At 1am on April 23, Yue Xin (岳昕) was rudely awakened in her dormitory at China’s prestigious Peking University by her mother and a faculty adviser.
Yue, emboldened by the global #MeToo movement, had gained prominence across China for demanding that her university release information about a decades-old rape and suicide case.
She should stop her activities, her mother and adviser said, as they shook her awake.
Illustration: Lance Liu
Shortly after the incident, she posted an open letter online about what had happened.
“When I saw my mother bawling, slapping her face, kneeling and begging and even threatening suicide, my heart broke, but as a matter of principle, I could not retreat,” she wrote.
Last month Yue took a leading role in another cause, joining dozens of student activists from across China who had come to the southern city of Huizhou to support factory workers trying to form a labor union.
“At university, my friends and I used to talk about how we lacked motivation, how we felt lost and trapped, but I don’t feel that when I’m here, when I’m engaged with society and fighting for things I believe in,” Yue said on Aug. 23.
In two dozen interviews, Yue and other young rights advocates in southern China spoke about the self-interest and materialism they saw among students in China’s elite universities.
They said that they would rather act to address growing inequality in China, as well as other social concerns.
They have been facing off with the Chinese government in recent months over issues like sexual assault on campuses, workers’ rights and the right to host reading groups to discuss social issues.
Unlike the student leaders of the 1989 pro-democracy Tiananmen protests, the activists said they were not calling for an overhaul of China’s political system.
Instead, they take their inspiration from the intellectuals of the May Fourth movement, the 1919 protests that called for China to strengthen itself and were instrumental in forming the Chinese Communist Party.
CHALLENGE
Today’s rights advocates are calling for greater equality in Chinese society, as well as better treatment for minority groups, migrant workers and lower-income groups.
While apparently small in number, the groups are likely viewed as a challenge by the ruling Communist Party, which is wary of activism with national scope and aware of the role students and intellectuals have played in social movements throughout China’s history, including in its own revolution.
In the interviews, the groups cited Marxist and Leninist ideals, as well as quotes from Mao Zedong (毛澤東) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), as they spoke about their desire to address China’s inequalities.
While acknowledging the challenges of Chinese censorship, they have also become adept at getting their message out online and on social media.
They use code words to evade government scrutiny. They communicate on messaging apps using end-to-end encryption. On the heavily censored messaging platform WeChat, they send images of articles, rotated and distorted with shapes and squiggles that can trip up text-recognition functions.
When online censors tried to scrub a letter Yue posted on WeChat in April about being pressured by her university, fellow students used blockchain technology to ensure it remained accessible.
Peking University and China’s Public Security Bureau did not respond to requests for comment.
While some students on China’s elite university campuses expressed sympathy for Yue and other rights advocates, others told reporters they saw them as “radicals” or said they had not heard of their activities.
The groups say the government has responded to their activities by, among other things, putting them under surveillance, pressuring their families and detaining many.
At dawn on Aug. 24, police raided an apartment in Huizhou where Yue and about 50 rights advocates were staying, taking everyone away. The activists had traveled to Huizhou to support workers at a factory owned by Jasic, a welding equipment company. Supporters of the groups in Beijing and other parts of the country were also detained.
That evening, Xinhua news agency released the first state media coverage of the protests, condemning the factory workers and alleging they had been supported by organizations backed by foreign governments. The story did not mention the raid in Huizhou.
The article made one reference to the students, saying they had been “swept up” by the “persistent agitation” of overseas Web sites.
Some students have been escorted back to their hometowns by their parents and the police, where they are under varying degrees of surveillance, according to interviews with some of the activists. Others remain missing.
For some, the Huizhou detentions were not the first time they have stared down Chinese authorities.
In December, eight were detained for “creating a disturbance” after organizing a reading group in the southern city of Guangzhou that delved into social issues and Marxist theory.
Shortly afterward, the group launched an online publication called Pioneer Magazine, with posts about student activism, factory workers, Marxism and social inequality. Articles are shared via github, a coding platform that remains unblocked in China.
Three of those detained in December, Xu Zhongliang (徐忠良), Zheng Yongming (鄭永明) and Gu Jiayue (顧佳悅) were also detained in the Huizhou raids and are still missing.
Reporters spoke with the activists before they were detained, in the four-bedroom apartment they had rented on the outskirts of Huizhou.
They had rosters to share duties for preparing meals and cleaning, as well as shooting and editing videos, outreach and social media.
Several students talked about the diverse range of social issues they were engaged in through on-campus clubs — from fighting against sexual harassment to improving the lives of migrant workers in megacities like Beijing.
LEADER TAKEN
About 50 students — including about 20 from Peking University — and other rights advocates originally came to Huizhou after some Jasic workers were detained by the authorities.
Their numbers more than doubled after a leader, Shen Mengyu (沈?鈺), was taken away in a car by three unidentified men on Aug. 11.
“Something that is really drilled into us at university is this concept of having sentiments for the family and country,” said Feng Ge (馮歌), 23, a Peking University student. “It can’t just be an empty slogan. Here we have an opportunity to act.”
Support for the factory workers has poured in from across the country, the students said, adding that many friends and classmates had sent donations over WeChat.
Yue and Zheng said new supporters had been calling each day, saying they wanted to join them, but were too afraid.
Yue, who had been in regular contact with reporters about the worker protests, has not responded to repeated telephone calls and text messages since the raid.
Before she disappeared, Yue wrote an open letter to Xi, saying that young people of all backgrounds should live among the working class — an example Xi set himself when he lived in a rural Chinese village.
“We are not a foreign power, nor a student revolution, nor do we make other political demands,” Yue said in the letter published online on Aug. 19. “We just want to ensure there is justice for the Jasic factory workers.”
Despite the pressure from the authorities, the rights groups appear undeterred.
“Can it really be that the students of elite universities should only eat, drink and be merry?” Zhang Shengye, a Peking University graduate, wrote in an open letter released on Sunday, which was signed by more than 60 supporters of the factory workers. “Should we avoid discussing affairs of the nation and just be blindly subservient?”
Zhang was detained on Sunday night, labor rights advocates said.
Additional reporting by the Shenzhen newsroom
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath