Some crises take us by surprise. They seem to come out of nowhere, suddenly creating upheaval and a desperate scramble to respond. Other crises are manifest, but there is no single point of eruption. The factors that fuel them intensify until the moment comes when we realize — too late — the gravity and the urgency of the situation.
The Sahel and the broader region of northern sub-Saharan Africa is a crisis of the latter kind. We know what is coming. The warning signs are all there. The evidence is gathered. The international community has recognized the need to confront the problem.
However, despite our efforts, it is obvious we must do more.
If and when the eruption comes — as it surely must without a change of policy — the consequences will include fresh waves of extremism and migration, affecting Europe and spreading further afield to the US and Arabia. These waves could be even larger than those from the Middle East in the wake of Syria’s civil war and the breakdown of the Arab Spring.
The five countries usually included in the Sahel — Mauritania, Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger and Chad — are part of a wider geographic area that stretches across Africa from the Atlantic coast in the west through northern Nigeria to Sudan in the east.
The population of these five countries, roughly 80 million, is the fastest-growing of any group of countries. It is estimated that by 2030 the population of Niger will rise from more than 21 million today to 35 million; Burkina Faso will have 27 million, up from just more than 19 million today.
Poverty in the region is chronic and climate change is compounding it. Governance capacity is weak. The development challenges are massive.
As a result, radicalization and extremism are on the march. In just the past six months, terror attacks in Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger have killed nearly 5,000 people in 1,200 incidents, already a significant increase on the previous year.
It would be unfair to say that the international community has ignored the issue or not understood its importance. As the region’s problems have grown in recent years, there have been military interventions, not least by France.
The Sahel countries have created their own coordination body, the G5 Sahel, and the international community has created the Sahel Alliance, which brings together leading players and donors, with the participation of major European countries and the US.
However, the blunt truth is that the situation is deteriorating, despite widespread recognition of the mounting danger.
True, individual countries are stepping up their assistance efforts, but addressing this crisis requires a comprehensive, fully coordinated effort.
At present, discussions are coordinated in various forums, but initiatives remain too ad hoc — worthy in themselves, but suboptimal in impact unless brought together as part of a coherent strategy.
What I learned over time about such situations is that the crucial determinant of whether they can be mastered is the bandwidth of focus among the critical players. That bandwidth is found when the crisis overwhelms.
However, it rarely exists when the crisis could still be averted.
Of course, parts of the international community are responding as they should. French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Angela Merkel have committed to action, and UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres is highly focused.
However, many of the leading players are missing in distraction. Britain is beset by Brexit, Europe by myriad internal debates and the US by its politics.
The Sahel countries, despite huge efforts, cannot avert the coming crisis on their own. When I visited Ouagadougou, the capital of Burkina Faso, the valiant nature of the government’s combat of the security threat was clear, but there was no concealing the monumental nature of the challenge it faces.
My organization, the Institute for Global Change, works on program delivery in many of the countries near the Sahel. In virtually all of my conversations with these countries’ leaders, anxiety over what is happening there is now uppermost.
Two immediate steps are urgently required.
First, a high-level international meeting of the countries in the Sahel Alliance, together with other interested parties, such as the Persian Gulf states and multilateral institutions, should generate pledges and commitments of support that are properly integrated into one comprehensive plan for the region.
Each aspect — development, governance, infrastructure, investment, counter-extremism and security — should be targeted, with countries working together and not replicating one another’s efforts. No donor will give up control of its contributions, but everyone’s contributions should be strategically aligned.
Second, in exchange for such support, the Sahel countries themselves should commit to the reforms and measures necessary for the support to be effective.
In other words, averting a crisis requires a genuine partnership in which both sides have core responsibilities, as well as a proper mechanism for follow-up and implementation.
We should be in no doubt about what is likely to happen should we fail to act. The Sahel is a powder keg and a fuse lit by extremism is burning at an accelerating pace.
The world’s leaders must focus long enough to conceive the right plan and create the right mechanism to implement it. It would be a very sensible precautionary use of bandwidth.
Tony Blair, who was British prime minister from 1997 to 2007, is chairman of the Institute for Global Change.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath