As African swine fever (ASF) continues to spread across China, the Taiwanese government is on the alert, tightening inspections on incoming passengers. Thirty-three travelers were caught smuggling meat products from ASF-affected areas within three days after newly increased fines came into effect.
Quite a few Taiwanese are still unaware of the situation and continue to believe the Chinese government’s propaganda, insisting that ASF is harmless to humans and taking the preventive measures lightly.
When the government on Wednesday last week sent an alert about ASF through an emergency text message system previously used for disaster prevention, it was criticized as making a fuss over a trifle.
Some pro-China Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators even condemned the move, saying that sending such a message would have the opposite effect of lowering people’s alertness as the government was crying wolf.
When the disease first started spreading in northeast China in August, some sheep in Heilongjiang Province were also reported to be infected with anthrax.
Media reports said that 255 sheep were slaughtered following the anthrax outbreak. As anthrax can be transmitted among animals and humans, it also infected 14 people.
Following last month’s nine-in-one elections, many people have been blinded by “China fever,” hoping that the so-called “1992 consensus” would make them rich. To them, the ASF and anthrax epidemic has been a sharp blow.
The “1992 consensus” refers to a tacit agreement between the KMT and the Chinese Communist Party that both sides of the Taiwan Strait acknowledge that there is “one China,” with each side having its own interpretation of what “China” means.
If China cannot even control ASF, which can only be transmitted among pigs, who can believe that it is capable of controlling anthrax, which can be transmitted to humans, or keep it from spreading to Taiwan?
What is more, most Chinese food producers have long valued profit over ethics. There have been media reports that cheap lamb products manufactured by a food processing factory in Jinan in Shandong Province were a mixture of lamb and fox.
One industry insider revealed that some lamb products were made of duck and pork. Indeed, a random DNA test of lamb chops by a local food and drug agency showed that they did not contain any sheep DNA.
Under such circumstances, if any Chinese food processor sneaks anthrax-tainted lamb into other processed meat for sale, that could have unimaginably serious consequences.
As for human anthrax infections, more than 95 percent of cases are skin infections. Without proper treatment, the risk of death is between 10 and 40 percent.
As the ASF and anthrax threats get increasingly severe, Taiwanese should not hope that recognition of the “1992 consensus” can be exchanged for Beijing’s support for Kaohsiung mayor-elect Han Kuo-yu’s (韓國瑜) slogan: “Get the goods out and tourists in, so everyone can make a fortune.” (東西賣得出去,人進得來,大家發大財)
Nor should we be so naive as to believe in the Chinese government’s irresponsible propaganda that eating ASF-contaminated pork is harmless — and therefore risk Chinese meat products entering illegally into Taiwan.
If there were an ASF outbreak in the nation’s hog industry, the total financial losses could exceed NT$180 billion (US$5.8 billion). In the end, the whole nation may have to suffer before anyone makes a fortune.
John Yu is a civil servant.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath