In recent days, local media reported on the social media postings of an American in Taiwan, who photographed a store in Taipei’s Wanhua District (萬華) that displayed the Nazi swastika flag. This is the latest incident in Taiwan, of which there have been many in recent years, involving the use of the Nazi swastika or Adolf Hitler imagery, including in stores as decoration, in commercial advertising, costumes worn by young people at school or other social events, or in posters and advertisements as part of political activities.
Long-term observers of such incidents are aware that they have occurred for decades and often result in negative international media coverage for Taiwan.
When such incidents occur, the response we often receive from stakeholders, who include those making use of Nazi imagery, as well as government officials trying to respond to the negative publicity, is that no ill-will is intended, that as foreigners we do not understand aspects of Taiwanese culture or that there is nothing to apologize for.
A government official once told us that apologies for such incidents are only necessary to the governments of Israel and Germany, but not to Taiwan’s Jewish community.
On New Year’s Day, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said: “In our rapidly changing world, Taiwan’s best option is to persevere on the path of democracy, and work together with like-minded people around the globe.”
The high value that the people of Taiwan put on human rights and democracy has attracted worldwide attention, and the first step to protecting human rights is to respect others.
We thus hope that the Wanhua store owner who is presently displaying the Nazi flag can understand that even if no ill will is intended, their display of the Nazi flag is an extraordinarily disrespectful act toward the Jewish victims of the Nazis and toward human rights in general.
This message is even more important at a time when anti-Semitism is on the rise around the world, and religious freedom is under attack by repressive governments in Asia, Africa and the Middle East.
In recent years, Taiwan has worked hard to bring about transitional justice and unity across ethnic groups, and the nation is generally accepting of and open to different cultures and religions.
We, along with our members who are long-term residents of Taiwan and work to contribute to Taiwan’s prosperity, are thankful for this.
We hope that we can all respect our differences while working together to safeguard Taiwan’s democracy and freedoms.
To the government officials who pledge each time such incidents occur that there will be greater efforts to educate the public about the Holocaust and why the use of Nazi related imagery is inappropriate, we look forward to action and, as Jewish residents of Taiwan, are eager to assist.
Shlomi Tabib is the rabbi and Ross Darrell Feingold is the chairman of the Taipei Jewish Center.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath