A strict immigration policy has helped make Japan one of the world’s oldest and most homogeneous societies. Now, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s plan to invite as many as a half-million foreign workers is testing the country’s tolerance for change.
Abe is preparing to introduce legislation to allow migrants to start filling vacancies next year in sectors hit worst by the country’s shrinking population.
While the government has not released a target, local media including Kyodo news agency have reported numbers that would represent a 40 percent increase over the 1.3 million foreign workers now living in the country.
In a sign of urgency, Abe’s government has announced a start date on April next year for the policy before debate has begun in parliament. The proposal is among the first he is seeking to tackle after last month winning a historic third term as leader of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party, paving the way for him to become the country’s longest-serving prime minister.
If passed, the legislation would amount to Japan’s most dramatic immigration overhaul since the 1990s, when it let “trainees” from Asian nations work in the country. Foreigners made up only about 1.7 percent of the country’s population as of April, compared with 3.4 percent in South Korea and about 12 percent in Germany.
Abe got a reminder of the risks on Sunday last week as more than 100 noisy protesters marched through Tokyo’s upmarket Ginza shopping district, waving rising sun flags and urging the plan’s withdrawal.
Although the group was outnumbered by police and pursued by counterprotesters chanting “racists go home,” they appeared keen to tap into anti-immigrant sentiment that has bubbled up elsewhere in the developed world.
The organizer calls itself Japan First, in an allusion to US President Donald Trump’s “America First” policies.
“Far-right parties have very little support in Japan,” said Eriko Suzuki, a professor who researches migration at Kokushikan University. “But there are a lot more people, a kind of reserve army, who are vaguely concerned about admitting foreigners. If the government doesn’t put together appropriate policies, that unease will increase.”
The risks of inaction could be just as great as Japan’s declining population takes its toll on the economy.
In a survey published by the Japan Chamber of Commerce and Industry in June, two-thirds of companies said that they were short of workers.
The number of companies folding because of a lack of workers jumped by 40 percent in the first half of the financial year from the same period last year, Teikoku Databank Ltd said.
Abe’s plan, set to be introduced in the parliamentary session beginning later this month, calls for creating two classes of foreign workers to serve in about 10 as-yet-unspecified industries.
Lower-skilled migrants would be allowed to stay for as long as five years and barred from bringing their families. More highly skilled workers could bring family members and stay longer -— potentially gaining permanent residence.
Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga on Friday said that the total number of new workers has not been determined.
“It’s a sea change in Japan’s immigration policy,” said Ippei Torii of Solidarity Network with Migrants Japan, who has for decades supported foreign workers experiencing problems. “Japan is finally getting around to thinking about how to deal with this.”
Japan First Tokyo chapter head Mikio Okamura called for the government to spend money on improving pay and conditions for Japanese workers, rather than relying on foreigners.
“Before you let in foreigners, you should deal with Japan’s unemployed. We want them to use tax money to do that,” Okamura told Bloomberg News. “Then, we would have Japanese people looking after the elderly. That would be the happiest result for the Japanese and for the foreigners, as well.”
Other, more mainstream groups have expressed concerns, with the Japanese Trade Union Confederation questioning the lack of public debate in a letter submitted to the government in August.
The group, known as Rengo, has said that foreign workers should not be accepted without careful consideration.
Japan has had a difficult history of attracting foreign blue-collar workers. The country invited in Brazilians and Peruvians of Japanese descent when the economy was growing, but ended up offering to pay them to leave after the 2008 financial crisis.
A system of accepting mostly Asian “trainees” — launched in 1993 and officially intended to transfer skills to developing countries — turned out mostly to provide a supply of labor at less than minimum wage, while often preventing participants from leaving jobs where they were treated badly.
Japanese media regularly report on foreign students struggling with massive debts owed to the shady brokers who bring them over.
Some of the issues were tackled in an outline of the coming legislation published on Thursday.
Under it, foreign workers must be paid at least as much as their Japanese counterparts and would be allowed to change jobs within the same sector.
Nevertheless, their presence could hold down wages, some economists have said — working against Abe’s six-year push to raise incomes and fight deflation.
The influx of labor could also hold back necessary progress in improving productivity, said Yoichi Kaneko, a former Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development economist and lawmaker, who now works for an information technology firm.
“The labor shortage is a reality, but if you bring in foreigners, working conditions will not improve and the minimum wage will not rise,” Kaneko said. “That may be good for companies, but for the workers it’s not good at all.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath