First it sold books. Then it added gadgetry, groceries and chipper virtual assistants — but Amazon.com Inc’s latest expansion will take many shoppers by surprise.
Meet Amazon, aspiring military behemoth.
In the not too distant future, US soldiers might rely on Amazon-run systems to trade intelligence, relay orders and call for help. Drone footage might be scoured for wanted men and women by Amazon software. Defense department quartermasters would use Amazon technology to move ammunition and supplies.
Illustration: Yusha
For Amazon chief executive Jeff Bezos, it is not a question of whether customers will mind his company’s defense ambitions, or of complaints raised by civil liberties advocates. As Amazon’s face and founder casts it, the issue is one of patriotism.
“This is a great country and it does need to be defended,” Bezos said during an October Wired magazine summit. “If big tech companies are going to turn their back on the US Department of Defense, this country is going to be in trouble.”
Now Amazon is the leading contender for a 10-year, US$10 billion project to accelerate the Pentagon’s move into cloud computing.
The department has said that the goal of the Joint Enterprise Defense Infrastructure — widely known by its Star Wars-styled acronym, JEDI — is to increase the US’ “lethality” by replacing its antiquated, segmented information technology systems.
Amazon is widely regarded as the strongest contender for the JEDI contract, which is expected to be inked in the first half of the year, in part because its division Amazon Web Services (AWS) already dominates cloud computing in the US.
One 2017 estimate found that AWS held more than half of the worldwide cloud computing market. AWS hosts top-secret data for the CIA, supports federal agencies from the US Department of Justice to NASA, powers the US’ national immigration case management system and stores hundreds of millions of identity documents.
JEDI is expected to inject modern technology into a creaky system. An audit in November last year found that “systemic flaws” in defense department networks invite hacking and that the department’s finance systems were so disorganized that they could not be audited.
JEDI is a first step toward a system that will handle tasks as diverse as frontline communications, medical records management and scheduling.
The finished system is to move petabytes of data between every continent except Antarctica. Service members at the “tactical edge” are to be equipped with rugged devices enabling them to check into the cloud. Modular data centers are to be deployed to forward bases. The Pentagon hopes those can operate in space.
If Amazon wins the JEDI contract and another contract to open a government e-commerce portal, the company would “vault from being a bit player to becoming one of the 10 most dominant federal contractors, with potential to become one of the largest in relatively short order,” said Steven Schooner, a professor of government procurement law at George Washington University.
Amazon makes no apologies for moving aggressively into the public sector in this way.
“We feel strongly that the defense, intelligence and national security communities deserve access to the best technology in the world and we are committed to supporting their critical missions of protecting our citizens and defending our country,” a spokesperson for the Seattle-based company said in response to a request for comment.
The proposition that Amazon should defend the US can be seen as a logical extension of a mission Bezos laid down in a 1997 letter to shareholders. Amazon targets dysfunctional systems that are not serving customers well — from book distribution, to home delivery to computer networking — and leads their reinvention.
“We will continue to focus relentlessly on our customers,” Bezos wrote. “We will make bold, rather than timid investment decisions where we see a sufficient probability of gaining market leadership advantages.”
Bezos is not the first in his family in the defense sector. His formative influences included his grandfather Lawrence Preston Gise, who is usually described in media accounts as Bezos would have known him — a semiretired rancher showing his grandson how to castrate bulls.
Yet Gise also made his living as a defense researcher and manager during the early days of the Cold War and ultimately ran the New Mexico office of the US Atomic Energy Commission, which was in charge of the US’ civilian and military nuclear programs until the 1970s.
Big tech and the defense industry have been intertwined since World War II, when military funding financed the development of the first all-digital computers, said Margaret O’Mara, a University of Washington history professor.
That connection deepened as defense money flowed to researchers developing software languages, networks, machine learning and artificial intelligence (AI), she said.
“You name it, there’s some defense DNA in there somewhere,” O’Mara said.
AWS made a splash in national security circles in 2013 when it launched a US$600 million cloud network for the CIA and other US intelligence agencies.
John Wood, the CEO of Telos, a Virginia-based cybersecurity firm, likened the contract to the “shot heard ‘round the world.”
“The CIA, arguably the most security conscious organization in the world, decided that they were going to move to the cloud,” Wood said. “That really made the rest of the world stand up and take notice, and ask the question: ‘If it’s good enough for them, why isn’t it good enough for us?’”
Dozens of agencies — from the FBI to the US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency — are now AWS users.
Critics worry both that a “cloud-industrial complex” is forming as large tech companies wade into national security and that rapidly developing technologies could be misused by the military or police. AI-assisted facial recognition software has been an early flashpoint.
Amazon’s move to sell its facial recognition software, Rekognition, to US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) prompted protest from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), a small group of shareholders and about a 100 employees. Bezos was not deterred. AWS sales teams have also pitched Rekognition at defense industry events.
Amazon declined to say which agencies, if any, are using Rekognition. However, it is clear to observers that AWS has the desire to make money off defense and law enforcement customers.
“They’ve been consistent in selling these technologies at trade shows,” said Shankar Narayan of the Washington state affiliate of the ACLU, which in January demanded that Amazon, Alphabet Inc’s Google and Microsoft Corp stop selling artificial intelligence-assisted facial recognition to the US government.
“They demoed it to ICE. The FBI is testing it,” he said.
Amazon asserts that Rekognition can spot Kalashnikovs and faces from a user-selected watch list in near real-time. Image recognition software greatly speeds the review of surveillance footage.
Speaking at an Amazon-organized conference last year, FBI Deputy Assistant Director for Counterterrorism Christine Halvorsen said that analysts combing video of the 2017 Las Vegas massacre could have completed their work in a day if they had access to Rekognition.
Instead, it took weeks to track the shooter’s movements, she said.
Microsoft and Google have, to varying degrees, recognized civil liberties and human rights concerns raised by the new technology. Amazon has largely declined to address the moral dimensions of national security work.
“Amazon really has distinguished themselves as being an actor that doesn’t acknowledge any responsibility and really has doubled down on selling these technologies to the government, the military, as well as law enforcement,” Narayan said.
The company “has largely hewed to the position that their founder has articulated, that society supposedly has this ‘immune response’ to new technologies like these and things will get sorted out on their own,” he said. “That’s an attitude that rests on a great deal of privilege and doesn’t really account for the human lives that are being impacted by this technology in real time.”
Amazon is widely regarded as the strongest contender for the JEDI contract. Competition for JEDI has been bitter. Amazon’s rivals — Oracle Corp, International Business Machines Corp and Microsoft — have protested, unsuccessfully thus far, contract requirements that they claim unfairly favor Amazon.
Oracle, a California tech giant, sued the US federal government in December last year. Attorneys for Oracle suggested that defense department employees with connections to AWS biased the contract in Amazon’s favor.
AWS general manager Deap Ubhi spent a year as a product director for the US Defense Digital Service, a Pentagon’s tech division. The defense department is currently reviewing Ubhi’s work developing the JEDI contract.
The awarding of the contract could reverberate.
It could give the winner a lasting advantage in US government cloud computing — “a monopoly over this area for years to come,” said Neil Gordon of the Project On Government Oversight, a US watchdog group examining federal contracting.
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
On today’s page, Masahiro Matsumura, a professor of international politics and national security at St Andrew’s University in Osaka, questions the viability and advisability of the government’s proposed “T-Dome” missile defense system. Matsumura writes that Taiwan’s military budget would be better allocated elsewhere, and cautions against the temptation to allow politics to trump strategic sense. What he does not do is question whether Taiwan needs to increase its defense capabilities. “Given the accelerating pace of Beijing’s military buildup and political coercion ... [Taiwan] cannot afford inaction,” he writes. A rational, robust debate over the specifics, not the scale or the necessity,
RSS