On Monday night last week, Fox News TV presenter Tucker Carlson once again talked about the alleged plight of white South African farmers on his program.
On Twitter, US President Donald Trump said that he had been watching.
The US president’s tweet called for further study, but treated the “large-scale killing of farmers” as a settled fact, when reporting indicated that against the background of a generally high murder rate in South Africa, there was no evidence of white farmers being specifically targeted.
However, Trump’s tweet came at the end of a long process, whereby the far-right idea of “white genocide” in South Africa has been mainstreamed, working its way from far-right Web sites and forums into the rightward edge of mainstream media, and then into policy proposals.
News Corp outlets have played an outsized role in that process.
The conspiracy theory of “white genocide” has been a staple of the racist far right for decades. It has taken many forms, but all of them imagine that there is a plot to either replace, remove or simply liquidate white populations.
South Africa and Zimbabwe in particular have exerted a fascination on the racist far right, because in the mind of white nationalists, they show what happens to a white minority after it loses control of a country that it once ruled.
The Charleston shooter, Dylann Roof, was obsessed, like many other white supremacists, with “Rhodesia,” as Zimbabwe was known under white minority rule.
As the Christian Science Monitor reported in the wake of his massacre, the fates of the two countries are “held up as proof of the racial inferiority of blacks; and the diminished stature of whites is presented as an ongoing genocide that must be fought.”
More recent advocacy for South Africans on the racist far right has been brought about by the South African government’s moves on land reform, and some skilled and relentless entrepreneurship from the South African far right on the issue.
A key figure in this enterprise is Simon Roche, a senior member of the millennialist, white nationalist and survivalist group the Suidlanders, who in their own words exist to “prepare a Protestant Christian South African Minority for a coming violent revolution,” or race war.
Last year, Roche traveled extensively in the US and beyond, promoting the idea that whites in South Africa were under attack, and at risk of ethnic cleansing.
Roche appeared not only at far-right conferences like American Renaissance and on a whole range of alt-right podcasts, but also in interviews with “alt-light” figures with large, crossover audiences, such as Stefan Molyneux and Mike Cernovich.
Through late last year and early this year, the idea of South African white genocide was picked up by ostensibly more mainstream figures.
Ann Coulter promoted the idea that white farmers were “the only real refugees” in a retweet of white nationalist Tara McCarthy.
Tucker Carlson’s claim in March that South Africa was “falling apart” due to land reform was dutifully reposted at reddit’s Trumpist hub, The Donald.
Katie Hopkins memorably visited South Africa in preparation for a documentary on the subject.
Willem Petzer, described by independent media organization Unicorn Riot as a “racist Internet pundit,” has been a guest of Proud Boys founder Gavin McInnes on his podcast, and hosted McInnes in return on his YouTube channel.
Meanwhile, petitions appeared appealing to Trump to accord special immigration status to white farmers, some attracting thousands of signatures.
In March, the alleged plight of the farmers became the subject of a campaign by News Corp tabloids in Australia.
In a preview of Trump’s response, the News Corp intervention led then-Australian minister of home affairs Peter Dutton to float a short-lived proposal to give preferential immigration treatment to white farmers.
The move was praised by white nationalists on forums like Stormfront and cited by rightwingers of all kinds as evidence of the issue’s importance.
Roche and the Suidlanders claimed credit for the development. (As at this writing, Dutton was involved in an internecine struggle for Australia’s prime ministership.)
Rallies in several Australian cities drew hundreds of people to demonstrate on behalf of South African farmers and attracted politicians, including some from the governing Liberal Party. In the US, politicians reportedly met with members of other Afrikaner groups on the issue.
Since then, Lauren Southern, who has become one of the alt-right’s breakout e-celebrities, has completed and heavily promoted a documentary on the issue, entitled Farmlands.
That film was a centerpiece of her recent tour of Australia with Molyneux.
Southern, and her advocacy on the issue, received extensive promotion in News Corp properties.
On Monday last week, another Southern appearance indicated how important the issue was becoming to the big dogs in US right-wing media.
Talk radio host Michael Savage devoted an entire show to the issue, and presented Southern and Hopkins to his 11 million listeners to speak about their own trips to South Africa.
Savage — regularly described as one of the most influential talk radio hosts in the country — repeatedly described the situation as “genocide.”
When Southern was asked how people could support the farmers, she mentioned the Suidlanders and urged listeners to contact politicians about the issue.
Savage also promoted his own petition to Trump on behalf of the farmers.
On Twitter, he was incensed at Carlson receiving credit for the US president’s moves on the issue.
However, as in Australia, the crucial step in creating a policy proposal issue appears to have been advocacy by a News Corp outlet, in this case Tucker Carlson’s program. Indeed, News Corp now appears to be a crucial conduit for alt-right ideas to reach governments.
The development has been celebrated overnight by the racist far right, but so too has the whole process by which “white genocide” has become a matter of broader public debate.
Earlier this year, an anonymous podcaster on the white genocide-focused White Rabbit Radio said: “This was the province of Stormfront five, 10 years ago, white genocide in South Africa. Now it is mainstream.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath