. He clearly did not, and his opponents honed in on his shortcomings. Under Lin’s questioning, he resorted to rather childish tactics to divert attention from his ignorance. He fully deserved being slighted by Huang yesterday.
His advisers were likely concerned about how this was affecting his “brand.” Cue ridiculous diversionary moves, such as declaring that he would govern from Kaohsiung if elected president, or a story that a publisher was considering creating a superhero out of him. The comic character idea is genius, as superheroes rely entirely on a suspension of belief to work, as does the possibility of believing that Han is presidential material.
The idea of a president working out of Kaohsiung simply to accommodate Han’s wishes of not being seen as abandoning the city that he promised to transform speaks of gargantuan narcissism and irresponsibility. That narcissism is aided and abetted by the media attention for every move he makes.
To the media: Do not make a joke out of Han, perpetuate his “brand” or continue to drive the “Han wave.” Instead, hold him to account, scrutinize his words and record, and demand more substance from him, as Huang has done.
To Han: Show your real substance, govern the city you were elected to govern for the full term and show people what you can do. Then you could consider the presidency.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath