China’s influence operations
Josh Rogin, a columnist for the Washington Post, sounded the alarm in an article explaining that China’s state-run media companies are rapidly expanding their integration with Western news outlets as part of Beijing’s worldwide foreign-influence campaign. In Washington, lawmakers from both sides are calling out such arrangements and demanding that US media companies make sure they do not become tools of Chinese government propaganda.
“As with all authoritarian regimes, the Chinese Communist Party [CCP] is organized around manipulation and control of information and ideas. Under [Chinese] President Xi Jinping [習近平], the party has rapidly and boldly expanded its efforts to influence discussion about China beyond its borders, in part through the global expansion of state-run media outlets. The goal is to suppress any criticism of the Chinese government and shape the international discussion of China in ways favorable to the party’s interests,” the Post reported.
Beijing is committed to limiting free expression, and any partnership between China’s state media enterprises and those of democracies must take this into account, said Christopher Walker, senior vice president at the National Endowment for Democracy.
Xinhua, China’s largest state-run news agency, last month said that it is expanding cooperation with US news service The Associated Press (AP), many of whose articles appear in the Taipei Times.
AP chief executive Gary Pruitt traveled to Beijing to meet with Xinhua president Cai Mingzhao (蔡名照), who said that “the two news agencies have broad cooperation in areas including new media, the application of artificial intelligence and economic information.”
As readers of the Taipei Times can imagine, Xinhua’s description of this kind of cooperation has raised alarms in the US Congress, where members of the Republican and Democratic parties are newly attuned to Chinese foreign-influence operations inside the US.
“In sharp contrast to the AP’s independent journalism, Xinhua’s core mission is to shape public opinion in ways sympathetic to the CCP’s legitimacy and behavior,” 14 US lawmakers wrote to Pruitt on Dec. 19, Rogin said in his article.
The letter was led by US representatives Mike Gallagher and Brad Sherman, and signed by US senators Tom Cotton, Mark Warner and Marco Rubio.
The lawmakers said that the US Department of Justice this year required Xinhua to register as a foreign agent under the US Foreign Agents Registration Act.
Xinhua functions as an arm of Beijing’s propaganda machine and also “serves some of the functions of an intelligence agency,” the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission’s annual report said last year.
The commission said that Xinhua is rapidly expanding worldwide in an effort to undermine and discredit Western media outlets, and control public discussion of China.
Congress is asking the AP to release the text of its memorandum of understanding (MOU) with Xinhua, reveal what cooperation they are planning and assure lawmakers that Xinhua will not influence AP’s reporting or have access to any sensitive information in AP’s possession.
“As a state-run news agency, Xinhua serves as a mouthpiece for the Chinese Communist Party. Its propaganda mission is wholly distinct from legitimate fact-based journalism,” Gallagher told the Post. “Everything we know about the CCP suggests that it will use this partnership to better shape global public opinion to the detriment of American interests and those suffering under the CCP’s oppression.”
However, AP spokeswoman Lauren Easton told the Post that AP’s agreement with Chinese state media is to allow it to operate inside China and has no bearing on AP’s independence.
“The recent memo of understanding updates a relationship that has been consistently the same since 1972 and opens the possibility for future commercial interactions, similar to agreements AP has with other state news agencies around the world,” she told the Post. “It does not include or envision any sharing of artificial intelligence information, or any other technology.”
Xinhua has no access to AP’s sensitive information and no influence over AP’s editorial products, Easton said.
She declined to say whether AP would release the text of the MOU as the lawmakers requested. The fact that Xinhua and AP cannot even agree on the nature of their cooperation illustrates the concern.
“We need to be certain that this MOU is not an IOU,” Sherman told the Post. “Xinhua uses its bureaus in the US to collect intelligence for Beijing, so it’s common sense that a cooperation agreement with it and the AP should be scrutinized. We need full transparency.”
Name withheld
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath