Seventy years ago today, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly. From that day on, human respect, equality and dignity were no longer the privilege of the few, but fundamental rights of all.
Throughout the past seven decades, human rights defenders around the world stood up, raised their voices and fought for the principles enshrined in the Declaration. It is because of the courage and perseverance of these brave and visionary people that we are able to enjoy the rights we have today.
Taiwan has achieved remarkable progress in human rights and democracy in the past few decades precisely because individuals were willing to stand up to defend the universality of these values. And with the local elections peacefully concluded last month, Taiwan has yet again consolidated its standing in this regard.
Nevertheless, whether in Taiwan or in other parts of the world, discrimination against the LGBTI communities has not disappeared. Work remains to be done through communication, education and better protection by the law in order to achieve a safer, friendlier, more respectful and more inclusive environment for everyone.
Taiwan took the commendable step of incorporating the provisions of six of the UN’s nine human rights treaties into its domestic laws, and has undertaken periodic voluntary reviews on the implementation of these treaties, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR).
Driven by the recommendation provided by international experts after the review in 2017 on Taiwan’s implementation of the two covenants, and thanks to its dynamic civil society, Taiwan started to work on remaining challenges, such as migrant workers’ rights and the rights of indigenous peoples, among others things. We sincerely hope that Taiwan’s government will keep on moving forward and be a leader in such issues. In addition, we would like to encourage the people and government of Taiwan to consider and learn more about the alternatives to the death penalty, as well as the re-establishment of a moratorium on the use of the death penalty.
As we celebrate the 70th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, we would like to take this opportunity to call on everyone to speak up for all those who are suffering from prejudice, bigotry and hatred. As the UN’s human rights campaign pledge goes: “When anyone’s human rights are denied, everyone’s rights are undermined.”
Let us all be human rights defenders for each other, and protect each other to be free and equal in dignity and rights. Let us stand up for human rights!
Signed by: Mr. Gary Richard Cowan, Representative of the Australian Office; Mr. Albin Mauritz, Director of Austrian Office Taipei; Mr. Rik Van Droogenbroeck, Director of Belgian Office Taipei; Mr. Jordan J. Reeves, Executive Director of the Canadian Trade Office; Mr. Patrick Rumlar, Representative of the Czech Economic and Cultural Office; Mr. Nicholas Enersen, Director of The Trade Council of Denmark, Taipei; Ms. Madeleine Majorenko, Head of European Economic and Trade Office; Mr. Jari Seilonen, Representative of Finland Trade Center in Taipei; Mr. Benoit Guidee, Director of The French Office in Taipei; Mr. Thomas Prinz, Director General of German Institute Taipei; Mr. Donato Scioscioli, Representative of Italian Economic, Trade and Investment Office, Taipei; Ms. Tania Berchem, Director Luxembourg Trade and Investment Office, Taipei; Mr. Guy Wittich, Representative of Netherlands Trade and Investment Office; Mr. Maciej Gaca, Director General of the Polish Office in Taipei; Mr. Martin Podstavek, Representative of the Slovak Economic and Cultural Office, Taipei; Mr. Jose Luis Echaniz Cobas, Director General of Spanish Chamber of Commerce; Mr. Hakan Jevrell, Representative of Business Sweden-The Swedish Trade and Invest Council; Mr. Rolf Frei, Director of the Trade Office of Swiss Industries; Ms. Catherine Nettleton, Representative of British Office.
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
RSS