For four years at the turn of the century, Wang Zhaohong worked on a demolition crew in Shenzhen, clearing the way for the once-tiny border village to become a bustling metropolis.
Now, emaciated and struggling for breath, the bedridden 50-year-old said that the work he did would end up killing him.
Without proper safety equipment, he and his colleagues from a remote county in China’s Hunan Province inhaled so much construction dust during Shenzhen’s development boom that they contracted silicosis, a lung-destroying condition.
Wang’s case is acute. He expects to suffocate by Chinese New Year.
This month, China will celebrate the 40th anniversary of its “reform and opening up,” the economic policy that transformed it into the world’s second-largest economy.
Even as hundreds of millions of people have left poverty, Wang and others like him are reminders of the heavy human toll of China’s development, and authorities have sought to censor information and suppress protests.
About 6 million Chinese either suffer from or have already died from pneumoconiosis, or dust-caused lung damage that includes silicosis, according to estimates by Love Save Pneumoconiosis, a Beijing non-governmental organization that advocates for workers with the condition.
Hundreds of migrant workers from three counties in Hunan province, including Wang, have been protesting for compensation from Shenzhen.
“We used to wear the same mask for 10 days before getting a new one,” Wang said in his village in poor, rural Sangzhi County. “At the time, our boss would say to us: ‘If you use a new mask every single day, how will I ever make any money?’”
The workers earned 5,000 to 6,000 yuan (US$725 to US$870 at the current exchange rate) each month, double or triple what other migrant workers were paid at the time.
Almost no one signed contracts, which has made it nearly impossible for them to seek adequate compensation.
The Shenzhen government has offered some workers payments dependent on the severity of their illness of up to 220,000 yuan, said Gu Fuxiang, one of the worker’s representatives.
However, he said it was not nearly enough.
Their prospects look grim in what has been a nearly decade-long fight. Security forces attacked them early last month during their most recent sit-in at Shenzhen City Hall, five workers who were there said.
“For both the local government here and the Shenzhen Government, maintaining stability is absolutely their first priority,” said Gu, who has less severe silicosis.
“We traded our lives for development,” he said. “The government doesn’t care if we’re sick, if we die.”
A Shenzhen Government spokesman referred questions to the police, social security, health and economic reform departments.
The health department hung up on a call seeking comment; the economic reform department declined to comment. The police and social security departments did not respond to multiple calls.
The health crisis is not unique to China; advocacy groups in the US struggled for decades to win compensation for workers dying of such “dust diseases.”
However, the pace of China’s building boom has created an unprecedented number of casualties in just 40 years.
No city in history has grown faster than Shenzhen, whose economic output surpassed that of next-door neighbor Hong Kong for the first time last year.
Shenzhen expects to have the largest metro network in the world by 2030, with 32 subway lines, the state-run China Daily has said.
Migrant workers laid the foundations for many of Shenzhen’s best-known sites, from Shenzhen North Railway Station, which connects the city to Hong Kong and Beijing, to the Ping An International Finance Tower, the fourth-tallest building in the world.
Despite the megacity’s success, workers have mostly had to take out high-interest bank loans, and borrow from family and friends to cover medical costs, their children’s school fees and other expenses.
To pay for his hospital visits, Wang borrowed 50,000 yuan from a rural banking cooperative that is charging him 11.27 percent interest per quarter, according to the loan document he showed reporters.
“The bank still gives us loans because our children cosign. My son has agreed to pay them back once I’m dead,” he said as he rotated homegrown sweet potatoes roasting over charcoal next to his bed.
The Shenzhen Government paid Wang 130,000 yuan in 2009, when his illness was diagnosed, but he said it has not been enough.
“In China, the problem isn’t a lack of money. Shenzhen has an enormous social insurance fund. The problem is ideology,” said Pun Ngai (潘毅), a sociology professor at Hong Kong University, who has spent years following the workers’ plight.
“The Shenzhen government doesn’t think these workers are their responsibility since they aren’t Shenzhen residents,” Pun said. “And the government is worried if they submit to the workers’ demands, people from other provinces will also come seeking compensation.”
The social insurance fund of Shenzhen, which has an official population of 12.5 million, totaled more than 540 billion yuan at the end of last year, official figures showed.
The workers told Reuters that Beijing has come down hard, threatening them and anyone who comes into contact with them if they speak out.
Authorities by the middle of last month forbade all Web sites from reporting or publishing stories related to the Hunan workers suffering from silicosis, according to China Digital Times, which tracks censorship in China.
Prominent state-owned newspapers and TV stations covered their plight in 2009, but have been silent on the issue this year.
This censorship is consistent with an overall political tightening in China over the past five years and comes amid a crackdown on student-worker protests that started in southern China and spread around the country.
In August, about 50 students and other activists from around the country came to Shenzhen to protest with factory workers about the poor conditions at a factory owned by Jasic, a welding company.
“The case of the silicosis workers this year has become very, very sensitive because the government is worried it will become connected to the Jasic case,” Pun said.
The workers have made 11 trips to Shenzhen this year, but said that they are still waiting for adequate compensation.
They are asking for compensation of between 500,000 yuan and 1.1 million yuan, depending on the worker’s condition, Gu said.
Less than 12 hours after reporters arrived in Sangzhi County, the local police began calling workers, ordering them to report to the local police station and verify with whom they had met.
The county police declined to comment.
“The authorities really know how to frighten us; a lot of the workers are too scared to have anything to do with foreign media right now,” Gu said, adding that Shenzhen Government officials had told him that both his phone and WeChat were being monitored.
However, Wang said that he was more worried about the huge debt he was leaving to his family.
He repeatedly wondered aloud whether there was any point in telling his story.
“Our country has progressed so quickly over the past 40 years, farmers don’t necessarily have to farm anymore, it’s really wonderful,” he said wistfully, breathing with the aid of tubes in his nose as X-ray images of his stricken lungs hung in the small window that looks out onto his neighbor’s house.
“I wish I wasn’t bedridden, then I could go out and explore all that is out there,” he said. “Instead, I’m going to die very soon.”
Additional reporting by Reuters’ Shenzhen newsroom
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath