For over a decade now, we have witnessed more elections and, simultaneously, less democracy. According to Bloomberg, elections have been occurring more frequently around the world. Yet Freedom House found that 110 countries have experienced declines in political and civil rights over the past 13 years.
As democracy declines, so does our sense of community. In the US, this is evidenced by a looming loneliness epidemic and the rapid disappearance of civic institutions such as churches, eight of which close every day. Though these trends are global in nature, the US exemplifies them in the extreme.
This is no coincidence. As Alexis de Tocqueville pointed out in the 1830s, the US’ founders envisioned a country governed not by shared values, but by self-interest. That vision has since defined the US’ institutions, and fostered a hyper-individualistic society.
A few years ago, when I was launching Spark MicroGrants in East Africa, I watched a group of US students from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology meet with about 50 residents of a Rwandan village who were hoping to convince the Rwandan government to contribute to a project to extend an electricity line to their community (which, to their credit, they eventually did).
One student grilled a community member about why the government, rather than the residents, should pay for the project.
The student was channeling a typically US idea of privatization and access based on individual purchasing power, but that idea can corrode collective and civic engagement, and it seems to be undermining political trust as well.
According to the Pew Research Center, the share of Americans who trust the government dropped by a 55 percentage points between 1958 and 2017, and now sits below 20 percent. Not surprisingly, engagement has also dropped in the same period, with involvement in civic associations falling by half.
Growing distrust in governing institutions has fueled a rise in authoritarian populist movements around the world. Citizens are demanding individual economic security and retreating into an isolationist mentality.
In the 2016 US presidential election, US Senator Bernie Sanders and businessman Donald Trump appealed to an overlapping bloc of voters who are fed up with “the system,” and second and third-generation immigrants turned against newer immigrants.
In countries ranging from Germany to Brazil, voters have flocked to far-right parties not out of love for the candidates, but out of fear of losing power and status.
Yet we know that “user engagement” works, as shown by countless studies and human experiences. For example, in Uganda, an evaluation showed that the more citizens participated in the design of health programs, the more the perception of the healthcare system improved. Direct citizen involvement in the Indonesian government decisionmaking led to higher satisfaction with government services.
By creating more opportunities to engage in civic and political life, we can strengthen trust in our institutions and stem extremism.
Today, though, engagement happens in fits and starts related to political campaigns and policies, such as then US-senator Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign or the Tea Party movement that emerged to oppose him.
After mass shootings, protests in favor of gun-control laws increase, but after a short while, the National Rifle Association exploits fears of government overreach to encourage engagement in the other direction.
Achieving genuine engagement, rather than reacting to issues that are presented by politicians or circumstances, requires new institutions that overcome the barriers to effective civic participation and community-driven change.
While the Western world suffers from over-individualization, the most notable governance and economic innovations are taking place in the global south.
The Rwandan government has introduced policies to encourage grassroots solutions that strengthen citizens’ sense of community and shared accountability. Through monthly community-service meetings, families and individuals work together to build homes for the needy, fix roads and pool funds to invest in better farming practices and equipment.
Imagine if more than 300 million Americans convened every month for a similar purpose. There would be billions more citizen hours invested in neighbor-to-neighbor interaction and citizen action.
This was one of the main effects of the Village Savings and Loan Associations that originated in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Members have access to loans to start small businesses and save for a rainy day. The model works because it leverages neighbor-to-neighbor accountability.
Likewise, from Haiti to Liberia and beyond, community-based health systems have proven effective precisely because health workers know their neighbors and their needs. Community health workers go from home to home, checking in on pregnant mothers and making sure they are cared for.
Each of these solutions uses and strengthens communal accountability through shared engagement.
If we believe in the democratic principle that governments must be accountable to citizens, we should build systems that hold us accountable to each other — and we must engage beyond elections and protests.
We must usher in a new era of community-driven democracy — power must be decentralized and placed in communities. When we achieve community-driven democracy, we will engage with one another and with our governments, not just on special occasions, but because our democracy and freedom depend on us.
Sasha Fisher, an inaugural Obama Foundation fellow, is the founder of Spark MicroGrants.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath