Pioneer or sinner?
Kharis Templeman, project manager of the Taiwan Democracy and Security Project, which is part of the US-Asia Security Initiative, and a social science researcher at the Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center at Stanford University, presented a speech on Nov. 30 at Encina Hall titled: “The 2018 Taiwanese local elections: Results and Implications.”
He pointed out that the low approval rating of President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) was a key factor in the election results and implied that Tsai’s re-election process looks shaky. She will probably face an intra-party challenge for the 2020 nomination, and she might use electoral incentives to rally her support base or pivot toward the independence issue.
On Dec. 9, attorney Huang Di-ying (黃帝穎) presented a speech titled: “Transform Justice, Judicial Reform and 2018 Election” to San Francisco Bay Area Taiwanese at the Formosan United Methodist Church in San Leandro.
He said that after the election, the Taipei High Administrative Court decided to unfreeze about NT$38.5 billion (US$1.25 billion) in assets belonging to the National Women’s League. It was a big slap in the face of the Ill-gotten Party Assets Settlement Committee. The decision greatly damaged fair competition among political parties and the nation’s transitional justice project.
Yes, there were tons of reviews and discussions in Taiwanese communities around the world expressing criticism, disappointment and frustration at the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) defeats on Nov. 24 in Taiwan’s local nine-in-one elections — mainly caused by the DPP’s poor administrative performance.
Surprisingly, no one mentioned cyberattacks or the impact of vote-buying and underground gambling operations. It seemed that fake news and outside network attacks did not matter to this election. At least in Taiwan people should know the importance of cybersecurity, and how to prevent and avoid attacks.
China’s 50 Cent Party began in 1996, when a local Chinese government official hired Internet commentators to find topics discussed on the Internet and input fake news to manipulate those topics.
It developed from professional Internet commentators to school officials hiring students as part-time Web commentators; from the publicity department in Changsha to Shanghai Normal University to the Chinese Communist Party’s Central Committee and to the General Office of the Chinese State Council. Now it is well-known around the world as the 50 Cent Army.
This army can easily promote any obedient politician from a civilian amateur to a member of the political elite, such as Ko wen-je (柯文哲) in Taipei or Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) in Kaohsiung.
Taiwan adopted China’s old traditional examination system to hire government employees, which is different to the US hiring academics who present opinions and beliefs to the government before adopting policies.
The examination system takes a long time, as employees must be trained to fit a job, while academics need to keep themselves up to date all the time otherwise they will be replaced.
This is an electronic era. A government must act rapidly when facing any challenge. Unfortunately, the DPP government seems not to know how to face this challenge.
Tsai adopted old KMT personnel to run her government; she amazingly turned the KMT’s political burden into the DPP’s crisis with the Mega International Commercial Bank scandal; and she insisted on maintaining the “status quo” of “Chinese Taipei” and suppressed the referendum for Taiwanese athletes to be compete under the name “Taiwan” for the 2020 Tokyo Olympics.
If she keeps insisting on “Chinese Taipei with Chinese values,” then people would rather vote for the KMT. Why do voters need the DPP? If she admits to representing a “Taiwan with Taiwanese values,” she must accept the “one China” policy where Taiwan is not part of China — not the “one China” principle where Taiwan is part of China.
It is ridiculous that a lot of young voters mistook the so-called “1992 consensus” as the “one China” policy. Remember, in 1992 there was a meeting in Hong Kong between the Straits Exchange Foundation, the semi-official representative of the Republic of China (ROC), and the Association for Relations across the Taiwan Straits (ARATS), the semi-representative of the People’s Republic of China, but no consensus was reached. It is a fake political term fabricated by KMT politician Su Chi (蘇起) in 2000.
The year 2020 will be critical for the future of Taiwan. If Tsai is to run for president on behalf of Taiwanese, she must clearly commit to “Taiwan first” and not “Chinese Taipei.” She must be fully aware of her own weakness regarding personnel.
Please be responsible for party politics. Please appoint the right person to do the right thing at the right time and get it done right.
Please clearly identify that you are running for president of Taiwan, not ROC-China. Taiwan cannot afford falling to Chinese occupation. Taiwan is not part of China. China simply does not own the sovereignty of Taiwan.
What a shame about the lousy meeting she had with Ko on Dec. 13. Is Tsai still a president? Is she unconsciously incompetent or unconsciously competent? Time is running short and the 2020 presidential election will come soon.
Tsai could be remarkably labeled as the founding pioneer of a Taiwanese nation or a sinner carrying infamy forever.
For the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), China’s “century of humiliation” is the gift that keeps on giving. Beijing returns again and again to the theme of Western imperialism, oppression and exploitation to keep stoking the embers of grievance and resentment against the West, and especially the US. However, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that in 1949 announced it had “stood up” soon made clear what that would mean for Chinese and the world — and it was not an agenda that would engender pride among ordinary Chinese, or peace of mind in the international community. At home, Mao Zedong (毛澤東) launched
With a new White House document in May — the “Strategic Approach to the People’s Republic of China” — the administration of US President Donald Trump has firmly set its hyper-competitive line to tackle geoeconomic and geostrategic rivalry, followed by several reinforcing speeches by Trump and other Cabinet-level officials. By identifying China as a near-equal rival, the strategy resonates well with the bipartisan consensus on China in today’s severely divided US. In the face of China’s rapidly growing aggression, the move is long overdue, yet relevant for the maintenance of the international “status quo.” The strategy seems to herald a new
To say that this year has been eventful for China and the rest of the world would be something of an understatement. First, the US-China trade dispute, already simmering for two years, reached a boiling point as Washington tightened the noose around China’s economy. Second, China unleashed the COVID-19 pandemic on the world, wreaking havoc on an unimaginable scale and turning the People’s Republic of China into a common target of international scorn. Faced with a mounting crisis at home, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) rashly decided to ratchet up military tensions with neighboring countries in a misguided attempt to divert the
The restructuring of supply chains, particularly in the semiconductor industry, was an essential part of discussions last week between Taiwan and a US delegation led by US Undersecretary of State for Economic Growth, Energy and the Environment Keith Krach. It took precedent over the highly anticipated subject of bilateral trade partnerships, and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) founder Morris Chang’s (張忠謀) appearance on Friday at a dinner hosted by President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) for Krach was a subtle indicator of this. Chang was in photographs posted by Tsai on Facebook after the dinner, but no details about their discussions were disclosed. With