Slogans such as “the two sides of the Taiwan Strait belong to one family” and Kaohsiung mayor-elect Han Kuo-yu’s (韓國瑜) campaign slogan “get the tourists in and sell our goods” are reverberating across Taiwan, but the sad thing is that viruses will probably get here first and “the two sides of the Taiwan Strait will have the same diseases.”
A severe African swine fever epidemic has broken out in China, with 22 of the country’s 34 provinces affected. China’s neighbors are on alert, with Taiwan on high alert, as cross-strait exchanges of people and goods are common.
Disease prevention is like fighting a war and when there is a new virus, it is of course a matter of national security. Some pan-blue camp legislators and media outlets are still making irresponsible remarks and are even blocking the government’s attempts to bolster disease prevention measures.
Whether they do what they do intentionally or because they are ignorant, they are still making sure that the two sides of the Taiwan Strait have the same diseases.
If African swine fever enters Taiwan, it will have a destructive impact on the hog, meat, manufacturing and distribution industries, as well as a direct impact on millions of people working in those industries. More than 20 million pork eaters will be unable to eat locally produced pork and the massive harm to Taiwan will be almost unimaginable.
Over the past 20 years, viruses that emerged in China have twice struck in Taiwan. Twenty-one years ago, it was foot-and-mouth disease and 16 years ago, it was severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS).
In 1997, foot-and-mouth disease took a heavy toll on the hog industry. It had an annual output of NT$90 billion at the time, but was almost completely destroyed.
The only effective way to eradicate the virus was to kill infected pigs. The military assisted in the cull and students from National Chung Hsing University, National Taiwan University, National Pingtung University of Science and Technology and other universities took part in disease prevention measures under the guidance of professors. In the end, their joint efforts ended the spread of the disease.
It was a bloody undertaking and everyone cried: the hog farmers, those who killed the pigs and the pigs, and the experience left an indelible impression on everyone who participated in the preventive effort.
Viruses can be difficult to discover, and although a major epidemic was avoided, in 1999, there was yet another medium-sized foot-and-mouth epidemic. A genetic study of the virus showed a 99 percent similarity with a Chinese foot-and-mouth virus, leading to suspicion that the virus entered Taiwan via pork smuggled from China.
Today, the virus still has not been completely eradicated. It was only by July 1 this year that authorities said there was no longer a need to vaccinate against the virus. In July next year, they are to submit an application to the World Organization for Animal Health to have Taiwan removed from the list of areas with foot-and-mouth infections.
The SARS crisis in 2002 and 2003 also began in China, but Beijing covered it up. Although Taipei issued warnings and exhortations, there were people who did not comply, like former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) — Taipei mayor at the time — who was not very cooperative with government warnings.
The first big hospital in Taiwan that had to surrender to the SARS epidemic was Taipei Municipal Hoping Hospital, which was quarantined and closed by the Taipei SARS emergency response task force to combat the spread of the virus following a cluster infection.
It was only after Vice President Chen Chien-jen (陳建仁), who at the time was director-general of the Department of Health — now the Ministry of Health and Welfare — and then-Centers for Disease Control director Su Yi-jen (蘇益仁) led a team of disease prevention experts that the SARS crisis was averted.
The SARS crisis resulted in several deaths and it also affected tourism, travel and air traffic from East and Southeast Asia, dealing a heavy blow to economic growth.
Where did the SARS virus originate? China continues to refuse to admit that it originated there, but after spending a long time following up on the issue, a team from Hong Kong University issued a report in 2013 maintaining that the Chinese horseshoe bat is a natural host of the virus and in 2016, the WHO confirmed that this kind of coronavirus was the source of the SARS epidemic.
Now with African swine fever in China, if Taiwan is going to protect itself, it must take a strict and uncompromising attitude, and border controls must be airtight. Pork products must be stopped at ports and smuggling must be prevented. If the virus still enters Taiwan, through ignorance, selfishness, ill-intent or shamelessness, once again the pain of killing and burning pigs, and closing and disinfecting farms will have to be endured.
However, many people — including Chinese and Taiwanese travelers — continue to bring pork through customs, no matter how many are stopped and how high the fines are. All that seems left to do is pray that there will not be an epidemic. God bless Taiwan.
The swine fever outbreak in China has been met with the same approach by Beijing as it took with the foot-and-mouth outbreak and the SARS epidemic as it refuses to inform Taiwan about the situation. Only a barbaric and uncivilized country would do that. It is no surprise, then, that some people think that China is deliberately using the virus to bring Taiwan down.
Political parties, legislators and mayors that support the so-called “1992 consensus” and push hard for the idea that the two sides of the Taiwan Strait are one family: Are you really trying to bring African swine fever to Taiwan to see to it that the two sides of the Taiwan Strait have the same diseases?
Hu Wen-hui is a media commentator.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath