Pregnant and scared, Yin hides in a house on the outskirts of Phnom Penh — one of an untold number of Cambodian surrogate mothers risking jail time for lucrative payouts from Chinese clients.
The end of China’s one-child policy has driven desperate couples too old to bring a baby to term to poorer nations in the Mekong region, where a “womb-for-rent” industry is brushing up against legal barriers.
Cambodia banned commercial surrogacy in 2016, but still has brokers — and eligible young women — skirting the ban for a price.
Yin, 24, was offered US$9,000 by a Cambodian intermediary to carry a Chinese couple’s baby, a fortune for her rice-farming family in rural Kampong Thom Province, three hours from the capital.
“I hesitated at first because I was afraid of how the girls in my village would look at me,” said Yin, who did not want to give her real name for fear of being discovered.
With money scarce, she agreed and was moved to a house in Phnom Penh to live with other women who underwent the same process.
China — with more than 90 million women eligible for a second offspring after the one-child policy was eased — forbids commercial surrogacy, driving couples yearning for a biological child to Southeast Asian nations where the practice is poorly regulated, but a string of high-profile controversies in Thailand, including custody tussles and a case of a couple accused of abandoning their baby after it was born with Down Syndrome, prompted the nation’s junta to ban it in 2015.
Parents immediately looked across the border to Cambodia, but the government swiftly banned it a year later, worried that women in financial straits could face exploitation.
Industry watchers eagerly wait for legislation in Cambodia that could eventually regulate surrogacy, and protect the women and children from becoming victims of trafficking. Meanwhile, a network of Cambodian and international intermediaries persists in the shadows, with raids and arrests revealing the scale of the demand.
Experts say couples are willing to pay between US$40,000 and US$100,000 to have a child, while the surrogate mother typically gets US$10,000 to US$15,000.
Mariam Kukunashvili had a surrogacy agency in Cambodia before the ban and said there are more than 100 Chinese or other Asian agencies still operating.
She said more regulation, not outright bans, is needed.
“Banning allows [the] industry to run under the table,” said Kukunashvili, director of Georgia-based New Life Global Network.
She added that the Cambodian and Thai governments were putting the young surrogates’ fate in the hands of “complete strangers.”
Critics also say that authorities unfairly place the blame on the women instead of the recruiters when they are caught.
This year, more than 40 surrogate mothers in two different cases were arrested in Phnom Penh and charged with human trafficking. In one case, 32 pregnant women were allowed bail once they promised under threat of imprisonment “not to give up” the babies.
“These women are victims of unethical agents and if illiterate, are unlikely to even understand the ban in place in Cambodia,” said Sam Everingham, director of Australian non-profit Families Through Surrogacy.
For women able to carry babies without detection, they are moved to either Thailand or China to give birth, Everingham said, adding that hospital staff in China can be bribed to issue a birth certificate in the name of the intended mother.
Authorities are working to raise awareness about the ban and its repercussions, especially among vulnerable garment workers in factories throughout Cambodia, said Chou Bun Eng, vice president of the national anti-human trafficking committee.
“We are worried the movement [to recruit them] from factories could be spread if there is no prevention,” she said, explaining that women who were caught as surrogate mothers in the past had been factory workers.
Still she advocates a hard stance against those who run afoul of the law, including the women, who are often impoverished and trying to earn money for their families.
“It is an illegal business and if they still risk doing it, they will face the law,” she said.
Four months pregnant, Yin is growing increasingly nervous about her role in the clandestine operation.
Well into her second trimester, she has a new worry — traveling to a foreign nation.
“Another agent explained to me that I should continue my pregnancy in China,” she said. “He said it is better for my safety and my baby’s.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath