On Friday last week a dead pig was found washed up on Siaociou Islet (小坵嶼) in Kinmen County (金門). This followed the discovery on Monday last week on a beach in Jinsha Township (金沙) of a pig carcass that has since been confirmed to be infected with African swine fever.
Since there are no pig farms in the vicinity, the carcasses probably floated across from China. The flow of currents suggests that they came from areas where China has not reported any outbreaks of the disease, which in turn suggests that China is covering up the situation.
This is not the first time that China has harmed neighboring nations by hiding the truth about an epidemic. In 2003, it suppressed reports about severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), which is caused by the SARS coronavirus and infects humans and certain other animals.
On that occasion, doctors and nurses in Hong Kong treated a Chinese visitor without taking strict protective measures, because they did not know that the patient had SARS. The virus then spread and killed 299 people in Hong Kong, including many healthcare workers.
The greatest share of the blame for that incident lies with Zhang Dejiang (張德江), then-secretary of the Chinese Communist Party’s Guangdong Provincial Committee. Zhang studied economics at Kim Il-sung University in North Korea and later became chairman of the Standing Committee of China’s National People’s Congress.
Zhang never apologized, instead turning the truth on its head by saying that China had helped Hong Kong fight the SARS outbreak. That was when quite a lot of Hong Kongers started to hate China.
Returning to current developments, it appears that China has not honestly informed Taiwan about the swine fever situation, so many parts of China that Taiwan has been led to believe are free of the disease might actually be heavily affected by it.
Premier William Lai (賴清德) has rightly instructed local authorities across the nation to set up emergency response centers. If China is unwilling to tell the world the truth about the extent of the disease’s outbreak, Taiwan might have to protect itself by suspending the “small three links” with China, as well as visits to Taiwan by Chinese travelers, and to stipulate that all goods and mail from China must undergo quarantine inspection at specified offshore locations before being delivered to Taiwan proper or Kinmen.
Only by such measures can China be definitely prevented from destroying Taiwan’s pig-farming industry by transmitting the disease to Taiwan proper.
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army has been following the theory of “unrestricted warfare” since it was proposed in 1999, meaning that it will use any means, fair or foul, to defeat its opponents.
Taiwan cannot afford to be too kindhearted. Travelers who bring Chinese pork products to Taiwan must without exception be deported back to their nations of origin and banned from entering Taiwan for five years.
If Chinese spouses of Taiwanese try to bring in pork products, their resident status should immediately be revoked and they should be deported to China.
If certain media or politicians go on serving as mouthpieces for China, the authorities should look into whether such malicious talk, which threatens public health and security, can be dealt with under the provisions of the National Security Act (國家安全法).
Martin Oei is a political commentator with German and UK citizenship.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS