As a judge, Brazil’s Zaloar Murat Martins de Souza is used to making tough calls. More and more, he finds himself having to make one of the toughest of all: whether to separate a child from their family.
De Souza works in Dourados in the southwestern state of Mato Grosso do Sul, where large numbers of indigenous children are growing up in care, raising questions over who is best placed to look after vulnerable young people.
He said that poverty is fueling drug and alcohol abuse and violence among the tribal communities of Dourados, home to about 220,000 people, including 10,000 from Brazil’s indigenous minorities.
“The vast majority live in a state of misery and this deprives the family,” De Souza said in his office as he stared at a pile of lawsuits. “Alcohol and drugs are the two great evils of our indigenous villages.”
The number of indigenous children in care has doubled to 38 in the past four years, local social worker Ana Liege Charao Dias Borges said.
Brazil’s National Indian Foundation (FUNAI), the government agency that represents indigenous people’s interests, has raised concerns about children being wrongly removed from their parents.
In a report last year, FUNAI said it had received complaints of children being taken from their families “without notice, motivation or time for farewells.”
They are forced to adapt to a new and unknown way of life that can make reintegration into their community difficult, the report said.
They “forget customs, their mother tongue... Taking children from their tribes deprives them of a collective future,” it said.
More than half the children in shelters in Dourados were indigenous, up from one-third two years ago, Charao Dias Borges said.
Overall, indigenous groups make up about 5 percent of the local population.
Among them is Ana, a Kaiowa Indian girl who was taken into care after she was raped at her home two years ago when she was just nine. Her name has been changed to protect her identity.
At a children’s home in Dourados, Ana said that her mother regularly got drunk and left the house, leaving her and her younger sister alone.
“He hurt me... He closed my mouth and I could not breathe,” she said of her ordeal, sitting on a bed surrounded by dolls in a dimly lit room.
Court documents list her father as the main suspect.
Ana now lives at the Santa Rita home, where children removed from their parents stay until a judge decides whether they can eventually be sent back to their families or should be referred to adoption authorities.
It includes a school and houses where the children live with full-time adult supervision, surrounded by toys. For many, life there is better than at home.
Under Brazilian law, children should only stay for a maximum of 18 months, but FUNAI said some remain for years — and the longer they stay, the harder it is for them to go home.
Santa Rita shelter director Monica Roberta Marin de Medeiros said that rising levels of violence and abuse are a major obstacle to sending them home.
According to national law, indigenous children can only be adopted by non-indigenous parents if all options have been exhausted within their own community, De Medeiros said.
Elida Oliveira, a Kaiowa Indian, said her son was taken away from her just a week after she gave birth in 2015.
“They [health workers] called the guardianship council saying that they had to take the child because I wasn’t able to raise him,” she said, referring to a panel of experts who work on child protection issues.
Oliveira, who has five other children, including a young baby who still lives with her, denied this, saying that she had always been able to feed her family.
“I want my son back. I’m alive, not dead,” the 39-year-old said outside her home in an informal indigenous settlement in Dourados.
De Souza, who ruled on the original case, said he would decide whether to send the child back to its mother or for adoption.
“We’ll have to see how their ties are because it’s been three years” since they were separated, he said.
Diogenes Cariaga, an anthropologist based in Dourados, said that taking young children into care should always be “a last resort.”
“Indigenous people cannot be all profiled as agents of violence,” he said.
Instead, authorities should focus on addressing the root causes of child abuse and neglect, such as poverty, addiction and unsanitary conditions, he said.
When Ana entered the shelter in 2016, the first thing she remembers is that “all girls were clean and I was dirty.”
However, she is eager to return home and said her mother regularly visits her and no longer gets drunk.
Others prefer their new life, among them 10-year-old Carolina — also not her real name — who has been living in the children’s home since 2016, when community leaders and health workers reported she was neglected by her mother.
“Here is better because there is a bed to sleep, food to eat and we sleep warm. I felt cold there [at home],” she said.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath