Selfish pilots’ strike
When thinking about the strike by China Airlines (CAL) pilots, the phrase “It takes two to tango” comes to mind.
The airline has repeatedly maintained that the benefits and remuneration packages it gives its employees are above the industry average, and that employees and management had agreed to meet within one year to continue negotiations.
The airline has also criticized the Taoyuan Union of Pilots for arbitrarily going on a strike in the middle of the agreed negotiations process. However, it is CAL’s management that should be taking a long hard look at themselves.
We saw senior officials from the airline appear on TV to utter tough rhetoric in paternalistic tones, but we also heard a spokesman for female pilots say: “This is a media circus, holding a discussion meeting in the middle of the night was originally a joke,” in addition to rash remarks made by others.
Frankly, it would be strange if the management and employees of this company were not butting heads.
The pilots were within their constitutional rights to go on strike and there is no legal requirement to provide advance warning of a strike: They were not doing anything illegal.
However, the law exists to set out minimum acceptable standards of behavior within society. On top of these basic building blocks, there is room for higher standards of behavior, ethics and morality.
The pilots’ union deliberately chose to hold the strike during the Lunar New Year period, well aware that all the other airlines were operating at close to full capacity.
By calling a strike without prior warning, union leaders were acting like terrorists who, in full knowledge that all the windows and doors of a hotel are tightly sealed, set fire to the building and take the occupants hostage, leaving them to cry piteously with no means of escape.
At the same time, the striking pilots showed total disregard for the ensuing disaster that they brought upon their ground staff colleagues, let alone the consequences that their actions had for the wider travel industry. They threw innocent colleagues into the line of fire as a way to achieve their aims.
Not only were their methods highly undesirable, they also meant that it was difficult to garner public support. While they were exercising their legal rights, the pilots’ strike revealed an unsightly and ruthless streak, a selfishness and lack of morality.
The public is generally supportive of workers petitioning for better rights and conditions, but this strike by already generously remunerated pilots will have a negative impact on the future of Taiwan’s labor movements, in particular genuinely disadvantaged workers, and it has hurt social justice.
Tseng Tao-hsiung
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath