There are TV stations, reporters and staff who are doing a good job with election coverage, but viewer ratings for coverage of the nine-in-one elections were a huge blow for them. Channels that reported on candidates in an uneven manner had more viewers than channels with more balanced reporting.
During ballot counting after the Nov. 24 vote, news channels that updated vote counts earlier received much higher viewer ratings than channels that required the numbers to be verified before they were reported.
Viewer ratings represent advertising income, which is a matter of life and death for commercial TV stations. Consequently, journalists who take their job seriously often struggle with viewer ratings, while their competitors — who pay scant attention to professionalism — get much higher ratings.
With “bad money driving out good,” what is the National Communications Commission (NCC) doing with its authority to censure stations that diseminate misinformation and fake news?
Taiwan’s ballot-counting process is quite wondrous. For hours, viewers who care about election outcomes are fixated on ever-changing and difficult-to-verify vote counts on TV, their mood fluctuating with the fortunes of the candidates they support. It is an open secret that with the exception of Public Television Service (PTS), whose operations do not rely on commercial income, news stations have been “inflating” vote numbers in live broadcasts of vote-counting in the scramble for higher viewer ratings.
During the 2004 presidential election, a scandal broke when news stations trying to outdo each other with inflated vote numbers to the extent that their numbers exceeded the final tally. Following public criticism, stations pledged to exert self-discipline. Some self-restraint was apparent during the 2008 presidential election, but by 2012, they were back at it again.
It seems that no one can stop TV stations from inflating numbers as long as they do it “discreetly” — not inflating them “too much.”
However, coverage of the vote-counting process should be truthful. Reports on ballot numbers should follow verified counts, not the manipulation of news station managers, who become directors catering to viewers’ state of mind and targeting ratings. Reporting vote counts is not a soap opera, but it seems to follows similar logic.
Inflated figures during the 2004 presidential election brought post-election political and social turmoil, because supporters of the pan-blue camp doubted the official results after having watched the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) ticket of Lien Chan (連戰) and James Soong (宋楚瑜) hold a fabricated lead for several hours. In pursuit of advertising income, which seems to be a trivial consideration compared with democracy for such TV stations, they harmed the nation and allowed news coverage — a public good — to become public enemy No. 1.
Social progress is always slower than people expect, because preventing regression and setbacks requires great effort. TV news is closely connected to the quality of democracy, but stations performed poorly in their coverage of last month’s elections, which is a warning of a coming setback. This must be addressed head-on to safeguard Taiwan’s democracy.
With commercial television stations in the mainstream, allowing rule-breakers to profit is tantamount to suppressing and eliminating those who stick to journalistic professionalism, just as turning a blind eye to tax dodgers is tantamount to punishing tax payers.
As market regulator, the NCC should quickly intervene and raise the cost of breaking the law before the media outlets that are still willing to comply with journalistic ethics — sticking to the principle of accuracy and balanced coverage — are forced to throw in the towel. Otherwise, a vicious circle will emerge in which the good ones are eliminated.
If that happens the downfall of professional journalism will bring down the nation’s hard-earned democracy, which was fought for over decades.
Article 27 of the Satellite Broadcasting Act (衛星廣播電視法) stipulates that if a broadcasting business involved in producing and broadcasting news violates the principle of fact verification and hurts the public interest, the NCC can, after receiving a report from the industry’s self-regulatory mechanism, impose a fine. In the past, the NCC did not fine violators out of respect for freedom of expression.
If the premise is the protection of the freedom of expression, then surely the NCC has no excuse to remain idle with the situation today in which journalists who try hard to present truthful and balanced information are deprived of their freedom of expression.
Eve Chiu is a board member of the Campaign for Media Reform.
Translated by Chang Ho-ming
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath