The Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics earlier this month forecast that US-China trade tensions could weigh on exports this year, slowing economic growth to 2.27 percent, from 2.6 percent last year. However, more than the trade dispute, a faster cooling of China’s economy might hurt Taiwan to a greater extent than its regional neighbors, which is pushing the government to step up construction of public infrastructure, boost domestic consumption and encourage private investment.
Private investment — and the repatriation of capital by Taiwanese companies — could increase if investment barriers such as land, labor and electricity shortages were removed.
Since last year, Taiwanese businesses have increasingly opted to repatriate earnings from overseas operations due to stringent business conditions in China, and because they want to circumvent the high taxes in many countries following the implementation of the Common Reporting Standard — a framework for the global exchange of tax data.
Private investment could expand 4.31 percent this year, after growing 3.17 percent last year, if the government worked to eliminate barriers and facilitate capital repatriation, according to an Academia Sinica projection from December last year.
Capital repatriation would boost weak domestic demand more effectively than relying on the formalization of free-trade agreements with other countries, and a bill to regulate the repatriation of offshore capital is reportedly a priority in this legislative session.
At a Cabinet meeting last week, Premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) was briefed about the planned tax benefits for companies and individuals who repatriate money, as well as the investment categories allowing for tax breaks or exemptions, local media reported. The Executive Yuan is to present the special bill to President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) when it is finalized, the reports said.
Meanwhile, legal interpretations issued by the Ministry of Finance at the end of last month and remarks made by ministry officials have sought to clarify businesses’ questions about capital repatriation, especially what types of foreign-sourced income they must pay taxes on and whether they might become tax targets.
The government is eyeing how to repatriate capital to revitalize the economy, while businesses are eyeing what tax incentives might be up for grabs.
Further justifying the need for the bill is that, in the final quarter of last year, the nation’s financial account — both direct and portfolio investments — saw a net asset increase of US$17.88 billion. This was the 34th consecutive quarter of capital outflows, bringing aggregate net outflows to US$413.31 billion as of Dec. 31 last year.
One thing is for sure: The government should use a carrot-and-stick approach to regulate repatriated funds. The funds must be placed in special accounts regulated by the government at financial institutions and they need to be directed into specific industries, preventing them from flowing into the real-estate market or financing criminal activities. Controlling money laundering must continue to be a priority for the government in regulating the funds.
However, the funds could enjoy a tax break or exemption in investment categories such as the government’s “five plus two” innovative industries plan or the Forward-looking Infrastructure Development Program.
Certainly, the proposed bill and tax breaks present advantages and disadvantages, and the fairness of any tax breaks remains a concern for those who repatriated funds earlier and those who have always held their funds locally.
However, the bill does present a win-win opportunity for the government, for Taiwanese businesses and for the economy as a whole if the fund inflows can be well-regulated, and used effectively to facilitate innovation and transformation from the perspective of long-term national development.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath