What the president should do
When a baby is abused, he or she will cry or struggle until the abuse is stopped.
Unfortunately, when Taiwan is abused, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) still insists on her “status quo” policy and accepts the newly imposed “status quo.” She has done nothing in response to abuse against the country she is responsible for.
If this continues, Taiwan will have no status or will disappear completely.
Many Taiwanese voted for Tsai as president, hoping that she would become an “Iron Lady” like former British prime minister Margaret Thatcher.
Tsai has a graduate-school education in England and speaks English with a British accent.
Although Tsai has implemented some brave, unprecedented reforms, these cannot prevent her approval rating from falling.
A recent poll showed her popularity standing for the 2020 presidential election at No. 5.
This situation is not healthy for Tsai herself, the Democratic Progress Party, or Taiwan as a country, unless something is done without further delay.
There are several things that Tsai and her administration can do as a start to reverse the situation:
Stop calling China “Mainland China,” as this implies the antonymic term “Taiwan, China.”
Sign the petitions to change “Chinese Taipei” to “Taiwan” for the 2020 Tokyo Olympics, as our motherland is Taiwan.
Stop using China Airlines, which is easily confused with China Air.
Likewise, the names People’s Republic of China and Republic of China are extremely confusing.
Taiwan should not steal China’s name and China should not impose its name on Taiwan.
Apply for UN General Assembly membership as Taiwan, as the UN is a universal organization and Taiwan is a member of the world village.
Normalize Taiwan as a country, like nearly 200 others.
A Taiwanese proverb says: “If you are timid, you will never win” (驚驚不會得等). This proverb applies to everyone, including a president.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
An objective comparison?
It may not be accurate for Tsai Chuo-li to sum up in his letter: “And yet sections of the media and certain politicians insisted on making a meal out of the armored-vehicle thing” (Letter, Aug. 29, page 8). I do not find such comments to be objective. On the contrary, I find it to be a one-sided subjective observation.
I was not at all following the news. I only knew President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) was attacked strongly by the media and talk-show guests recently for traveling to the disaster areas in southern Taiwan in an armored vehicle.
However, by chance, I was watching television one night, and although I do not recall whether it was a talk or news show, I did see a footage of the president in an armored vehicle that was videotaped by a “civilian.”
My own subjective thought would be I totally agree that visiting the disaster-hit area most efficiently and safely, the Presidential Office made a sound choice.
However, the following morning I saw a news report which showed a photo of two camera-crew members standing right next to the president (one had a camera ready to take a photo from the best angle) in that small open space, while she waved and smiled to victims standing in at least ankle-deep water.
Such a scene truly reflected no empathy or “the soft part” of our president’s heart.
I do understand that in his letter, Tsai Chuo-li intended to compare the heavy rains that struck Japan and Taiwan.
I know nothing about weather or floods, and maybe I need to research further on whether Akita and Hiroshima have always suffered flood crises whenever they are hit by heavy rainfall.
On the other hand, I do know Kaohsiung suffered not just this once, but several times, and the central government has invested heavily with large sums of taxpayer money to improve the situation.
It is simply a shame that God, who is the only one capable to be in control of the whole universe, did not spare our cities in the south from such severe natural disasters.
May we stay objective.
Linda Lai
Taipei
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath