When Google’s boss sits down with a top US military official on Wednesday, the conversation will likely center on Google’s presence in China — particularly a lab that might be more trouble for the company than it is worth.
Sundar Pichai, chief executive officer of Alphabet’s Google, is to meet in Washington with General Joseph Dunford, chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, according to a person familiar with the situation.
The Internet giant extended the invitation after criticism from Dunford about Google’s artificial intelligence (AI) work in China, which he said “indirectly benefits the Chinese military.”
Illustration: Yusha
Dunford cited an AI lab that Google opened in Beijing in late 2017.
Less than two years later, the small office is causing a massive headache for Google, sitting at the locus of a collision between the company’s global ambitions and the US military’s mounting unease over China’s technical might.
A spokesman for the US Department of Defense confirmed that Dunford is scheduled to meet with a senior Google official this week, but declined to provide further details.
Representatives from Google did not respond to requests for comment.
Google will also brief staff of the US Senate’s Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs today about its work in China and with the Pentagon, according to a spokesman for the committee chairman, US Senator Ron Johnson.
The conflict is a risk to Google’s cloud-computing business, which relies on the company’s AI prowess and is a major source of future revenue growth outside of advertising.
The Pentagon and China are huge potential buyers of Internet-based services, a multibillion-dollar market. Google’s chief rivals in the cloud business, Amazon.com and Microsoft Corp, have aggressively courted both buyers.
However, Google has not. In the past year, the Mountain View, California-based company bowed out of an AI contract with the Pentagon while expanding its search for new businesses in China.
Those simultaneous moves were met with fevered backlash in Washington.
Lawmakers grilled Google about its plans in China and the Pentagon, concerned about China’s national investment in AI technology, has launched a public campaign to shame the company.
Two weeks ago, Google issued a statement saying it “was not working with the Chinese military” after US President Donald Trump criticized the company in a tweet on March 16.
Google withdrew its search engine and most other services from China in 2010, citing censorship concerns, but has maintained advertising sales and software-engineering offices there.
By the time Google opened its Beijing lab, the company had just sealed a deal that underscored its willingness to work with the US military.
In September 2017, Google was awarded portions of a contract for Project Maven, a Pentagon initiative to use image-recognition technology to analyze drone footage, according to a report in Gizmodo.
Two months later, Google announced the Beijing AI center. Like many decisions at the company, this was driven by a desire to hire the best coders. Google has spent the past five years signaling to investors and the public that it is the world’s leading AI company, but it needs talented engineers to maintain this lead.
“AI and its benefits have no borders,” Li Feifei (李飛飛), the Google executive then running the Beijing lab, wrote in a 2017 blog post announcing the center. “And we want to work with the best AI talent, wherever that talent is, to achieve it.”
Technicians in AI are particularly rare and expensive, and many of them are in China.
Li, a Chinese-born computer scientist, cited a statistic that almost half of the research in scientific journals on AI came from Chinese authors.
At the time, Li ran research for Google’s cloud division, and she placed Li Jia (李佳), one of her deputies, in charge of the Beijing center.
Google has since held talks about starting to sell its cloud services in China, Bloomberg News reported in August last year.
So far, the company has mostly given away technology free.
A main focus of Google’s AI lab is supporting TensorFlow, an open-source coding library that lets engineers and companies more easily run AI programs that automate tasks or handle reams of data.
For Google, the tool is a critical way to gain the allegiance of software developers, who might end up paying Google for cloud services later.
Last year, Amazon and Microsoft announced their own AI labs in China. Unlike Google, those two companies already sell cloud services in China. Amazon has even promoted its government work — an Amazon Web Services presentation from last year lists 33 public-sector customers in China.
Amazon and Microsoft have also pursued cloud deals with the US military, while Google retreated from the Maven contract after employee protests.
Some Google engineers even refused to work on an “air gap” security feature last year that would have helped the company compete for sensitive military contracts.
“This is not about me and Google,” Dunford said on March 21 at an event hosted by the Atlantic Council think tank. “This is about us looking at the second and third-order effects of our business ventures in China, Chinese form of government and the impact it’s going to have on the United States’ ability to maintain a competitive military advantage.”
A Pentagon spokesman said that Dunford does not have any meetings planned with other technology companies at this time.
As for Google’s Beijing lab, its founding managers have left. The Web site for the lab describes it as working on education initiatives, “user experience” and the development of Tensorflow.
Just over two weeks ago, the Web site offered another description, according to a version of the page saved by the Internet Archive’s Wayback Machine: “We’re developing a world-class research effort dedicated to creating artificial intelligence solutions to real-world problems.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath