In his recent best-selling book Factfulness, the late international health expert Hans Rosling shows that horrors such as natural disasters, oil spills and battlefield deaths are trending steeply downward, and that harvest yields, literacy rates and other development indicators are on the rise. Taking a fact and evidence-based approach, Rosling makes the case for optimism in what seems like an increasingly chaotic world.
There is also cause for optimism in the realm of global health, and for a simple reason. Just as the Industrial Revolution produced far-reaching advances in medicine, the ongoing digital revolution will allow us to improve healthcare in ways that were hard to imagine just a few years ago.
Almost every country in the world has committed to the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals, an international agenda for improving the wellbeing of humanity and the planet that sustains it. In terms of global health, the goals aim to eliminate preventable child deaths and major epidemics, and to achieve universal health coverage.
Though highly ambitious, the goals are eminently achievable. We need only seize the opportunities offered by the Internet, mobile devices and other digital technologies, which are already expanding healthcare access and improving quality of care in hard-to-reach communities.
Consider India. Earlier this year, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government introduced “Modicare,” the world’s largest government-funded health insurance program, which will cover up to 40 percent of India’s 1.3 billion citizens. The government aims to halt the rise of non-communicable diseases, such as diabetes and cancer, while preventing poverty-inducing healthcare expenditures at the household level. In a country the size of India, the program relies heavily on technology to link people with healthcare services, to store and analyze patient data, and to prevent catastrophes that could arise from mixing up patients’ health records.
Digital technology can also ensure that patients in remote areas receive care from highly skilled providers. In the Novartis Foundation’s telemedicine program in Ghana, 70 percent of provider-patient consultations are handled by telephone, thus sparing patients from arduous journeys to primary-care centers.
Digital technologies are also revolutionizing health education. In isolated regions, health workers often travel on foot for hours to receive training and many inevitably end up without the training they need.
However, now healthcare providers can receive training from anywhere by way of smartphones and tablets.
One of our partners, Last Mile Health, has created an entire digital platform specifically tailored for community health education. These and other efforts are decentralizing healthcare provision and training, and empowering local practitioners — all of which is essential for achieving universal health coverage.
Needless to say, digital technologies will also be driving the next wave of life-changing therapies. Social-networking technologies have already made recruitment for clinical trials more efficient, and artificial intelligence and predictive analytics have allowed for trials to be conducted much faster.
However, across the digital landscape, it is broadband that will deliver some of the most significant improvements of all. In low-income countries, high-speed Internet can be a game-changer at every level of the health system.
Building broadband infrastructure in resource-poor countries is a complex challenge, though. Too often, digital-health services are fragmented among government agencies, businesses and non-governmental organizations. Many efforts are duplicated as a result and chances for collaboration are squandered.
Uganda is a cautionary tale: In 2012, so many conflicting digital health projects were in play that the government was forced to declare a temporary moratorium on all of them.
The Broadband Commission Working Group on Digital Health, which is co-chaired by the Novartis Foundation, is focusing on how technology can improve care for non-communicable diseases. During the UN General Assembly last month, the commission published The Promise of Digital Health: Addressing Non-communicable Diseases to Accelerate Universal Health Coverage in LMICs, referring to low and middle-income countries.
The goal is to offer pragmatic advice to policymakers and other stakeholders to help them reimagine the way digital health can address non-communicable diseases.
Clearly, governments must do more to integrate digital-health efforts across ministries, and to coordinate with private and nonprofit-sector stakeholders when possible. Such collaboration is already happening in places like the Philippines, where the National eHealth Steering Committee oversees a suite of digital-health initiatives, thus creating an ideal environment for digital innovation.
Still, digital technology is not a panacea, so we must choose our priorities wisely. The first priority should be on outcomes. In many countries, health providers are rewarded for tasks they perform, rather than for end results. Outcome-oriented digital technologies can ensure that this changes.
A second priority is to improve data literacy. Digital technologies allow us to capture and mine data for insights at every level — from individual biology to global patterns of disease. Training curricula for healthcare providers and administrators should thus include instruction in statistics, data management and analytics so that providers can keep up with digital advances.
A final priority is to bear in mind that digital technology is valuable only if it is being used to improve how systems function. Physicians should not be spending more time entering data than they do caring for patients. Fortunately, when applied properly, digital technology can help automate the process so that providers are freed up to do what they do best.
It has been three years since the world ratified the sustainable development goals, including near-term objectives to achieve universal health coverage and universal, affordable Internet access. Recent progress shows that we should be optimistic about achieving these targets.
However, success will depend on whether we can harness the digital revolution for the benefit of all.
Ann Aerts is head of the Novartis Foundation. Harald Nusser is head of Novartis Social Business.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing