The East Asia Summit (EAS) on Nov. 14 and 15 was held against the backdrop of a deplorable security and economic situation in Asia and the world. The summit, chaired by Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong (李顯龍), was attended by the heads of all 10 ASEAN members and eight other countries.
The leaders extensively discussed several issues of regional importance, including broad strategic, political and economic issues, with the aim of promoting peace, stability and economic prosperity in the region.
In doing so, Loong said: “We reaffirmed ASEAN’s central role in the EAS, and ASEAN’s commitment to work in close partnership with all EAS participating countries to ensure the EAS would continue to be an integral component of the evolving regional architecture through ASEAN-led processes.”
The leaders expressed their commitment to strengthening regional cooperation to address security issues, including safety and security of nuclear and other radioactive materials in accordance with national and international obligations.
The meeting also highlighted that cooperation in the Indo-Pacific region should embrace key principles, such as ASEAN centrality, openness, transparency, inclusivity and a rules-based approach to enhance mutual trust, respect and benefits.
On the issue of the South China Sea, the member countries “reaffirmed the importance of maintaining and promoting peace, security, stability, safety and freedom of navigation in and overflight above the South China Sea, and recognized the benefits of having the South China Sea as a sea of peace, stability and prosperity,” and underscored the importance of the full and effective implementation of the 2002 Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea.
This bold statement clearly reflected the growing concerns of the countries about China’s aggressive efforts to institutionalize its claim over the sea by building artificial islands and obstructing free movement.
With this in mind, the EAS has focused on promoting maritime cooperation as a new area of cooperation under the Manila Plan of Action, which includes practical and comprehensive action lines to promote this area of cooperation.
The member countries also supported further strengthening maritime cooperation among EAS-participating countries in a collective and holistic manner through ASEAN-led mechanisms, such as the ASEAN Regional Forum and the ASEAN Defense Ministers’ Meeting-Plus, in line with the 2015 EAS Statement on Enhancing Regional Maritime Cooperation.
At a time when terrorism has emerged as one of the most deadly global security issues, leaders at the EAS condemned attacks that had caused significant loss of life, and discussed the need for countries to support “a sustained and comprehensive approach involving the active participation and collaboration of all states ... and international and regional organizations to impede, impair, isolate and incapacitate the terrorist threat.”
This move will strengthen the voices arguing for stringent action against countries that support terrorist organizations and use terrorism as state policy.
On the issue of connectivity, member countries of the EAS expressed support for ASEAN’s efforts to implement the Master Plan on ASEAN Connectivity (MPAC) 2025, which aims to achieve a seamlessly connected and integrated ASEAN.
This in turn would “promote competitiveness, inclusiveness and a greater sense of community,” they said.
In so doing, the lead implementing body for the MPAC 2025 Strategic Area on Sustainable Infrastructure has been established. This will increase the understanding by governments, the private sector and communities of the importance of regional connectivity.
To promote trade and commerce, they noted the need for greater certainty and policies to sustain this momentum.
They also shared the resolve to keep markets open, inclusive and competitive through the rules-based multilateral trading system, as well as improving transparency and predictability in business.
Some leaders emphasized the importance of shared prosperity and being able to compete freely and fairly. They also noted the importance of efforts to improve the WTO, including its monitoring, rulemaking and dispute settlement functions.
Taiwan undoubtedly shares the interests of the East Asian countries on all these issues.
President Tsai Ing-Wen’s (蔡英文) New Southbound Policy has taken particular interest in strengthening ties with ASEAN. This can be gauged from the fact that ASEAN accounts for a big portion of Taiwanese exports and foreign direct investment.
Between January 2016 and April, ASEAN received more than 86 percent of Taiwan’s exports to countries covered by the policy and the meeting of the EAS has further increased the prospect of expanding ties.
Meanwhile, the absence of US President Donald Trump from the meeting did not go unnoticed.
His absence also intensified the efforts of countries to promote and strengthen cooperation to mention peace and security in this part of the word, when China is trying every possible thing to reshape the geostrategic situation in Asia in its favor so that it can play its hegemonic act without obstruction.
It has to be seen how the summit succeeds in its endeavor of maintaining a balance of power in the region.
Sumit Kumar is a Ministry of Foreign Affairs visiting fellow at National Chengchi University in Taipei and a research fellow at the Chennai Center for China Studies in India.
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase
RSS