Just when poverty-reduction efforts around the world were already slowing, recent forecasts indicate that the global economy is heading into a period of deepening uncertainty. That makes measures to boost growth and expand economic opportunity all the more urgent — which is why revitalizing trade must be high on the global policy agenda.
The evidence is clear: as an engine of economic growth and a critical tool for combating poverty, trade works.
With today’s trade tensions, it is easy to lose sight of the progress the world has made over the past few decades of economic integration. Since 1990, more than 1 billion people have lifted themselves out of poverty, owing to growth that was underpinned by trade.
Today, countries are trading more and deepening economic ties even faster than in past decades.
More than 280 trade agreements are in place around the world, compared with just 50 in 1990. Back then, trade as a share of global GDP was about 38 percent; in 2017, it had reached 71 percent.
Open trade is particularly beneficial to the poor, because it reduces the cost of what they buy and raises the price of what they sell. As new research from the World Bank and the WTO makes clear, farmers and manufacturing workers earn more income when their products can reach overseas markets.
In Vietnam, for example, a series of trade reforms in the 1980s and 1990s helped transform the country into an export powerhouse, sharply reducing poverty there. Today, Vietnam’s exports generate 30 percent of its enterprise-sector employment; and its trade-to-GDP ratio — a key indicator of an open economy — is approximately 200 percent, the highest among all middle-income countries.
Likewise, a separate study of manufacturing in 47 African countries found that employees at export-oriented firms earned 16 percent more than workers at non-exporting firms. While men and women working at trading firms received similar wages, men at non-trading firms earned more than women.
Evidence like this demonstrates the promise of open trade, but the poor do not benefit from trade automatically. Our research points to serious challenges.
For example, some groups of workers might lose income as a result of increased import competition, while others encounter “behind the border” barriers — such as limited competition in transportation and distribution, weak infrastructure, or lack of information about new opportunities — that can negate the benefits of trade.
Finally, our research shows that trade can have an uneven impact on the poor, depending on specific circumstances such as access to trade-supporting infrastructure, gender, or whether people live in a rural or urban area.
Such dynamics are clearly discernible in India, where goods produced in rural households face a tariff rate in international markets that is 11 percentage points higher than that for goods produced in urban households.
Similarly, on the border of Laos and Cambodia, women pay higher taxes to customs officials, and their goods are more likely to be quarantined than those that are traded by men.
In Uganda, where 70 percent of the population is employed in agriculture, the low quality and high cost of transportation prevents most producers from getting their products into the hands of foreign customers.
With appropriate trade reforms, governments can loosen such constraints, while also lowering transaction costs, promoting competition and setting clear rules for cross-border commerce.
We know that open trade can drive development, but passively counting on exports to boost economic growth and reduce poverty is not enough.
We need to push harder for reforms to lower tariff barriers and remove trade-distorting regulatory measures, and more must be done to facilitate investment in infrastructure, such as roads, shipping routes and e-commerce systems that connect people to markets.
Unfortunately, WTO forecasts show that the growth of global trade is slowing, imperiling prospects for faster economic growth and poverty reduction.
We urgently need to address the roots of global trade tensions, strengthen the rules-based trading system and pursue further trade liberalization.
Experience shows that this is the most effective way to drive inclusive and sustainable economic growth, create new opportunities, and bring us closer to our shared goal of finally ending extreme poverty.
Caroline Freund is director of trade, regional integration and investment climate at the World Bank Group. Robert Koopman is chief economist and director of the Economic Research and Statistics Division at the WTO, and a professor at the Graduate Institute in Geneva.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) wrapped up his visit to the People’s Republic of China, he received his share of attention. Certainly, the trip must be seen within the full context of Ma’s life, that is, his eight-year presidency, the Sunflower movement and his failed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, as well as his eight years as Taipei mayor with its posturing, accusations of money laundering, and ups and downs. Through all that, basic questions stand out: “What drives Ma? What is his end game?” Having observed and commented on Ma for decades, it is all ironically reminiscent of former US president Harry